Obviously observed reality could be a fantasy because so far you have not bothered to try to disprove that, you might call that "nonsense" but if insults are the only proofs you can prove you are misleading yourself and cannot be helped; debates are the process of providing relavent proofs for or against. First, "shouldn't" a scientist or somebody that studies the scientific method recognise the inherent flaws of that system which not a philosophy that is meant to be used to prove that the observations are accurate, of course going on the assumption that your senses are not being alter which the person who wrote that philosophy specifically stated, which you should determine what is supposed to be obvious for yourself. That is not science's domain, other philosophies provide proofs for or against, instead of qouting from scientific theories that have no relavence qoute the actual philosophies for or against. It seems you do not know even the names of these philosophies yet hope that I am incorrect and try to convice yourself of that, well you know nothing of those philosophies so you have not questioned that much.It's not about me "liking' what you wrote.
It's about your complete detachment from observed reality.
Personally, I don't care at all if you want to live in a fantasy. I respond to nonsense such as yours because I don't "like" the idea that somebody else could be mislead by your obvious foolishness.
this is all you have to say? The only person in a fantasy here is you, the person that can't even justify that there senses are not or being manipulated is the person who is foolish and living in a care free world. Some statements about clocks ticking does not dig you out of the hole you did not realize you fell into, you are not acting like a scientist, you are not relying cool rational analysis.
Sorry, no. Time dilation happens every, single time a particle is accelerated in a particle accelerator. Particles with very short half lives come into existence and last longer before decay than they would without the acceleration. In fact, in the case of some observed particles, scientists actually rely on time dilation to slow the particle's clock so they even have time to observe it.
what was I refering to? Your senses not that. what does that prove? Peoples senses were used to observe the tools, to build the tools, even to think of the concept of gravity, to see the measurement, are the senses accurate, relying on theories determined by senses does not answer the question, are yours senses accurate, which is a very basic thing which science does not address in any theory by the way you should know if and you by some small chance disgree qoute the sciencefic method and give some good sources this time which I doubt since I studies science for years, you can't just ignore to feel better and verbally smear people that bring up the question, its unpreffessional and a slave to your emotions.
If there were no time dilation through gravitation, then you need to explain why clocks on GPS satellites run faster than clocks on Earth. Every reading has to correct for this error.
tools are tools, tools can break down or just be influenced by something other then you think is influencing that, its just logic.
Regarding the rest of your drivel, solipsism doesn't explain anything. Of course, if you'd prefer that there be no explanation (as I indicated earlier,) then solipsism is your only possible position.
The rest, well all you have done is qoutes some scientific THEORIES that have no relavence as a response to questioning weather your senses can be manipulated or not. The theories are well described and understood yet they are theories that are created and tested using a limited amount of tools that you can't measure the accuracy of in a limited amount of space, do the so called laws of physics apply outside this solar system? I don't know, scientists don't know, you don't know.
please elaborite instead of saying all these things that you are not providing reasons for, how is solipsism drivel? Are you just going to keep saying that think its an actual proof until the other party can't say anything anymore because you keep trying to pass of insults and irrelavent statements as proof?
People who question a little are small, people that question their questions are medium, people that question everything are large.