Questions for John Titor

SergiusPaulus said:
Does the C204 include particle acceleration, colliding particles within its process, to form the singularities?
Click to expand...
No it does not. There's inter-collisional fields caused from the action of the Tipler Towers. This action projects a field that co-stasis upon each other a as a pronounced non-exact locale set of hot radiuses. They're a power feedback power take-up similar to how fusion generated power was envisioned by experiments with the early TOKAMACK fusion reactor. * Is known by the writeup in Popular Science as (The star take-up cell) or portion of the then proposed fusion reactor that translated heat to energy.

There's use of enhanced rare element composite laminations in that unit. What isn't shown in the cut-away drawing but proven on Art Bell's old BBS with the request from the second Titor for bunt out damaged boards request, are a series of up to three circuit boards that sit side saddle within that military utility case.

Again, regardless of one's vector into the ends of their C-204's travel path that there's a locale of either times, or time space held within that measured jump, where the second Titor encountered a massive solar flair. Flares provide both energy & overvoltage to the equipment they effect, but what one has to remember, is that the time machines here was a set event in time. So the sub-actions placed as sub-time components of action were stretched out and extrapolated to function, even with integrated circuitry board function impaired with circuit damaged.

So, the landing or arrival was good, but to use that machine again, those undisclosed about E-boards had to be replaced. There is where you get your balance of collisional fields dynamics, as these fields, like the outer peel of an onion skin, are the only represented edifice that purports the functioning Kerr's black holes approximated function.

If one can affect those double simulated non-certain non-exact locales, plus maintain keeping an isolated special relatively sphere, then one can transport within that specialized sphere of relativity. *There's really no particle generation of the range of super heavy particles, it's how the towers generate the production of those fields by location simulation of extreme resistance heat. This is why it's told that the 204 carried a clump of dirty with it ever time it jumped.

With the assistance of the e-boards one is controlling a dynamic, not exotic particle generation.

A famous say, 'Quantum foam makes me roam'. Pamela Moore past member of The Time Travel Institute, during one of her philosophical muses. She also was a smart cookie but somehow experienced in this field. Other says by Pam. 'You know' your'e probably not the only one who's time traveled here'?!
Click to expand...
 
Marlin Pohlman said:
It takes a particle accellerator to create the singularities but once they are created the target singularity (not the reference) is bombarded by time coupled (that is timing of the dual emitter) cooper pairs to create gravitons (the math works) spin-2 stress–energy tensor conservation in the local higgs field, The cooper pairs must each be Spin-1 (no Spin-0 allowed there is a filter for this) so it takes 2 Spin-1 cooper pairs to result in one Graviton, the Electron Mass contributes as it is absorbed.... there is no other particle acceleration in the C204 in my design
Click to expand...
What is the geneses of the Kerrs double black hole nonlocality as opposed to a black hole even though on the outer veneer levels the action of the black hole strips the constituency of matter?

This means if you have a special relativity housed within an approximation of a Kers double black hole, then on start-up one must inject at length, as starting matrix such as deuterium.

What if the beginning of a double Ker's Balck hole's not dependent upon injected particles to start the super gravity simulation? e.g. The true nature of the Kers BH is gravity cut, which interreacts with ANY matter, not as a child of particle injections, whether they're single or double black hole representations.
 
lamdo263 said:
No it does not. There's inter-collisional fields caused from the action of the Tipler Towers. This action projects a field that co-stasis upon each other a as a pronounced non-exact locale set of hot radiuses. They're a power feedback power take-up similar to how fusion generated power was envisioned by experiments with the early TOKAMACK fusion reactor. * Is known by the writeup in Popular Science as (The star take-up cell) or portion of the then proposed fusion reactor that translated heat to energy.

There's use of enhanced rare element composite laminations in that unit. What isn't shown in the cut-away drawing but proven on Art Bell's old BBS with the request from the second Titor for bunt out damaged boards request, are a series of up to three circuit boards that sit side saddle within that military utility case.

Again, regardless of one's vector into the ends of their C-204's travel path that there's a locale of either times, or time space held within that measured jump, where the second Titor encountered a massive solar flair. Flares provide both energy & overvoltage to the equipment they effect, but what one has to remember, is that the time machines here was a set event in time. So the sub-actions placed as sub-time components of action were stretched out and extrapolated to function, even with integrated circuitry board function impaired with circuit damaged.

So, the landing or arrival was good, but to use that machine again, those undisclosed about E-boards had to be replaced. There is where you get your balance of collisional fields dynamics, as these fields, like the outer peel of an onion skin, are the only represented edifice that purports the functioning Kerr's black holes approximated function.

If one can affect those double simulated non-certain non-exact locales, plus maintain keeping an isolated special relatively sphere, then one can transport within that specialized sphere of relativity. *There's really no particle generation of the range of super heavy particles, it's how the towers generate the production of those fields by location simulation of extreme resistance heat. This is why it's told that the 204 carried a clump of dirty with it ever time it jumped.

With the assistance of the e-boards one is controlling a dynamic, not exotic particle generation.
Click to expand...
Ok....you sound alot like one of the TT's who contacted me several years ago, at least in content. Your writing style differs somewhat and your choice of descriptors (The Tipler Towers). The event matches the TT who also cited the solar flare, and the laminates. So I have to ask, are you stranded or are you an active researcher or someone privy to the knowledge of a traveller. I get calls because it is known in the future I filed the patent application and kept up on the research. I also agreed to relay info between would be TT's understanding that much of what I would be fed would be BS from some pretty imaganitive role players. Sometimes someone gives me a grain of truth or a market prediction as a bonified but market predictions vary and are inaccurate as the VGL is not always at 98%...I will listen regardless.
 
SergiusPaulus said:
So the graviton has not been proven? Yet. We “rely” on its existence rather than prove its existence.
Click to expand...

Yes! It is hilarious how much science writers will do just to entertain you. Just remember MASS has never been proven to exist. It is just used to create equations.
 
Relying on things that don’t exist (not proven) reminds me of scene where indiana Jones has to cross a bridge he can not see. But once he crosses it he does throw dirt on it to prove it exists visually. Can we apply visual “markers” to things we can not prove but allow the markers to let us see those things or measure them.


 
SergiusPaulus said:
Relying on things that don’t exist (not proven) reminds me of scene where indiana Jones has to cross a bridge he can not see. But once he crosses it he does throw dirt on it to prove it exists visually. Can we apply visual “markers” to things we can not prove but allow the markers to let us see those things or measure them.


Click to expand...

Only if using facts would that approach work. I think first we have to remove all the make believe to actually see what we do have.
 
You are continuing to do the same thing as the make believers. Stop making things up!

Use the Facts! Everything we have today was made from using real facts!
 

Top