Krish
Senior Member
how would you explain the fact
Rules are different...no point talking about it, since you are gone....and thank you for the communication....
how would you explain the fact
Was it something i said?
As it happens I'm very familiar with leonardo da Vinci'a painting of Mona Lisa and many of his other works.
Are you sure you are not mistaken and meant to refer to his painting of madonna and child with the infant St John?
This is the painting that depicts an object in the sky that looks suspiciously to modern eyes as what could be interpreted as a UFO.
Mona Lisa is an unfinished work which was changed and reworked many times presumably by da Vinci but this is an assumption on the part of art historians as very little is factually known about the painting.
Many of da vinci's works contain odd artefacts
Giving conspiracy theorists ample opportunity for speculation.
In actuality these speculations are mostly ignorance of renaissance symbolism, however there are some mysterious artifacts depicted by da Vinci and his contempries which are difficult to explain.
However this is not evidence of ufos being time travellers, its very interesting speculation and open to interpretation but a lack of explanation is not evidence of anything.
I am not aware of any evidence that links ufos with time travellers and until I am presented with some I will keep an open mind and view ufos as the intriguing mystery they present themselves to be and not impose assumption or wild speculation on the mystery.
A+B=?? Until I know what the value of A and B are I can't determine their combined value.
If you work on assumptions based on speculation you can assume the values of A and B to be any value you wish and therefore come to any combined value to prove what you want to be true regardless of the actual truth.
It is very important that we engage in critical thinking and base our arguments on evidence. otherwise we will never unravel these mysteries and may miss out on some amazing discoveries that could ultimately lead us to understanding our place in the universe.
Such a child would still age and grow up at the same rate as usual. It just wouldn't seem so to those not traveling with him.Physical time travel in this Universe is impossible...(like a car that flies) but we can think about it and enjoy the show....
Perhaps because...the Universe is doing a work for its growth ....like a child growing up. What is the point of time travel and not grow up? Imagine a six year old kid learned time travel and set it a personal loop to not grow up....would not be an adult....kinda thing...
I've watched it happen hundreds of times here Doc. It comes with the territory (paranormal.)This is what I hate about the internet, give people anonymity and the technology to freely express themselves through it and the most imaginative thing they think of doing with it is talking crap in some sad hope that someone else will buy into there crap... all I was trying to do when I started this thread was to provoke philosospical and hopefully intelligent discussion.. I'm out of here!
As it happens I'm very familiar with leonardo da Vinci'a painting of Mona Lisa and many of his other works.
Are you sure you are not mistaken and meant to refer to his painting of madonna and child with the infant St John?
This is the painting that depicts an object in the sky that looks suspiciously to modern eyes as what could be interpreted as a UFO.
Mona Lisa is an unfinished work which was changed and reworked many times presumably by da Vinci but this is an assumption on the part of art historians as very little is factually known about the painting.
Many of da vinci's works contain odd artefacts
Giving conspiracy theorists ample opportunity for speculation.
In actuality these speculations are mostly ignorance of renaissance symbolism, however there are some mysterious artifacts depicted by da Vinci and his contempries which are difficult to explain.
However this is not evidence of ufos being time travellers, its very interesting speculation and open to interpretation but a lack of explanation is not evidence of anything.
I am not aware of any evidence that links ufos with time travellers and until I am presented with some I will keep an open mind and view ufos as the intriguing mystery they present themselves to be and not impose assumption or wild speculation on the mystery.
A+B=?? Until I know what the value of A and B are I can't determine their combined value.
If you work on assumptions based on speculation you can assume the values of A and B to be any value you wish and therefore come to any combined value to prove what you want to be true regardless of the actual truth.
It is very important that we engage in critical thinking and base our arguments on evidence. otherwise we will never unravel these mysteries and may miss out on some amazing discoveries that could ultimately lead us to understanding our place in the universe.
when I said monaliza I meant the paintings from Leonardo it can be the other one but what I'm trying to tell you is that its depicted everywhere in the bible too with moses and the cane and the voices on the mountain and ely the prophet who flewwwww up on a magic carpet.. I'm joking of course but you understand what I'm talking about.. the consistent guidance and "magic"..
and A+B = anything you want it to be.. you think based on planet earth science.. it only applies to humans and to your planet and even on your planet its not perfect as will be proven in the 'future'
its evolvement of the species.. through time travel.. and its very possible.
brownie.. let me ask you something
400 years ago.. before the apple fell on that human head of mr newton.. no one knew shit about shit no modern science no nothing..
4 0 0 human years ago you were a damn stick and stones
4 0 years from now you have a town on mars
4 0 0 years from now the computer and you.. there is no difference.. this is where you find time travel
I just try to get it in this life time in the present body.. that's all
There is no reason known in Physics why time travel would be impossible. Maybe it is, but science hasn't said this.