Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
??? What Is Gravity ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Opmmur" data-source="post: 54779" data-attributes="member: 13"><p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">SCIENCE and MATH WEEKLY</span></strong></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Volume 7, Issue 22 — March 8,1967 </span></strong></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #ffffff"><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"><strong>© 1967, American Education Publications </strong></span></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">ASSAULT ON GRAVITY </span></strong></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">New investigations into gravity throw sizable doubt on Einstein's Theory of Gravity. </span></strong></span></p><p></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Faithful readers of SCIENCE and MATH WEEKLY know a great deal about the big new experimental push against the mysteries of gravity. They also know that there was practically no serious experimentation between Newton and the present day. Results have come sooner than anyone expected. Last January Dr. R.H. Dicke of Princeton rocked the world of physics with experimental evidence that Einstein's theory of gravity (General Relativity) did not correct an effect long observed in the behavior of the orbit of Mercury. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Mercury moves quickly around the sun in an elliptical path, like a horse running around a racetrack. This race track (orbit) is also slowly swinging around in space. It is this slow turning, only about 1,000" of arc per century, that causes all the trouble. We can attribute the swing to the pulls of the planets, but when the homework is all in, we can account for only a part of the 1,000" ' There is a big fat 43.1' not accounted for. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Einstein's gravity theory was hailed and accepted when it exactly accounted for the 43.1". But now Dicke has found that the sun is not spherical It has a slight bulge around the equator. This bulge also helps move the racetrack around. The unexplained error is now about 39 of arc. A small amount, perhaps, but larger than the limits of our observations and computing abilities. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">A new theory of gravity must now be sought. Readers of SCIENCE and MATH WEEKLY will know that there are many alternate theories available. The problem is to choose the right one. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Dr. Hill of Wesleyan University (Conn.) is now conducting a similar experiment to see how much the sun's mass deflects starlight passing near the solar body. The results (due in a year or two) may also rock our confidence in a part of Einstein's picture of gravity. </span></strong></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Despite statements in almost all books, attempts to measure this gravitational deflection of starlight by photographing stars near the sun during a total eclipse have been failures. The efforts of measurement have been as large as the effect sought. It is improper to say the eclipse pictures provide any proof for Einstein. </span></strong></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Opmmur, post: 54779, member: 13"] [CENTER][COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]SCIENCE and MATH WEEKLY[/FONT][/B][/COLOR][/CENTER] [CENTER][COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]Volume 7, Issue 22 — March 8,1967 [/FONT][/B][/COLOR][/CENTER] [CENTER][COLOR=#ffffff][FONT=Arial][B]© 1967, American Education Publications [/B][/FONT][/COLOR][/CENTER] [CENTER][COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]ASSAULT ON GRAVITY [/FONT][/B][/COLOR][/CENTER] [CENTER] [/CENTER] [CENTER][COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]New investigations into gravity throw sizable doubt on Einstein's Theory of Gravity. [/FONT][/B][/COLOR][/CENTER] [COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]Faithful readers of SCIENCE and MATH WEEKLY know a great deal about the big new experimental push against the mysteries of gravity. They also know that there was practically no serious experimentation between Newton and the present day. Results have come sooner than anyone expected. Last January Dr. R.H. Dicke of Princeton rocked the world of physics with experimental evidence that Einstein's theory of gravity (General Relativity) did not correct an effect long observed in the behavior of the orbit of Mercury. [/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]Mercury moves quickly around the sun in an elliptical path, like a horse running around a racetrack. This race track (orbit) is also slowly swinging around in space. It is this slow turning, only about 1,000" of arc per century, that causes all the trouble. We can attribute the swing to the pulls of the planets, but when the homework is all in, we can account for only a part of the 1,000" ' There is a big fat 43.1' not accounted for. [/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]Einstein's gravity theory was hailed and accepted when it exactly accounted for the 43.1". But now Dicke has found that the sun is not spherical It has a slight bulge around the equator. This bulge also helps move the racetrack around. The unexplained error is now about 39 of arc. A small amount, perhaps, but larger than the limits of our observations and computing abilities. [/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]A new theory of gravity must now be sought. Readers of SCIENCE and MATH WEEKLY will know that there are many alternate theories available. The problem is to choose the right one. [/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]Dr. Hill of Wesleyan University (Conn.) is now conducting a similar experiment to see how much the sun's mass deflects starlight passing near the solar body. The results (due in a year or two) may also rock our confidence in a part of Einstein's picture of gravity. [/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff][B][FONT=Arial]Despite statements in almost all books, attempts to measure this gravitational deflection of starlight by photographing stars near the sun during a total eclipse have been failures. The efforts of measurement have been as large as the effect sought. It is improper to say the eclipse pictures provide any proof for Einstein. [/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
??? What Is Gravity ???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top