Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Tesla's Zero Time Generator
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Orpheus Rex" data-source="post: 79419" data-attributes="member: 4500"><p>Can I say that I find this conversation hilarious?<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite39" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p>One of you is mainly arguing Newtonian et al. physics (or classical physics), and the other is arguing Einstien et al. physics. It's like arguing between Euclid's geometry or Lobachevsky's. </p><p>Both can portray the universe in a quantifiable and effective way, despite that they have conflicting interpretations of the phenomena. Einstien's theories have simpler and more multipurpose equations/formulas that are extremely accurate and as such are more useful in a practical sense (and admittedly explains inconsistencies in classical physics, such as the way the earth does not have uniform gravity). On the flip side, Einsteinian physics also predicts unusual phenomena that may not exist(although some of the phenomenas were later discovered, i.e. black holes.)</p><p>Einstien developed his theory by trying to unite the phenomena in classical physics, he did so by making time a spatial dimension. The math used for the simplification was borrowed from an obscure mathematician. The method Einstien used to solve to create the equations for his theory is rarely talked about.</p><p>Classical physics has no explanations of phenomenas except by relying on forces that have unknowable natures, but with predictable results.</p><p></p><p>Both versions physics have trouble answering anything in the quantum. That is why Quantum Mechanics was developed by a cast of hundreds. String Theory in turn is an attempt to find a more accurate and efficient equation that unites quantum mechanics to "macrophysics".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Orpheus Rex, post: 79419, member: 4500"] Can I say that I find this conversation hilarious?;) One of you is mainly arguing Newtonian et al. physics (or classical physics), and the other is arguing Einstien et al. physics. It's like arguing between Euclid's geometry or Lobachevsky's. Both can portray the universe in a quantifiable and effective way, despite that they have conflicting interpretations of the phenomena. Einstien's theories have simpler and more multipurpose equations/formulas that are extremely accurate and as such are more useful in a practical sense (and admittedly explains inconsistencies in classical physics, such as the way the earth does not have uniform gravity). On the flip side, Einsteinian physics also predicts unusual phenomena that may not exist(although some of the phenomenas were later discovered, i.e. black holes.) Einstien developed his theory by trying to unite the phenomena in classical physics, he did so by making time a spatial dimension. The math used for the simplification was borrowed from an obscure mathematician. The method Einstien used to solve to create the equations for his theory is rarely talked about. Classical physics has no explanations of phenomenas except by relying on forces that have unknowable natures, but with predictable results. Both versions physics have trouble answering anything in the quantum. That is why Quantum Mechanics was developed by a cast of hundreds. String Theory in turn is an attempt to find a more accurate and efficient equation that unites quantum mechanics to "macrophysics". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Tesla's Zero Time Generator
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top