Questions for John Titor

lamdo263 said:
What is the geneses of the Kerrs double black hole nonlocality as opposed to a black hole even though on the outer veneer levels the action of the black hole strips the constituency of matter?

This means if you have a special relativity housed within an approximation of a Kers double black hole, then on start-up one must inject at length, as starting matrix such as deuterium.

What if the beginning of a double Ker's Balck hole's not dependent upon injected particles to start the super gravity simulation? e.g. The true nature of the Kers BH is gravity cut, which interreacts with ANY matter, not as a child of particle injections, whether they're single or double black hole representations.
Click to expand...
I don't claim to have all the answers. I am good at back engneering and research but some of this requires a real specialist
 
Marlin Pohlman said:
Ok....you sound alot like one of the TT's who contacted me several years ago, at least in content. Your writing style differs somewhat and your choice of descriptors (The Tipler Towers). The event matches the TT who also cited the solar flare, and the laminates. So I have to ask, are you stranded or are you an active researcher or someone privy to the knowledge of a traveller. I get calls because it is known in the future I filed the patent application and kept up on the research. I also agreed to relay info between would be TT's understanding that much of what I would be fed would be BS from some pretty imaganitive role players. Sometimes someone gives me a grain of truth or a market prediction as a bonified but market predictions vary and are inaccurate as the VGL is not always at 98%...I will listen regardless.
Click to expand...
Reference Marcia Bartusiak's first book on the Hawking black hole investigative group. Her finding coalesced in her book, were that because of the character of a black hole being created, that this edifice is a super density gravity based placed on time space. Furthermore, what information she came out with on Hawking radiation was that this was a process of ingestion, expression from matter being taken apart expressed, as a fountain.

So, to gain power ere, one does not gain power by a fusion process, although there's feedback on the difference power produced from the simulate double Kerrs. This is what most aren't getting. How the 204 works, is probably based within the Tipler towers as an exacting angle of incidence that pushes a field that invest in some kind of self-feeding simulated field, as a cycle that supports the Kers double field. *However' the beginning of this field could be from a large truck battery which is amped up in power by some process.

If you're going to use a fusion power cell, then this unit would have to have the space roughly of a large bagel with accessories placed on it as part of that power feed, 'If needed at all'? *Note video source on the simulated building of the Iron Man arch reactors on file, I haven't the time to look u it up but have seen it. *Do you need that power if you can get it from the heat put off by the double Kers as an energy return shunt to run the machine?

Note in videos there was an amateur tinkerer that made a very close simulation to the mini arc fusion reactor shown in the Iron Man movie series. But this would place the fusion deuterium feed in a miniature apparatus for ignition feeds. Maybe they found a way to accomplish getting a power back feed, in not using a fusion reactor at all? Maybe it's all in how that angle of projected incidence ray of transplaced power is from the 204 time travel case, but this ray at first would have to be mild, but the coalesced to an exacting point later on, as expressed as fields?

I'm not a player here, I just know what I'm talking about.

On Marcia's books she really knew what she was talking about, as she retranslated the preliminary info from the Hawking Black Hole Investigative Group. She knew what she was saying and gave the reader a run for their money. I can't say enough about her book for a good bread & butter understanding of BHs. Marcia Bartsuiacks frist book, Thursday's child - Bing
 
Last edited:
Marlin Pohlman said:
I don't claim to have all the answers. I am good at back engneering and research but some of this requires a real specialist
Click to expand...
Ha ha' it's like making a do-do in the woods. You drop your drawers expecting things to go well and a smooth move will be the result. Then all of a sudden, this creature known as time travel bites you in the arse and if the bite is just so; man' do you become interested'. And not before long your'e trying to figure out things that are pert near imposable. Please believe me when I say, there's not sin in that!
 
When I made the comment about dying gravity particles it was a suggestion in an effort to visually try to confirm gravity in a particle form. Here are other examples of dying particles.

Me: Can particles be dyed in an effort to see them?

