Titor's 2001 Predictions Compared to 2011 Curent Time

titorite said:
It is queer...this thing... When it started I think JT gave away the NWO play book for the next 15 years... Those younger NWO power mongers saw their dreams and plans posted online by a person claiming to be a time traveller... Naturally he was ignored by all but us fringe types... Then they went ahead with their plots and plans adjusting and adapting as they do... then 03 came... the invasion became official... and I think thats when some of those NWO fucks started to take a second look. I think that is when they started making major adjustments to their plans and plots.

the mox radiation from fuckishima is still polluting the world... I begin to think about distilling my water now. And I wonder about the next generation..... the birth defects titor spoke of.. between the radiation and the corexit many many babies here in the US .....well.... it'll be bad.

Meanwhile the US is moving troops from Japan to Guam, phillipines and Australia. For the security of asia..... IT is not our place to provide asia with security ... unless by security we mean invasion.... and we normally do... invade that is.

Then their is the unrest here at home. Romney reminds me of Kerry. .... The Zimmerman case looks like it is a dog and pony show meant to incite strong emotions to be manipulated later. I am betting it will be a mistrial. Occupy still goes strong...

sigh...

He laid out their playbook... They ignored it at first... then they changed their plays. Now it is anyones guess.

The only thing I think is still on the board is the 2012 date.. That is geological and no planning can change or affect what the earth will do.

Everything else is bound to have had plan Bs enacted.... Will China still consider expansion into the south with new redeployments surrounding the territory they desire?

Israel has yet to enact their ultimate defence....so far as we know.

We don't have a female president yet... instead we have a (plan B) black president... still a first for the US... still, the power hungry (hillary) crave the drug of "control" and the stage does look as though it is being set for a VP switcheroo ... even so things still remain dramtically changed....
Click to expand...

I agree with most of the above. I wonder how much JT's presence here changed events on our Timeline. I do think those with the NWO agenda, be it within our government or where ever, must have taken a very serious look at what JT said about our future. They may have changed their strategies over it, which in turn would alter our Timeline even more so. John's presence here caused many changes in events on our World line, the ripple effect. It reminds me of an episode on the original Star Trek series where something changed their Timeline and Nazi's took over the world, but I can't remember the name of the episode.
 
It reminds me of an episode on the original Star Trek series where something changed their Timeline and Nazi's took over the world, but I can't remember the name of the episode.
Click to expand...

Patterns of Force: season 2 episode 50
It's actually a different planet than Earth, Ekos, where a missing Federation Officer influenced the planets people to follow a National Socialism, believing that Nazism, if it had been done "right", would have had a better outcome on Earth.
 
Peregrini said:
Patterns of Force: season 2 episode 50
It's actually a different planet than Earth, Ekos, where a missing Federation Officer influenced the planets people to follow a National Socialism, believing that Nazism, if it had been done "right", would have had a better outcome on Earth.
Click to expand...

Yes, that's it! Thanks for the info. :) I knew it happened on another planet, but I didn't say it, because I couldn't remember the details and I knew it would sound confusing.
 
No problem, Im a bit of a Trek nut. Welcome back Samstwitch. Believe it or not, I missed you. :( Though we didn't often agree I did enjoy your posts.:)
 
I know you guys already mentioned this, but I wanted to post the article. Of course the U.S. government never tells us the whole truth, so I wonder how widespread it really is.

Mad Cow in California.webp

Mad Cow Disease Confirmed In California Dairy Cow, USDA Says

04-24-2012 The USDA has confirmed that a case of mad cow disease was found in a California dairy cow. It is the fourth case of mad cow, or bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), found in U.S. cattle since the first in December 2003. Los Angeles-based Baker Commodities confirmed that the cow was discovered in a Hanford, Calif. transfer station after workers selected the cow for random sampling. The company does not yet know which farm the cow came from.

USDA Chief Veterinary Officer John Clifford said Tuesday afternoon that the cow did not enter the human food chain and that all U.S. meat and dairy supplies are safe. Further mitigating the risk to the public, milk does not transmit BSE.

