Unintentional
Active Member
Gravity
I have been thinking of this theory for a while and some things seems to have click after reading Grayson's posts about entropy.
It have been proven by observation and measurement that massive objects slow down time in their vincinity.
Most problems with UFT is a way to incorporate gravity.
My theory is gravity is not a force like EM or anything else, but a function of time.
All things are spinning or have things orbiting around them. Imagine a simple hydrogen atom. The central proton is spinning and it has a single electron orbiting. As this atom aproaches a massive object (or actually any object with mass) one side (the side closest to the object with mass) of it will have a slower time than the other side. To conserve angular momentum, the atom MUST move closer to the object with mass. Incidently the object with mass moves closer to the atom, but if it is more massive it will move proportionally less.
This theory holds up with massive objects pulling on other massive objects. If each object is made of a trillion atoms or more, they are all spinning and they all have one side that is slower in time than the other side. They each must converse anguler momentum and so the object as a whole (but in reality it is each tiny atom acting in concert with the others) moves towards other objects.
To see this conservation of angular momentum yourself: Tie a ball to a string. Swing the ball by the string really fast. Smack the ball in midmotion with your hand or appoach a wall and have the wall hit the ball. Don't smack it hard enough to stop the ball, but only graze it and slow it down. As the ball slows down, your hand is "pulled" toward the wall or hand or whatever you used to slow down the ball. This is the conservation of angular momentum.
Another way of looking at this is picture your self standing on the earth (or sitting). The top of your head is actually in a faster time than your feet. The difference might be 1 billionth or 1 trillionth of a second difference per second, but the difference IS there. Remember gravity is very very very VERY weak compared to the other forces. As the bottom of all your spinning atoms are in a slower time than the tops of them, they are being pulled downward.
I don't recall all the formulaes off hand, but if there are any really scientific types out there, is there anything basically wrong with my theory?
I have been thinking of this theory for a while and some things seems to have click after reading Grayson's posts about entropy.
It have been proven by observation and measurement that massive objects slow down time in their vincinity.
Most problems with UFT is a way to incorporate gravity.
My theory is gravity is not a force like EM or anything else, but a function of time.
All things are spinning or have things orbiting around them. Imagine a simple hydrogen atom. The central proton is spinning and it has a single electron orbiting. As this atom aproaches a massive object (or actually any object with mass) one side (the side closest to the object with mass) of it will have a slower time than the other side. To conserve angular momentum, the atom MUST move closer to the object with mass. Incidently the object with mass moves closer to the atom, but if it is more massive it will move proportionally less.
This theory holds up with massive objects pulling on other massive objects. If each object is made of a trillion atoms or more, they are all spinning and they all have one side that is slower in time than the other side. They each must converse anguler momentum and so the object as a whole (but in reality it is each tiny atom acting in concert with the others) moves towards other objects.
To see this conservation of angular momentum yourself: Tie a ball to a string. Swing the ball by the string really fast. Smack the ball in midmotion with your hand or appoach a wall and have the wall hit the ball. Don't smack it hard enough to stop the ball, but only graze it and slow it down. As the ball slows down, your hand is "pulled" toward the wall or hand or whatever you used to slow down the ball. This is the conservation of angular momentum.
Another way of looking at this is picture your self standing on the earth (or sitting). The top of your head is actually in a faster time than your feet. The difference might be 1 billionth or 1 trillionth of a second difference per second, but the difference IS there. Remember gravity is very very very VERY weak compared to the other forces. As the bottom of all your spinning atoms are in a slower time than the tops of them, they are being pulled downward.
I don't recall all the formulaes off hand, but if there are any really scientific types out there, is there anything basically wrong with my theory?
