šŸ“ŗ Video The Gateway Process: the CIA's Classified Space & Time Travel System That You Can Learn

Time doesn't work that way. Your questions are based on make believe assumptions. Stop doing that. Please stick to the reality we exist in.
How much time passes for a photon to travel millions and millions of miles? None. So we can transmit with no time passing. But what allows an element to pass through a reversal of time?
 
Maybe itā€™s a start. @Marlin Pohlman

Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communications refers to the hypothetical transmission of information at speeds exceeding the speed of light (299,792,458 meters per second). According to Einsteinā€™s theory of relativity, information cannot travel faster than light without violating causality (the principle that cause precedes effect). However, various theoretical models propose ways in which FTL communication might be possible.

### Theoretical Approaches to FTL Communication

1. Quantum Entanglement (Spooky Action at a Distance)
- When two particles are entangled, measuring the state of one instantly determines the state of the other, no matter the distance between them.
- However, no usable information can be transmitted faster than light because the measurement outcomes are random.

2. Tachyons
- Hypothetical particles that always move faster than light.
- If they exist, they could carry information faster than light, but no evidence supports their existence.

3. Wormholes (Einstein-Rosen Bridges)
- Theoretical shortcuts in spacetime that could allow instantaneous travel between two distant points.
- If stable, they could enable FTL communication by transmitting signals through them.

4. Warp Drive-Based Communication
- Concepts like the Alcubierre Drive propose bending spacetime to allow faster-than-light travel.
- If a similar mechanism could be used for signals, it might enable FTL communication.

5. Superluminal Electromagnetic Waves
- Some theoretical physics models propose special conditions where electromagnetic waves could travel faster than light in specific mediums.

### Challenges and Controversies
  • Causality Paradoxes: FTL communication could lead to violations of cause and effect, enabling paradoxes like receiving a message before it was sent.
  • Relativity Constraints: Special relativity forbids information transfer faster than light, making FTL communication seem impossible without breaking known physics.
  • Lack of Experimental Evidence: No verified experiment has demonstrated FTL information transfer.

### Science Fiction and Speculative Uses
  • Many sci-fi universes, such as Star Trek (subspace communication) and Dune (Holtzman Effect), depict FTL communication methods.
  • Some fictional systems bypass relativity through alternative dimensions or exotic physics.

While FTL communication remains speculative, ongoing research in quantum mechanics and theoretical physics continues to explore whether such methods might someday be possible.
 
Albert Einstein was deeply skeptical of what he called "spooky action at a distance," a term he used to describe quantum entanglement. He believed that quantum mechanics was incomplete and resisted the idea that two entangled particles could instantaneously affect each other across vast distances, seemingly violating the limit set by the speed of light.

### Einsteinā€™s Main Objections
1. Local Realism
- Einstein favored the idea that physical properties (such as position and momentum) exist independently of measurement (realism).
- He also believed that information should not travel faster than light (locality).

2. The EPR Paradox (1935)
- Along with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, Einstein formulated the EPR paradox, which argued that quantum mechanics allows for entangled particles to influence each other instantaneously.
- The paper concluded that quantum mechanics must be incomplete and that "hidden variables" might exist to explain entanglement without violating relativity.

3. Dislike of Probabilistic Nature
- Einstein famously said, "God does not play dice with the universe," expressing his discomfort with quantum mechanicsā€™ probabilistic nature.

### Later Developments
  • Bellā€™s Theorem (1964): Physicist John Bell showed that any theory preserving local realism would conflict with quantum mechanics. Experiments later confirmed quantum entanglement, supporting "spooky action at a distance."
  • Modern Quantum Physics: While Einstein was correct in questioning quantum mechanics' completeness, his skepticism about entanglement has been largely overturned by experimental evidence.

In summary, Einstein rejected "spooky action at a distance" as an indication that quantum mechanics was flawed or incomplete. However, later discoveries validated the phenomenon, proving that entanglement is real, even though it challenges classical physics. @Marlin Pohlman
 
I guess some of us are still living in the past the past the past. Well I guess the past just keeps passing. But now is the future due to the moment you are reading this.
 
Stars and planets. Alignment.
In the fiction movie Timeline the technology is based on identifying the alignment of stars and planets of the destination time. If Hollywood finds value in that science then maybe science should also consider that science. Where would Hollywood get that suggestion from? Do other non fiction entities use alignment other than ships from centuries ago? If we need alignments now or in the future theyā€™ve been recorded centuries ago for common travel.
 
Stars and planets. Alignment.
Presumably, we are little consciousnesses, flowing through our Life Streams, part of the cinema of the Spiral Time Streams contained within the Spiral Arms of the Milky Way, which is the so called Hologram, that we are flowing through.

Also, Electromagnetic Frequencies would travel along these same Spiral paths. So, if we wanted to send messages, forward or backward, on these Spiral Time Streams, we'd need to use electromagnetic frequencies or similar energies, that weren't confined by the Speed of Light.

We'd calibrate those frequencies in the direction of The Great Central Sun, in the center of the Milky Way, the direction from which we as consciousnesses, have been flowing from, containing our transmissions. And we'd have to somehow cause our transmissions to impinge on the particular Parallel Reality, in the specific location, that we wanted our transmissions to be received, by our parallel selves, located back on the Spiral Time Streams.

Have any of us, in this Reality, been receiving any such messages from our parallel selves, located further away from the center of the galaxy, within these Spiral paths? This wouldn't exclude the possibility of transmissions to and from Realities that aren't on our direct Spiral paths, but are in perpendicular locations, sideways from our particular spiral paths.
 
In the fiction movie Timeline the technology is based on identifying the alignment of stars and planets of the destination time. If Hollywood finds value in that science then maybe science should also consider that science. Where would Hollywood get that suggestion from? Do other non fiction entities use alignment other than ships from centuries ago? If we need alignments now or in the future theyā€™ve been recorded centuries ago for common travel.

I'm not talking about Hollywood.

The stars and planets are in a specific position at any point in time, forward or backward. Star databases can be used to choose dates to travel to. They are basically like a universal clock.
 

Top