🚨 A.I. Might Put UFO Community At Risk 🚨

On Facebook, I talked with some people and they said that the generator AI can't do art as well as humans. But it's getting harder and harder to distinguish between AI art vs, human art.

If that's so, the government will make artificial UFOs that will be close to the real thing.
 
On Facebook, I talked with some people and they said that the generator AI can't do art as well as humans. But it's getting harder and harder to distinguish between AI art vs, human art.

If that's so, the government will make artificial UFOs that will be close to the real thing.

And when it DOES, it is stealing pictures off the internet as reference. Real artists are really upset about this copyright violation.
To make it genuine, you'd have to use a robot like Sophia who has been seeing the world on her own, and you'd have to block access to the
internet, I guess.
 
The government has CGI graphics they love so I guess gen AI probably would steal it's graphics as well by lower classes. CGI is very professional compared with Open AI. So the government should be smarter than Gen AI "artists" when it works with well defined CGI graphics.
 
The government has CGI graphics they love so I guess gen AI probably would steal it's graphics as well by lower classes. CGI is very professional compared with Open AI. So the government should be smarter than Gen AI "artists" when it works with well defined CGI graphics.
Well you would think it would be smarter, but it's never programmed with absolute objective truths in it, its nothing more than a learning code which can never say anything it's never been taught, kinda like how your supposedly not supposed to be able to dream a face you've never seen.
So its normally written to reflect subjective truths based on its programmers reality, or the reality of its intended viewers, in other words, to push an agenda. Both of these reality densities are low in vibration, 3d stuff.
At best it can cut and splice descriptions of things other people have seen but it won't be aware of the subtleties of the laws of nature and the higher dimensional stuff.
Also, its not like they're actually trying very hard, even they are getting lazy, just look at the dodgy nasa footage, or the fake rockets of elon.
Its been released to millions, you would think it would have teams of continuity experts checking and double checking things but they can't even be bothered.
Even ignoring the green screen errors, you have broken laws of physics everywhere, things don't move right, shadows don't reflect properly, flames have shadows, you will be able to see clouds with a hazy sun behind it and stuff. That doesn't happen in real life, clouds block the sun, flames are see through, water has not only ripples but converging and echoing ripples ...
 
Well you would think it would be smarter, but it's never programmed with absolute objective truths in it, its nothing more than a learning code which can never say anything it's never been taught, kinda like how your supposedly not supposed to be able to dream a face you've never seen.
So its normally written to reflect subjective truths based on its programmers reality, or the reality of its intended viewers, in other words, to push an agenda. Both of these reality densities are low in vibration, 3d stuff.
At best it can cut and splice descriptions of things other people have seen but it won't be aware of the subtleties of the laws of nature and the higher dimensional stuff.
Also, its not like they're actually trying very hard, even they are getting lazy, just look at the dodgy nasa footage, or the fake rockets of elon.
Its been released to millions, you would think it would have teams of continuity experts checking and double checking things but they can't even be bothered.
Even ignoring the green screen errors, you have broken laws of physics everywhere, things don't move right, shadows don't reflect properly, flames have shadows, you will be able to see clouds with a hazy sun behind it and stuff. That doesn't happen in real life, clouds block the sun, flames are see through, water has not only ripples but converging and echoing ripples ...
wow, who says you're not supposed to be able to dream about a face you've never seen?
I meet people who I've never met in real life in dreams all the time, many of whom are
just random strange people.
 
wow, who says you're not supposed to be able to dream about a face you've never seen?
I meet people who I've never met in real life in dreams all the time, many of whom are
just random strange people.
I don't know who said it first, it's just been floating around the psychology field for a while.
Its not true, I was only using the principle as an example above.

It became a phrase though I think only to justify their drugs and dismiss things like precognizance.
Dreams don't happen here on earth, they happen in other realms when your consciousness leaves here, so of course you're going to see people up there you've never seen down here, but you also probably see people up there that you have seen down here, old friends, current friends, family, future friends, even past life and future life partners and such.
 
Last edited:

Top