Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
What If We're Missing A Sense?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Carl Miller" data-source="post: 99862" data-attributes="member: 4986"><p>Are we in need of a new sense, a channel of perception which would allow us to expand our perceptible ability to the extent it would enable us to understand the meaning of life?</p><p>Could any new sense empower us (with new valuable data) enough to make us responsive to the gnawing challenges we are facing today?</p><p></p><p>Any new sense incorporated in our physiology stemming ramifications in our brain so that it would allow us to expand our consciousness, or our perceptible range ?</p><p>One thing can be considered: the new sense acquired the expanded consciousness experienced would be limited by one main thing: our ego.</p><p></p><p>The ego has a way to filter new data sorting it out in the archives of our background or conditioning-product of thousand years of tradition, religious culture, preconcepts learned. This is the store house of our unconscious. This is the framework in which new data will be fit in, adapted or discarded. New rags can be sown and patched onto old clothing. That's how we wish to adequate weird realities to fit in what we wish to believe.</p><p>There's also the observer issue. The observer will judge the observed according to the store house of knowledges accepted consensually what we call culture.</p><p>Conflict is created since the gap between 'what should be' will never fill up the new challenges we face every moment. Ideal and facts create conflict since we will be struggling to fit new challenges in old formats. That wont do. The observer distorts the observed no matter how powerful the observer can be. I mean no matter how many new senses of perception show up enhancing our brain expanding our perception of reality as it appears to our senses what we call as phenomena. Old senses can be revisited and harnessed or external technological devices can be aggregated to human brain. But limitations imposed by the observer or ego can not be defeated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Carl Miller, post: 99862, member: 4986"] Are we in need of a new sense, a channel of perception which would allow us to expand our perceptible ability to the extent it would enable us to understand the meaning of life? Could any new sense empower us (with new valuable data) enough to make us responsive to the gnawing challenges we are facing today? Any new sense incorporated in our physiology stemming ramifications in our brain so that it would allow us to expand our consciousness, or our perceptible range ? One thing can be considered: the new sense acquired the expanded consciousness experienced would be limited by one main thing: our ego. The ego has a way to filter new data sorting it out in the archives of our background or conditioning-product of thousand years of tradition, religious culture, preconcepts learned. This is the store house of our unconscious. This is the framework in which new data will be fit in, adapted or discarded. New rags can be sown and patched onto old clothing. That's how we wish to adequate weird realities to fit in what we wish to believe. There's also the observer issue. The observer will judge the observed according to the store house of knowledges accepted consensually what we call culture. Conflict is created since the gap between 'what should be' will never fill up the new challenges we face every moment. Ideal and facts create conflict since we will be struggling to fit new challenges in old formats. That wont do. The observer distorts the observed no matter how powerful the observer can be. I mean no matter how many new senses of perception show up enhancing our brain expanding our perception of reality as it appears to our senses what we call as phenomena. Old senses can be revisited and harnessed or external technological devices can be aggregated to human brain. But limitations imposed by the observer or ego can not be defeated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
What If We're Missing A Sense?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top