Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Tesla's Zero Time Generator
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ayasano" data-source="post: 79350" data-attributes="member: 4804"><p><a href="http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html" target="_blank">Gravity Probe B - MISSION STATUS</a></p><p></p><p>As you'll see in the linked article, the results were consistent with General Relativity within a margin of error. As for GPS, I think you'll find that if General Relativity was wrong, GPS would cease to work at all, as the system is programmed to automatically correct for time dilation. Without the corrections, the system quickly becomes completely innacurate. I'm not sure what gave you the idea that GR is a "failed" theory. Far from it in fact.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, the observations only show centripetal force. The problem is that people rely on gut feeling telling them centrifugal force must exist, when in fact it doesn't. As for the maths, the reason it's called a "fictitious force" is because it's simply a way to make Newtons laws work in a non-inertial reference frame. From the perspective of an inertial reference frame, it isn't needed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say here. A theory of chemistry and physics is needed to build an internal combustion engine. A theory of electromagnetism is needed in order to build a computer. A theory of qunatum mechanics is needed to build a quantum computer. Theories are how we understand the world in a way that is useful to us. When you're constructing extremely complex objects, intuition just doesn't cut it.</p><p></p><p>As for the coverup stuff, could you elaborate? What exactly is being covered up?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ayasano, post: 79350, member: 4804"] [url="http://einstein.stanford.edu/highlights/status1.html"]Gravity Probe B - MISSION STATUS[/url] As you'll see in the linked article, the results were consistent with General Relativity within a margin of error. As for GPS, I think you'll find that if General Relativity was wrong, GPS would cease to work at all, as the system is programmed to automatically correct for time dilation. Without the corrections, the system quickly becomes completely innacurate. I'm not sure what gave you the idea that GR is a "failed" theory. Far from it in fact. Actually, the observations only show centripetal force. The problem is that people rely on gut feeling telling them centrifugal force must exist, when in fact it doesn't. As for the maths, the reason it's called a "fictitious force" is because it's simply a way to make Newtons laws work in a non-inertial reference frame. From the perspective of an inertial reference frame, it isn't needed. I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say here. A theory of chemistry and physics is needed to build an internal combustion engine. A theory of electromagnetism is needed in order to build a computer. A theory of qunatum mechanics is needed to build a quantum computer. Theories are how we understand the world in a way that is useful to us. When you're constructing extremely complex objects, intuition just doesn't cut it. As for the coverup stuff, could you elaborate? What exactly is being covered up? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Tesla's Zero Time Generator
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top