The Beginning of Time Travel.

SergiusPaulus

SergiusPaulus

Senior Member
So it begins. Err, continues maybe. šŸ˜

Today a Particle. Tomorrow something bigger and so on.
Unfortunately this is a partial article. Halfway through they may ask you to subscribe to continue reading.

www.newscientist.com

Quantum time travel: The experiment to 'send a particle into the past'

Time loops have long been the stuff of science fiction. Now, using the rules of quantum mechanics, we have a way to effectively transport a particle back in time ā€“ hereā€™s how
www.newscientist.com www.newscientist.com
 
Ah the original Pym Particle making its possibly real debut. šŸ˜Ž You may have to watch Endgame to be familiar with Pym.

 

So if they succeed in sending a particle to the past how would they be able to identify the particle as having arrived in the past? Can ā€œintentionā€ to send a particle to a closer future from a farther time in the future allow us to witness the arrival of the particle?
One example is you strongly intend to send a particle in 5 minutes to only 3 minutes in the future. Can you observe the particle arriving in 3 minutes? Thatā€™s using human intention. Is the HDR influenced by human intention of the person using the HDR?
I would imagine a device that you could ā€œelectronicallyā€set to send the particle from 5 minutes to 3 minutes might be a different result. Technology versus intent.
 

Ah. I asked AI about the HDR.
Steven Gibbs claims that the effectiveness of his Hyper-Dimensional Resonator (HDR) is influenced by the user's intention. According to Gibbs and those who support his theories, the device works by generating electromagnetic fields that interact with the user's consciousness. The user's focus, intent, and mental state are said to play a crucial role in achieving the purported effects of time travel or interdimensional exploration.
 
SergiusPaulus said:
So if they succeed in sending a particle to the past how would they be able to identify the particle as having arrived in the past? Can ā€œintentionā€ to send a particle to a closer future from a farther time in the future allow us to witness the arrival of the particle?
One example is you strongly intend to send a particle in 5 minutes to only 3 minutes in the future. Can you observe the particle arriving in 3 minutes? Thatā€™s using human intention. Is the HDR influenced by human intention of the person using the HDR?
I would imagine a device that you could ā€œelectronicallyā€set to send the particle from 5 minutes to 3 minutes might be a different result. Technology versus intent.
Click to expand...

Good question. Are they randomly sending it or do they have a destination in mind?
 
In a testing environment I would think it would be a designated sending device and receiving device in a test lab. Imagine inventing the modem. Maybe they need to MOdulate the particle and DEModulate it in some fashion in order to work. Or Encapsulate it with something. Not sure if the particle alone would travel but who knows.
 
SergiusPaulus said:
So if they succeed in sending a particle to the past how would they be able to identify the particle as having arrived in the past? Can ā€œintentionā€ to send a particle to a closer future from a farther time in the future allow us to witness the arrival of the particle?
One example is you strongly intend to send a particle in 5 minutes to only 3 minutes in the future. Can you observe the particle arriving in 3 minutes? Thatā€™s using human intention. Is the HDR influenced by human intention of the person using the HDR?
I would imagine a device that you could ā€œelectronicallyā€set to send the particle from 5 minutes to 3 minutes might be a different result. Technology versus intent.
Click to expand...

I would suggest that you go read about the experiment. Your statements indicate that you have not.
 
I saw the news when it came out about sending a particle into the past.

Disclosure of public information regarding something like "Practical/Conventional" time travel, would be awesome right now.
 

Top