Correct. Even though it's clear 99% of these guys are full of it, it still generates crazy, interesting discussions that a lot of us want to enjoy... Without the interruptions of having the holes in the story torn apart. The goal is to try and separate the fantastic from the debunking without eliminating either one.So, in other words, you want folks to treat Hoaxers with respect.
An example would be "I Am John Titor" where the discussion contains ONLY posts that contribute to the thread in a positive way (i.e. ones that does not call for the OP to defend themselves).What are the parameters of pointing out lies in their Hoax?
Parallel to that would be [DEBUNKING] I Am John Titor, a thread where the usual challenges are made and the discussion seeks to dissect the OPs claims via logic.
Posts of the latter nature made in the former thread will be moved, and vice-versa. Hopefully that makes sense, I'm at work typing between people walking by my office.

Think of one as for creative writing, the other for critical thinking.
Edit: Whoops, Num beat me to it.
*shakes fist*