Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Why did Titor say 'go north'?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 6395" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Why did Titor say 'go north'?</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What many fail to take into account is that Titor is speaking of two things at once. The first thing he refers to is the civil war, which is between the urban and rural populations, but in which the rural population has swelled from the rebels leaving the cities. The second thing is the nuclear war, which hits the cities only. It is absurdly selfcentered to cast the entire drama into terms of one's own survival. You cannot read the clues to figure out what's going to happen just in order to save your own rear end. No one is going to want you if you're in it for yourself, at least not among those who are even now trying to rebuild society.</p><p></p><p>If you think of the whole thing in terms of the nuclear war only, you are undoubtedly one of those for whom the safety of others is a very low priority. This attitude would not be confined to just the holocaust, or its possibility, but to the way in which you regard others now, in a relatively peaceful society. It would not matter to you whether or not those around you are being deprived of their civil rights, for example, so long as you yourself were safe from the police and authorities.</p><p></p><p>The only way to go about this in my opinion is to join together now to avert the catastrophe while it is still hypothetical or only <em>possible</em>. In other words, we must all survive together somehow. The way we are divided is by demonizing some of us, by allowing our leaders to pit us against one another. The people are all together on the fundamentals; the corporate bosses of the nation are on the other side, and intend to make use of us. In many ways, the bombs have already fallen, and we are already in ruins.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 6395, member: 42"] [b]Why did Titor say 'go north'?[/b] What many fail to take into account is that Titor is speaking of two things at once. The first thing he refers to is the civil war, which is between the urban and rural populations, but in which the rural population has swelled from the rebels leaving the cities. The second thing is the nuclear war, which hits the cities only. It is absurdly selfcentered to cast the entire drama into terms of one's own survival. You cannot read the clues to figure out what's going to happen just in order to save your own rear end. No one is going to want you if you're in it for yourself, at least not among those who are even now trying to rebuild society. If you think of the whole thing in terms of the nuclear war only, you are undoubtedly one of those for whom the safety of others is a very low priority. This attitude would not be confined to just the holocaust, or its possibility, but to the way in which you regard others now, in a relatively peaceful society. It would not matter to you whether or not those around you are being deprived of their civil rights, for example, so long as you yourself were safe from the police and authorities. The only way to go about this in my opinion is to join together now to avert the catastrophe while it is still hypothetical or only [i]possible[/i]. In other words, we must all survive together somehow. The way we are divided is by demonizing some of us, by allowing our leaders to pit us against one another. The people are all together on the fundamentals; the corporate bosses of the nation are on the other side, and intend to make use of us. In many ways, the bombs have already fallen, and we are already in ruins. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Why did Titor say 'go north'?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top