According to the USDA, the animal's carcass is being held under state authority at a California rendering facility and will be destroyed. "It was never presented for slaughter for human consumption, so at no time presented a risk to the food supply or human health," Clifford said.

SOURCE: Mad Cow Disease Confirmed In California Dairy Cow, USDA Says
 
This is an interesting and on-going story. I don't often get too excited by news stories like this one but these words concern me a little.

The company does not yet know which farm the cow came from.

"It was never presented for slaughter for human consumption, so at no time presented a risk to the food supply or human health," Clifford said.
Click to expand...

That's a far reaching statement. If the animal was going to a rendering facility a single animal presented there would go into many different processes. Might one of them end up in human food? Hard to tell. So far only the brain (the reason there was so many cases in Europe. They have a nasty habit of eating animal brains. Yuck!) or spinal cord and fluid seem to carry the infection so maybe we are safe. I personally get a half beef and whole pig each spring from a farmer I have known for many years. I don't buy store meat.
 
Here's an updated article.

Mad cow discovery reignites debate: Are U.S. food-safety laws too lax?

04-29-2012 America's beef industry and federal agriculture officials spent much of the past week reassuring the public that the nation's meat supply is safe, after the announcement that a California dairy cow tested positive for mad cow disease.

But even as investigators from the U.S. Department of Agriculture continue to comb through the herd and the records at a Tulare County farm where the animal came from, the fourth case of mad cow disease detected in the U.S. since 2003 is sparking new debate about whether food-safety laws are adequate to protect public health.

Consumer groups argue that many of America's key meat safety standards are weaker than rules in Europe, Japan and other countries -- and that attempts to strengthen them have been blocked by the meat and ranching industries. The groups say:

The number of animals in the U.S. tested each year for mad cow disease is inadequate. The nation lacks a mandatory federal system to identify and track every cow. There are too many gaps in regulations affecting the quality of the feed that livestock eat.

"This shows the need for significant reform," said Michael Hansen, a senior scientist with Consumers Union, the advocacy arm of Consumer Reports magazine. "They need to take this seriously."

Just how officials discovered the cow was infected with an atypical version of the fatal brain disease is at the center of the debate over whether the U.S. testing program is sufficient: The cow was part of a random testing program in Hanford on its way to a rendering plant. While state and federal health officials said the discovery shows the program works, critics say it shows the positive result was nothing more than a lucky accident.

U.S. beef track record

Mad cow disease, formally known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, or BSE, can be transmitted to humans through eating meat tainted with infected brain or nerve tissue from an infected animal. It is not transmitted through consumption of milk, according to the World Health Organization.

U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and state and federal health officials say the public was not in danger because the California cow, a 10-year-old Holstein that died at the dairy farm, was heading for a rendering plant to be turned into fertilizer, pet food or another product, rather than meat for human consumption.

Furthermore, there has never been a confirmed case of mad cow disease connected with anyone eating U.S. beef. Three people in America have died of the disease over the past decade, but all spent time in England and Saudi Arabia, where they were believed to have caught it, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

What are the odds?

People should be more concerned with common food-borne diseases from bacteria such as E. coli or salmonella, said Dr. James Cullor, a professor of veterinary medicine at UC Davis.

"If you think of the number of meals you eat every day, and the number of people in the United States, the risk is about 1 in 1 billion" of getting mad cow disease, he said.

In contrast, each year about 48 million Americans are sickened and about 3,000 die of food-borne illnesses, according to the CDC. Last year, cantaloupes tainted by Listeria from a Colorado farm were responsible for 30 deaths. And in 2006, five people died and 205 were badly sickened from an outbreak of E. coli in bagged spinach from a farm in San Benito County.

But however low the risk is for mad cow disease, consumer and health groups note that during the major outbreak in the 1980s and 1990s in England, 150 people died, and 3.7 million cattle were slaughtered.

