Thanks @TimeFlipper , no disrespect taken.No disrepect to you @Doc 05 but consider my simple point regarding what a "REAL" Time Machine would look like built by highly professional people using thousands of extremely high quality parts..
Personally, i do not believe that something cobbled together using 3 cheap potentiometers, a few diodes, an electrolytic capacitor plus a lump of metal used as an electro-magnet, could "accurately and safely" physically transport you to a place in the past or forwards in time and then return you safely...An analogy would be putting people into a flimsy little boat and letting them try to cross the Atlantic Ocean..
Yes of course everybody has the right to their own opinions and their personal beliefs, as for myself i believe in pragmatism, and will always warn people against purchasing anything that "looks and sounds too good to be true"...
I guess what you consider as "REAL".
If the intention of your Time Travel is to Observe past events; then the HDR can assist in facilitating that goal.
If your goal is Physical Time Travel, the HDR MAY act as a crude "mind to device" interface used to "tune" such devices as @Doctor Z 's "vehicle" time machine or @Imohd 's portal.
But on it's own, the HDR will never physically transport through time. Even in Steven Gibbs HDR instructions he states that in order to Physically Time Travel you require a "vortex" (on the day of the full moon).
That is why I have concentrated my HDR efforts as an adjunct to Remote Viewing or as an interface to a portal.
The HDR will never compare to the time travel efforts of governments; we do not have their budgets or knowledge base, but it's the best we got and it's a start.
Steve Gibbs was very hesitant for further investigation, experimentation, or aggressive study. My intention on the dissection of the HDR is to open the field for others to construct and study this device, so that one day it will become the "Model A Ford" of Time Travel Devices.
Thank you for your comments (and your warnings).
