Questions for John Titor

I am open for work and my work in the area has advanced signifigantly since the patent filing. (many "would be" Time Travellers have called me, emailed me or texted me at all hours of the day and night (one even using my FM radio while I was driving) and traded info for supposed assistance with technical challenges mostly with the VGL and target singularity charge decay problem) Provided I had a lab and materials I would work for minimum wage, room and board....after all what is money once you have a working time displacement device. I am easy to reach.
 
I’m probably a youth minister trying to preach to a choir with this post.

Can we create nuclear fusion technology?

AI was saying I think that nuclear fusion can ultimately result in a black hole if I read correctly? I do see nuclear fusion related articles.

But the process talks about stars versus a lab environment. Sounds like the end of a fusion reaction results in a black hole as gravity around it envelopes it?

AI.

The process by which nuclear fusion transitions into conditions leading to a black hole is tied to the lifecycle of massive stars and the exhaustion of nuclear fuel. Here's a step-by-step outline of how this transition can occur:



Nuclear Fusion in Stars:



Main Sequence: Stars spend most of their lives fusing hydrogen into helium in their cores. The energy produced from fusion creates an outward pressure that balances the inward pull of gravity.

Advanced Fusion Stages: In more massive stars, once hydrogen is depleted, the core contracts and heats up, leading to successive stages of fusion (helium to carbon, carbon to neon, oxygen, and eventually to iron).

Iron Core Formation:



End of Fusion: Fusion processes in stars continue until iron is formed in the core. Iron cannot undergo fusion to release energy because fusing iron consumes energy rather than releasing it. This halts the fusion process.

Core Collapse:



Inability to Counteract Gravity: With no energy being produced from fusion, the outward pressure stops. The core is no longer able to counteract gravitational forces.

Collapse: The core begins to collapse under its own gravity, compressing to extremely high densities and temperatures.

Supernova Explosion:



Rebound Shockwave: The collapsing core can reach such extreme densities that it forms neutron-rich matter. In some cases, the core collapse is halted temporarily, causing a rebound effect that generates a shockwave, resulting in a supernova explosion.

Ejecting Outer Layers: The outer layers of the star are expelled in the explosion, but the core continues collapsing.

Formation of Neutron Star or Black Hole:



Neutron Star: If the remaining core mass is below the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit (around 2-3 solar masses), it forms a neutron star. Neutron degeneracy pressure can support the core against further collapse.

Black Hole: If the core's mass exceeds this limit, neutron degeneracy pressure is insufficient to stop the collapse. The core continues collapsing into a singularity, forming a black hole.
 
Aside from nuclear fusion…

So if black holes are related to objects of great mass like stars then would an element like this be relevant or is that a different type of mass ?

AI

The element with the highest atomic mass in the periodic table is Oganesson (Og), which has an atomic number of 118. Oganesson is a synthetic element, meaning it is not found in nature and has to be created in a laboratory. Its most stable isotope, Oganesson-294, has a mass number of 294 atomic mass units (amu).
 
Can we generate particles in a container? Generate heavy particles, and collapse them?

If gravitational fields are weak can the electromagnetic force surround the particles within the container while also surrounding the gravity around those particles and then shrink in size forcing the gravity to collapse those particles. Like gravity engulfing a star.
Use electromagnetic force to distort the gravity?
AI
Weakness of Gravity: Gravity is much weaker compared to electromagnetic forces. For example, the electromagnetic force between two electrons is approximately 10^40 times stronger than the gravitational force between them.

So can we collapse electrons? Would that have a similar result?
 
SergiusPaulus said:
Do the powerful radio communications installations such as SETI equipment have the ability to communicate with other human communications? Could Titor have communicated with equipment in the 1970’s to prepare for his trip? SETI equipment listens for a variety of signals.

In general can SETI equipment communicate with communication from another timeline or universe in the context of the multiverse?
Click to expand...
You need a delta T with a double tracking time event analogous meter attached to it. If they have satellite dishes in that reality, if you can capture signal and re-parse this to per sample from storage tap, yeah one can do this.

If this did exist, then this would have been an ops so classified.
 
SergiusPaulus said:
Can we generate particles in a container? Generate heavy particles, and collapse them?

If gravitational fields are weak can the electromagnetic force surround the particles within the container while also surrounding the gravity around those particles and then shrink in size forcing the gravity to collapse those particles. Like gravity engulfing a star.
Use electromagnetic force to distort the gravity?
AI
Weakness of Gravity: Gravity is much weaker compared to electromagnetic forces. For example, the electromagnetic force between two electrons is approximately 10^40 times stronger than the gravitational force between them.

So can we collapse electrons? Would that have a similar result?
Click to expand...
Bose-Einstein condensate at high energies sufficent to accrete ambient matter at the Eddington limit are one candidate, but this is a non-trivial engineering problem. (they couldn't/wouldn't say more) I was told by one self proclaimed TT that the "trick" was special configuration of extra dimensions to lower the Planck scale to the TeV range (GKP solutions) ... normally the minimum energy of a microscopic black hole is 1016 TeV (equivalent to 1.6 GJ or 444 kWh) but the GKP solution in higher dimensaions can lower it to 14 TeV for proton–proton collisions and 1,150 TeV for Pb–Pb collisions with a Schwarzschild radius of 148 fm. Most of the questions I were asked in return were about VGL recalibration vs. a known standard and swappping the reference and target singularity as the target singularity had reached near critical charge saturation.
 
It takes a particle accellerator to create the singularities but once they are created the target singularity (not the reference) is bombarded by time coupled (that is timing of the dual emitter) cooper pairs to create gravitons (the math works) spin-2 stress–energy tensor conservation in the local higgs field, The cooper pairs must each be Spin-1 (no Spin-0 allowed there is a filter for this) so it takes 2 Spin-1 cooper pairs to result in one Graviton, the Electron Mass contributes as it is absorbed.... there is no other particle acceleration in the C204 in my design
 
Last edited:

Top