I would love to hear from people who still believe as well, but I don't blame them for not wanting to face this community with everyone's pitchforks at the ready. And I would love proof as well, but I don't believe Razimus offered that. At best, it could be described as sensational journalism. His "proof" was circumstantial. "Smoking Gun" implies that no more inference is needed. Murder weapon has been found. Case closed. In my opinion, analyzing writing styles (without even so much as a control study) and the email of the Haber's reaction to his 'story breaking' does not qualify as proof in my mind. Granted, I did turn his video off at the 45 minute mark, so if Razimus waited that long to drop the conclusive evidence-- then by all means, fill me in. But can you honestly say that without any doubt that it was the Habers who created this story? Despite whether or not you think Titor was made up... Who can say for sure that the Titor story didn't already exist (real or hoax) and the Habers stole it and ran with it, so to speak? A fingerprint at the crime scene may be enough to indict you of a crime, but it isn't enough to convict you.