Beholder
Senior Member
I'm currently working on three theories for how the big bang left more matter than anti-matter. Trying to be less egocentric than established science that assumes that we are never on the opposite side of things.
* Rounding error from living in a discrete time-space fabric. I accidentally had a big bang occuring in a computer simulation, which left more matter than anti-matter because I used a discrete time-space fabric where adding and removing matter had rounding errors and time shifts. The same could happen in a reality where the time-space fabric is a discrete graph and space is just an illusion of folded connectivity.
* Creating the big bang required more energy than what existed, and we are the anti-matter and anti-energy. Makes me wonder if the +- electric pole mixup was a mistake or a greater insight of electrons being anti-electrons.
* Big bang left an opposing combination of matter and anti-energy or vice versa. Explaining why we have positive and negative charges. Electrons are a separate type of quark unrelated to up and down quarks, so the grouping might be wrong.
* Rounding error from living in a discrete time-space fabric. I accidentally had a big bang occuring in a computer simulation, which left more matter than anti-matter because I used a discrete time-space fabric where adding and removing matter had rounding errors and time shifts. The same could happen in a reality where the time-space fabric is a discrete graph and space is just an illusion of folded connectivity.
* Creating the big bang required more energy than what existed, and we are the anti-matter and anti-energy. Makes me wonder if the +- electric pole mixup was a mistake or a greater insight of electrons being anti-electrons.
* Big bang left an opposing combination of matter and anti-energy or vice versa. Explaining why we have positive and negative charges. Electrons are a separate type of quark unrelated to up and down quarks, so the grouping might be wrong.