They say that to better ensure that the disease or rare strains, like the one in last week's incident, aren't spreading, the USDA should increase testing. Currently, only 40,000 cows a year are tested -- roughly 1 in 1,000 -- out of 34 million cows slaughtered in the U.S. each year.
Japan, however, tests every cow over 20 months of age, and European nations test all cattle over 30 months.

"The fact that they only test 40,000 animals and they found this case means that there could very well be others out there," Hansen said. "Think about it. If there is a single case out of 34 million animals that are slaughtered, what's the chance they found the only one?"

Beef industry weighs in

The USDA stepped up testing to 400,000 cows a year after the first U.S. case of mad cow disease was found in 2003 in Washington state, but then reduced it 90 percent by 2006 after only two cases were discovered nationwide.

In a famous case, the USDA even blocked one Kansas meatpacking company, Creekstone Farms, that wanted to test all of its animals in 2006 after the National Cattlemen's Beef Association complained that such a move could undermine confidence in other beef producers.
Beef producers say the current rules are higher than an international standard, however. And they emphasize that nobody has ever died from mad cow disease from U.S. beef. More tests would drive up food prices, they contend.

"When you see the risk is extremely low and the benefit to the public is virtually nonexistent because we've never had a case of the disease, you have to say, 'Is it worth the cost?' " said veterinarian Dr. Tom Talbot, a Bishop rancher and chairman of the National Cattlemen's Beef Association's Cattle Health and Well-Being Committee. "We don't need more regulations," he said.

Weak tracking system

Another point of controversy is the poor ability of the U.S. to track cattle. Six of the eight largest cattle exporters in the world -- including Australia, New Zealand, Argentina and Canada -- have mandatory systems to track each animal, record its age and other details. That way, when there's a disease outbreak, the animal's herd and farm can be quickly quarantined.

Even Botswana has a law that requires computer chips in every cow to track their origin. But the U.S. does not.

"The United States has first-world resources and technology but a Third World animal-identification system," said Sarah Klein, a food-safety attorney with the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a nonprofit group based in Washington, D.C.

"If American cattlemen suffer economic losses at the news of this discovery of BSE," she said, "they should blame only themselves and other opponents of a mandatory animal-identification system."

An effort to establish a national ID system several years ago failed when some cattle ranchers complained that mandatory tracking was a cumbersome federal intrusion into their business, and that ear tags with computer chips cost $2 to $3 each and can fall off.

The USDA has new rules, due out later this year, that would mandate better tracking, but only in cattle that cross state lines.
Finally, some advocates also are calling for tougher feed rules. After the British outbreak, when it was discovered that the disease spread from cattle eating feed made with the contaminated tissue of other cattle and sheep, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1997 banned the use of cattle tissue in cattle feed. But the law still allows such tissue in livestock feed for pigs, sheep and chickens. And cattle are often fed "chicken litter," a feed made of the feathers, feces and uneaten food from industrial poultry barns. Young calves also are given plasma from other cattle.

"We are what they eat," Klein said. "So let's make sure we close the loopholes."

SOURCE: Mad cow discovery reignites debate: Are U.S. food-safety laws too lax? - Inside Bay Area
 

Attachments

  • Mad Cow in California.webp
    Mad Cow in California.webp
    54.9 KB · Views: 2
TItor said
They are prepared for the ultimate defense. ... The last resort for a defensive Israel and its offensive Arab neighbors is to use weapons of mass destruction.
Click to expand...

PressTV - US to okay $1 billion for Israeli missile projects



The US House of Representatives is set to allocate nearly USD one billion for the 2013 fiscal year for Israel’s missile systems.

On Monday, the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee appropriated USD 947 million for the Iron Dome, “David's Sling” and a long-range Arrow missile program.
Click to expand...



Some plans change and some plans remain.

I for one think Titor was wrong about this though.... not what he was saying but his view point of the situation. BUt he would of grown up in these times...well times like these times... When america wants to consider everyone a shade darker than vanilla a terrorist. Sigh.... What ever timeline he returned too.. I doubt he returned to a free time... rather just another tyranny waiting to blossom.
 

Top