Re: The Creation of Man
a) Genesis does not explain the existence and longevity of dinosaurs on this planet. Man's inhabitance and position as dominant species on earth in terms of time is miniscule by comparison. That doesn't seem to fit the OT's version of creation, or it's purpose.
B) There is a "gap" in evolutionary development between the primate and man. Nobody has successfully explained that leap in intelligence. Yet, man was created "in God's image". If God is a physical being (or species with a collective consciousness), and God's DNA were crossed with a primate, would it not possibly explain this evolution?
c) If Eve was created by using Adam's rib, would that not be further evidence of this crossing?
Think for a moment about all the evidence that has been put forward in support of UFO sightings. In fact, think about the common visual description that comes to mind when we think of an alien. Big head, large dark eyes, small chin, etc. You know the drill. The most common description given in a sighting report....
Now consider what we might look like IF the DNA of that alien were crossed with a primate?
d) Moses and the burning bush - If you were living in the time of Moses, how do you think you would perceive an alien ship? Might it look like a "burning bush"? When the stone tablets were created, what technology might have "burned in" the commandments and cut the tablets for him?
e) The OT in many places references "chariots of fire" in the sky during battles. hmmmm....
f) Thinking about miracles, lets look at the parting of the Red Sea....If "God the alien" were about, might not his/their ship have the ability to part it? In fact, thinking about almost ANY miracle ever mentioned in the old or new test., could similar intervention explain it?
Now to shatter the bubble. The above really does give some "physical grounding" and potentially explains where man came from. It even fits (much better than what's been offered) the explanations in the OT. What it does NOT explain is, if the above implications are true, then.....
WHO OR WHAT CREATED THEM!
hehehe
GL,
Z-
Consider this:
a) Genesis does not explain the existence and longevity of dinosaurs on this planet. Man's inhabitance and position as dominant species on earth in terms of time is miniscule by comparison. That doesn't seem to fit the OT's version of creation, or it's purpose.
B) There is a "gap" in evolutionary development between the primate and man. Nobody has successfully explained that leap in intelligence. Yet, man was created "in God's image". If God is a physical being (or species with a collective consciousness), and God's DNA were crossed with a primate, would it not possibly explain this evolution?
c) If Eve was created by using Adam's rib, would that not be further evidence of this crossing?
Think for a moment about all the evidence that has been put forward in support of UFO sightings. In fact, think about the common visual description that comes to mind when we think of an alien. Big head, large dark eyes, small chin, etc. You know the drill. The most common description given in a sighting report....
Now consider what we might look like IF the DNA of that alien were crossed with a primate?
d) Moses and the burning bush - If you were living in the time of Moses, how do you think you would perceive an alien ship? Might it look like a "burning bush"? When the stone tablets were created, what technology might have "burned in" the commandments and cut the tablets for him?
e) The OT in many places references "chariots of fire" in the sky during battles. hmmmm....
f) Thinking about miracles, lets look at the parting of the Red Sea....If "God the alien" were about, might not his/their ship have the ability to part it? In fact, thinking about almost ANY miracle ever mentioned in the old or new test., could similar intervention explain it?
Now to shatter the bubble. The above really does give some "physical grounding" and potentially explains where man came from. It even fits (much better than what's been offered) the explanations in the OT. What it does NOT explain is, if the above implications are true, then.....
WHO OR WHAT CREATED THEM!
hehehe
GL,
Z-
