Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
What is fourth dimension?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Orpheus Rex" data-source="post: 198473" data-attributes="member: 4500"><p>No.</p><p></p><p>First, I think that relies on assumptions that are not falsifiable, but entirely mythological in nature.</p><p></p><p>Second, not every cause needs a cause.</p><p></p><p>Third, not everything can be broken down into an infinite amount of smaller parts. In fact, it's possible that nothing may be broken down infinitely. Either way, it's a fallacy as it ignores the existence of wholes. Wholes are not reducible to parts, if you atomize a human you don't continue to have a human. If you have an infinite regress of parts, you have nothing. I'm not sure if it would be categorized as a kind of mereological nihilism.</p><p></p><p>Fourth, I don't think the logic works. If there were to be worlds that aren't logical so that there is 'knowing' allowing for a world for logic, then firstly these could never be interacted with as interaction would mean that logic would apply them. And there would be no means for properly discussing such as the word 'exist' (def: 'to stand up from') doesn't apply. As such, there is not kind of 'access' that would exist for the 'needs to know' assumption.</p><p></p><p>I've heard better critiques, but that's off the top of my head.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Orpheus Rex, post: 198473, member: 4500"] No. First, I think that relies on assumptions that are not falsifiable, but entirely mythological in nature. Second, not every cause needs a cause. Third, not everything can be broken down into an infinite amount of smaller parts. In fact, it's possible that nothing may be broken down infinitely. Either way, it's a fallacy as it ignores the existence of wholes. Wholes are not reducible to parts, if you atomize a human you don't continue to have a human. If you have an infinite regress of parts, you have nothing. I'm not sure if it would be categorized as a kind of mereological nihilism. Fourth, I don't think the logic works. If there were to be worlds that aren't logical so that there is 'knowing' allowing for a world for logic, then firstly these could never be interacted with as interaction would mean that logic would apply them. And there would be no means for properly discussing such as the word 'exist' (def: 'to stand up from') doesn't apply. As such, there is not kind of 'access' that would exist for the 'needs to know' assumption. I've heard better critiques, but that's off the top of my head. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
What is fourth dimension?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top