Re: "Lib'rul" media refuses to call christian terrorist, the "T" word
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Darkwolf\")</div>
So how's that different than what rudolph did?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Darkwolf\")</div>
I mean you just made the claim Rudolph was the first of his kind and pretending like Mcveigh never happened. Ineteresting you mention many of the terrorism statues being in response to McVeigh, so why isn't Rudolph a terrorist again?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Darkwolf\")</div>
So why were the people responsible for the 93 WTC attacks labeled by the media and tried for terrorism just a couple years ago, for crimes committed in 93? Are you flat out denying this hypocrisy?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Darkwolf\")</div>
Well, it was a terrorist attack, what would you call it?[/b]
So how's that different than what rudolph did?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Darkwolf\")</div>
What do you mean? Many of the terrorism statutes on the federal books were written in response to what McVeigh did. He was tried on terrorism charges as they existed prior to his committing his crime. [/b]
I mean you just made the claim Rudolph was the first of his kind and pretending like Mcveigh never happened. Ineteresting you mention many of the terrorism statues being in response to McVeigh, so why isn't Rudolph a terrorist again?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Darkwolf\")</div>
None of the new post 911 statutes can be used against Rudolph. He committed his acts before the passage of the Patriot act and similar legislation. You cannot try somone according to law which did not exist when they committed the crime. In order for them to get their domestic terror test case, somone must commit an act of terror now. Then they are subject to the PA.[/b]
So why were the people responsible for the 93 WTC attacks labeled by the media and tried for terrorism just a couple years ago, for crimes committed in 93? Are you flat out denying this hypocrisy?