AI:

Yes, particles can be dyed or labeled to make them visible under various types of microscopy. This process is widely used in biological and material sciences to visualize and track particles that are otherwise too small or transparent to be seen. Here are some methods used to dye or label particles:

1. Fluorescent Dyes:

- Fluorescent dyes are commonly used to label biological molecules, cells, and other particles. These dyes emit light of a specific wavelength when excited by a light source of a different wavelength. Fluorescence microscopy is then used to detect the labeled particles. Examples include DAPI, which binds to DNA and emits blue light, and FITC, which binds to proteins and emits green light.

2. Quantum Dots:

- Quantum dots are semiconductor nanoparticles that exhibit unique optical properties, including high brightness and stability. They can be conjugated to biological molecules for use as fluorescent labels in imaging applications. Their emission wavelength can be tuned by changing the size of the quantum dots, allowing for multiplexing with different colors .

3. Gold Nanoparticles:

- Gold nanoparticles can be used as contrast agents in electron microscopy due to their electron-dense nature. They can be conjugated to antibodies or other molecules to specifically label cellular structures. Gold nanoparticles can also be used in optical imaging techniques due to their unique light scattering properties .

4. Stains for Electron Microscopy:

- In electron microscopy, particles can be stained with heavy metals like osmium tetroxide or uranyl acetate, which provide contrast by scattering electrons. These stains are particularly useful for visualizing cellular structures and macromolecular complexes at high resolution .

5. Magnetic Nanoparticles:

- Magnetic nanoparticles can be labeled and used in conjunction with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize particles in a non-invasive manner. These particles can be conjugated with biological molecules to target specific tissues or cells

These labeling techniques enable researchers to study the behavior, interactions, and functions of particles in a variety of settings, ranging from live-cell imaging to the analysis of complex materials. The choice of labeling method depends on the specific application and the type of microscopy being used.
 
Marlin Pohlman said:
I don't claim to have all the answers. I am good at back engneering and research but some of this requires a real specialist
Click to expand...
Your problem here is the question, is a mini-fusion power source required inside of the 204 time travel unit, or can power be opted from the creation of the Ker's double black hole, which is in the many thousands of degrees once one creates them.

I do have engineering course under my belt, but a qualifier authority is going to be hard to find here as it was said by Pam More, a guessed at John Titor contact that Titor's world was pretty well devastated by atomic war. So, what the chain of events add up to is anyone you can grab from the street who knows what they're talking about.

If you want expensive champagne, with ties & tucks formals in a posh limo, your'e more than likely not going to get that here.
 
I just think that if quantum mechanics is going to go so far as to describe the theoretical graviton such as by giving its spin characteristics and calling it massless then an effort should be made to confirm the particles existence. Other particles are studied with the help of using dyes of various type. If the photon is massless also, can it be observed? AI explains yes.

Does Time travel rely on the existence of gravity particles?
 
SergiusPaulus said:
I just think that if quantum mechanics is going to go so far as to describe the theoretical graviton such as by giving its spin characteristics and calling it massless then an effort should be made to confirm the particles existence. Other particles are studied with the help of using dyes of various type. If the photon is massless also, can it be observed? AI explains yes.

Does Time travel rely on the existence of gravity particles?
Click to expand...
The math for my version of the C204 does but since filing the patent I have come to believe more and more in Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble theory, Hopf fibration and Venkatraman Gopalan's idea of exchnging Minkowski 'sspacetime for the view of the Universe as a 27D general relativistic spacetime crystal, that is blending of two separate observations of the same event, two observers exchange time coordinates but keep their own space coordinates. You would still have spin "particles" which would would be in essence "Wavelet soliton vorticese" or "Vortes Rings" aka "heavy soliton" carrying charge and angular momentum in up to 27 dimensions. (FYI: +/- Charge may be just another type of Angular Momentum in a Non-Trivial Dimension)...I suggest reading https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/iucr/doi/10.1107/S2053273321003259 and https://www.fuw.edu.pl/~suszek/pdf/Urbantke2003.pdf then listen to the Joe Rogan Eric Weinstein Podcast for a laymans explanation. If you combine Venkatraman Gopalan and Urbantke's paper then Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble theory, Kozrev and all the others start to make sense. Even the Scalar lectures of Tom Bearden come into focus with Gopalan and Urbantke. (also many AI engines have been seeded to avoid these topics, they used to produce good research but they have need intellectualy neutered and academically censured...I do my own reading and math and run custom AI engines when I need them)
 

Top