Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
We've been looking at the CERN LHC all wrong...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="8thsinner" data-source="post: 255863" data-attributes="member: 15138"><p>One problem the military seems to have always had is the delusion that more and bigger is better, more power, more speed, more electrons. The humble bee doesn't rely on power to create its own antigravity effect is uses simple the geometry of two counter rotating wind vortexes, both of which are within hearing ranges and no where near the khz ranges, though one of them can only be heard by the very young. </p><p>I wouldn't deny for stargates there is a necessary requirement of more power but there is an elegance to the math of it that I think and hope remains elusive for any of these scientists working at cern or otherwise connected to darpa or other military funding. </p><p></p><p>Not sure about the 11.6 though, in geometric harmonics that is the same as 116, which is 6 larger than one of the base harmonics necessary for antigravity, though I have no clue what harmonic is needed for making synthetic portals I do know that if nature can do it on occasion then it may relate to the 110 hz vortex in antigravity systems. </p><p>If you have a ring measuring that wavelength, and lets assume the harmonic is relevant then the difference between them is 6, which is 1/60 in degrees, meaning it would take 60 cycles before you would be piling the nodal point of the wave on top of itself. But, the nodal point here would actually be moving in retrograde, so it would actually take 60 cycles of 60 before it meets itself back at clock zero, which is 3600 which has all sorts of interesting harmonic connections to time and the clock right so, I do find that interesting. I've never looked at the wavelength and it's length before. </p><p></p><p>One thing I have no idea about is whether or not the 1,5,7,11 harmonics of base 12 in dna structures only relates to dna or not, I actually very much doubt it though. But what other harmonic ratios would be required to match the (I dont' know what it would be called) mean average I guess of the three waves making the one wave between them. By that I mean, using the 1,5,7,11 model, if you plot only the opposites 1/7 and 5/11, then the exact middle of those two waves is really a way of reducing the data to its even simpler one wave form. The growth of all dna seems to follow a pattern but it's a pattern that all matter must also be able to work with in all it's different geometry and not interfere with the dna either. </p><p>But if eulers interscalar cubes and roots formula also plots the same three wave one wave reduction form to stabilize electrons and protons then it's reasonable in my mind to assume that if dna and the building blocks of matter itself use the same geometric encoding structures then perhaps and probably time and space frequencies use the same key, because as hard as it is to find these two keys to begin with, it's utterly bloody simple too and in the most organic way it reduces to even easier calculations. </p><p></p><p>So yeah anyway, if anyone is even still following, if this key form also underlies time/space frequency geometry, which wave form is it being plotted in this 60x60 cycle. If anyone has good math skills here then let me know the answer, maybe we can backwards engineer and what they are trying to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="8thsinner, post: 255863, member: 15138"] One problem the military seems to have always had is the delusion that more and bigger is better, more power, more speed, more electrons. The humble bee doesn't rely on power to create its own antigravity effect is uses simple the geometry of two counter rotating wind vortexes, both of which are within hearing ranges and no where near the khz ranges, though one of them can only be heard by the very young. I wouldn't deny for stargates there is a necessary requirement of more power but there is an elegance to the math of it that I think and hope remains elusive for any of these scientists working at cern or otherwise connected to darpa or other military funding. Not sure about the 11.6 though, in geometric harmonics that is the same as 116, which is 6 larger than one of the base harmonics necessary for antigravity, though I have no clue what harmonic is needed for making synthetic portals I do know that if nature can do it on occasion then it may relate to the 110 hz vortex in antigravity systems. If you have a ring measuring that wavelength, and lets assume the harmonic is relevant then the difference between them is 6, which is 1/60 in degrees, meaning it would take 60 cycles before you would be piling the nodal point of the wave on top of itself. But, the nodal point here would actually be moving in retrograde, so it would actually take 60 cycles of 60 before it meets itself back at clock zero, which is 3600 which has all sorts of interesting harmonic connections to time and the clock right so, I do find that interesting. I've never looked at the wavelength and it's length before. One thing I have no idea about is whether or not the 1,5,7,11 harmonics of base 12 in dna structures only relates to dna or not, I actually very much doubt it though. But what other harmonic ratios would be required to match the (I dont' know what it would be called) mean average I guess of the three waves making the one wave between them. By that I mean, using the 1,5,7,11 model, if you plot only the opposites 1/7 and 5/11, then the exact middle of those two waves is really a way of reducing the data to its even simpler one wave form. The growth of all dna seems to follow a pattern but it's a pattern that all matter must also be able to work with in all it's different geometry and not interfere with the dna either. But if eulers interscalar cubes and roots formula also plots the same three wave one wave reduction form to stabilize electrons and protons then it's reasonable in my mind to assume that if dna and the building blocks of matter itself use the same geometric encoding structures then perhaps and probably time and space frequencies use the same key, because as hard as it is to find these two keys to begin with, it's utterly bloody simple too and in the most organic way it reduces to even easier calculations. So yeah anyway, if anyone is even still following, if this key form also underlies time/space frequency geometry, which wave form is it being plotted in this 60x60 cycle. If anyone has good math skills here then let me know the answer, maybe we can backwards engineer and what they are trying to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
We've been looking at the CERN LHC all wrong...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top