Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
The Multiverse
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mthamson" data-source="post: 172707" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>Timeflipper, my apologies. I do not mean to express as obfuscated statements. I am happy to explain any statements in further detail. I did not wish to apply conjecture to the discussion. However, since it is a point of interest, I can explain what we do know and think we know about the recrystallization phenomenon. The topic is dense, so I will try to resolve to simpler terms, there is some summary as well.</p><p></p><p>Particles within a target have state information transposed to energies. These energies are pushed over branes in the method I described prior. It is our general understanding that although sent as a waveform, the information that the higher order dimensions influence is particle spins. Specifically, higher order dimensions seem to exclusively restrict fractional spins. For example, bosons have full integer spins, let us use use a value of 1. The lesser probability applied to the particle pushes the particle in a dimension that does not permit full integer spins. For example, 1/12th spins not equivalent to 1.0 and 0.5 multiples. In this instance, let us say it fits as a spin of 1 and 1/12. The particle is pushed over the brane boundary as prior explained. We know that the particle sheds this fractional spin and returns to a lower dimension back to a spin of 1.0. However, we do not see any emission accounting for the 1/12 energy in either brane. </p><p></p><p>We know that the particle and the dimension are indistinguishable as explained by singular-string theory. All dimensions, particles and energies are permutations of this singular string. Our hypothesis is that the 1/12 spin energy is the energy cost to bridge the target and origin brane dimension for that singular particle. The spent energy links then fills both sections of the dimension causing it collapse. A new dimension will fill the void, but the initial channel is destroyed. The new particle now sits in the target brane stripped of the 1/12 spin and cascades to lowest energy dimensions. Due to the adjacent proximity of the collection of particles, the base states realign causing the reassembly of the sent object.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mthamson, post: 172707, member: 10291"] Timeflipper, my apologies. I do not mean to express as obfuscated statements. I am happy to explain any statements in further detail. I did not wish to apply conjecture to the discussion. However, since it is a point of interest, I can explain what we do know and think we know about the recrystallization phenomenon. The topic is dense, so I will try to resolve to simpler terms, there is some summary as well. Particles within a target have state information transposed to energies. These energies are pushed over branes in the method I described prior. It is our general understanding that although sent as a waveform, the information that the higher order dimensions influence is particle spins. Specifically, higher order dimensions seem to exclusively restrict fractional spins. For example, bosons have full integer spins, let us use use a value of 1. The lesser probability applied to the particle pushes the particle in a dimension that does not permit full integer spins. For example, 1/12th spins not equivalent to 1.0 and 0.5 multiples. In this instance, let us say it fits as a spin of 1 and 1/12. The particle is pushed over the brane boundary as prior explained. We know that the particle sheds this fractional spin and returns to a lower dimension back to a spin of 1.0. However, we do not see any emission accounting for the 1/12 energy in either brane. We know that the particle and the dimension are indistinguishable as explained by singular-string theory. All dimensions, particles and energies are permutations of this singular string. Our hypothesis is that the 1/12 spin energy is the energy cost to bridge the target and origin brane dimension for that singular particle. The spent energy links then fills both sections of the dimension causing it collapse. A new dimension will fill the void, but the initial channel is destroyed. The new particle now sits in the target brane stripped of the 1/12 spin and cascades to lowest energy dimensions. Due to the adjacent proximity of the collection of particles, the base states realign causing the reassembly of the sent object. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
The Multiverse
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top