Dulux
Junior Member
There are many considerations.
I have no place of belief in anything 'Arcane' aside from Aliens manipulating Government with the NSA. That's it. I believe nothing really- no religion, no Government, no Psychic, not even you my friend I'm sorry, it's nothing personal.
The above post that strikes at Obama was only done so out of comparing quotes from Delores Cannon's book to current events. Indeed, Obama did a lot of these things that were called out in 1994, and the articles from our current news of the past 6 years declares it.
I wrote no opinion or perspective, I only included the comparison of information.
It's a very convenient coincidence.
But I do believe the act of coincidence is impractical by circumstance because it's a critical process explained to be so, and therefore the information presented has validity to me due to it's many coincidences, not as a means to exploring the acts of a an Anti-Christ, but the exploration of the facts behind a person who is anticipated to cause serious extra-ordinary problems; not as a means to believe anything, but to consider it as a higher possibility because it passes several critical observations, authenticity methods, and etc...
Anything is open to being under scrutiny by simply having a better perspective of what already makes sense.
I have no place of belief in anything 'Arcane' aside from Aliens manipulating Government with the NSA. That's it. I believe nothing really- no religion, no Government, no Psychic, not even you my friend I'm sorry, it's nothing personal.
The above post that strikes at Obama was only done so out of comparing quotes from Delores Cannon's book to current events. Indeed, Obama did a lot of these things that were called out in 1994, and the articles from our current news of the past 6 years declares it.
I wrote no opinion or perspective, I only included the comparison of information.
It's a very convenient coincidence.
But I do believe the act of coincidence is impractical by circumstance because it's a critical process explained to be so, and therefore the information presented has validity to me due to it's many coincidences, not as a means to exploring the acts of a an Anti-Christ, but the exploration of the facts behind a person who is anticipated to cause serious extra-ordinary problems; not as a means to believe anything, but to consider it as a higher possibility because it passes several critical observations, authenticity methods, and etc...
Anything is open to being under scrutiny by simply having a better perspective of what already makes sense.