Angelface239
Active Member
Okay.Timey McTime.
Harte
Okay.Timey McTime.
Harte
Timey McTime.
Harte
What was his name?
great jokesIf so, haven't seen anyone admit to it or if they do, how do we know we should believe them?
what is the point in doing so if that person could be a time traveler but could be lying about a future, ironically would a time traveler post here just to explain the future to people he or she does not know perhaps instead of millions of other sites; what are the odds? why liberal, why not republican. You seem to hate CNN yet "trust" fox news, why "trust" articles that you have never verified in person anyways, it seems people just cherry pick and choose to believe whichever outlet endorses that view, and without any ability to fact check as online articles can never be fact checked online people just hope that a certain outlet is correct. read my article. liberals to the best of my knowledge want to get rid of those insurance companies that seem to do just invent better ways to charge more money and at the same time cause more people to buy more products, and as a result millions did not have insurance. Free market if not regulated ends of like that sometimes, and if money equals free speech plutocracy wins. rep and dem party perhaps controlled by corpurations, in other words an endless battle to prevent both sides from doing anything about money equals free speech and so on.Every time we ask natural, curious questions, the time travelers and "anonymous" people throw toddler tantrums because we aren't allowed to question -- you know, typical fascist, liberal ideology. Why on earth would we want to question and learn? (sarcastic)
What, exactly, would be the difference between the above scenario and one in which the poster is simply lying?what is the point in doing so if that person could be a time traveler but could be lying about a future, ironically would a time traveler post here just to explain the future to people he or she does not know...
You assume far too much about Paula here.why liberal, why not republican. You seem to hate CNN yet "trust" fox news, why "trust" articles that you have never verified in person anyways, it seems people just cherry pick and choose to believe whichever outlet endorses that view, and without any ability to fact check as online articles can never be fact checked online people just hope that a certain outlet is correct.
If you take a look at margins, the Starbucks you're sitting in while you complain about gouging from insurance companies has triple (or more) the profit margin of the average insurance company. A company is a thing. It is actually established for the sole purpose of making money. No money, no company. No company - you get to go to your witch doctor neighbor for treatment and to the barber for surgery, like it used to be before for-profit insurance companies were established.read my article. liberals to the best of my knowledge want to get rid of those insurance companies that seem to do just invent better ways to charge more money and at the same time cause more people to buy more products, and as a result millions did not have insurance.
Political contributions are certainly protected as free speech. The very most important kind of free speech is political speech. How can you imagine this being any other way? You would curtail speech, exactly like Paula was talking about. Fascism.Free market if not regulated ends of like that sometimes, and if money equals free speech plutocracy wins. rep and dem party perhaps controlled by corpurations, in other words an endless battle to prevent both sides from doing anything about money equals free speech and so on.