Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Political Exchange
YouTube's threat to free speech
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kairos" data-source="post: 170626" data-attributes="member: 10263"><p>This of course misses the entire point. YouTube was the first to capture the massive network externality and now there can be no viable alternatives.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore. NO, they are not free to discriminate in that way. They want to be treated as common carriers so that they are not held liable for what is published on their site. But they act like a newspaper in censoring conservative and other right wing voices, which is supposed to relieve them of their common carrier status. Furthermore, there exists nothing in their contract that states that they actively discriminate against conservative voices. People purchase equipment and invest in this platform according to that contract, and then YouTube pulls the rug out from under them -- which is fraud.</p><p></p><p>If they want to behave this way, then they ought to lose their common carrier status. Full stop.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kairos, post: 170626, member: 10263"] This of course misses the entire point. YouTube was the first to capture the massive network externality and now there can be no viable alternatives. Furthermore. NO, they are not free to discriminate in that way. They want to be treated as common carriers so that they are not held liable for what is published on their site. But they act like a newspaper in censoring conservative and other right wing voices, which is supposed to relieve them of their common carrier status. Furthermore, there exists nothing in their contract that states that they actively discriminate against conservative voices. People purchase equipment and invest in this platform according to that contract, and then YouTube pulls the rug out from under them -- which is fraud. If they want to behave this way, then they ought to lose their common carrier status. Full stop. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Political Exchange
YouTube's threat to free speech
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top