Canadians find cure for cancer

kcwildman

Beastmaster
Messages
3,049
it seems the drug companys are not one bit intrested in a cure for cancer I just heard of this and when I did a little research found it to be not only true but rather old news to it was first reported in early 2007
Cheap, 'safe' drug kills most cancers - health - 17 January 2007 - New Scientist

Cheap, 'safe' drug kills most cancers
  • Updated 13:31 17 May 2011 by Andy Coghlan
  • For similar stories, visit the Cancer Topic Guide
New Scientist has received an unprecedented amount of interest in this story from readers. If you would like up-to-date information on any plans for clinical trials of DCA in patients with cancer, or would like to donate towards a fund for such trials, please visit the site set up by the University of Alberta and the Alberta Cancer Board. We will also follow events closely and will report any progress as it happens.
Update, 16 May 2011: If you've just heard about this story, please read this recent update too.
Article originally published online 17 January 2007:
It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that kills almost all cancers by switching off their "immortality". The drug, dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe.
It also has no patent, meaning it could be manufactured for a fraction of the cost of newly developed drugs.
Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleagues tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body and found that it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but not healthy cells. Tumours in rats deliberately infected with human cancer also shrank drastically when they were fed DCA-laced water for several weeks.
DCA attacks a unique feature of cancer cells: the fact that they make their energy throughout the main body of the cell, rather than in distinct organelles called mitochondria. This process, called glycolysis, is inefficient and uses up vast amounts of sugar.
Until now it had been assumed that cancer cells used glycolysis because their mitochondria were irreparably damaged. However, Michelakis's experiments prove this is not the case, because DCA reawakened the mitochondria in cancer cells. The cells then withered and died (Cancer Cell, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.020).
Michelakis suggests that the switch to glycolysis as an energy source occurs when cells in the middle of an abnormal but benign lump don't get enough oxygen for their mitochondria to work properly (see diagram). In order to survive, they switch off their mitochondria and start producing energy through glycolysis.
Crucially, though, mitochondria do another job in cells: they activate apoptosis, the process by which abnormal cells self-destruct. When cells switch mitochondria off, they become "immortal", outliving other cells in the tumour and so becoming dominant. Once reawakened by DCA, mitochondria reactivate apoptosis and order the abnormal cells to die.
"The results are intriguing because they point to a critical role that mitochondria play: they impart a unique trait to cancer cells that can be exploited for cancer therapy," says Dario Altieri, director of the University of Massachusetts Cancer Center in Worcester.
The phenomenon might also explain how secondary cancers form. Glycolysis generates lactic acid, which can break down the collagen matrix holding cells together. This means abnormal cells can be released and float to other parts of the body, where they seed new tumours.
DCA can cause pain, numbness and gait disturbances in some patients, but this may be a price worth paying if it turns out to be effective against all cancers. The next step is to run clinical trials of DCA in people with cancer. These may have to be funded by charities, universities and governments: pharmaceutical companies are unlikely to pay because they can't make money on unpatented medicines. The pay-off is that if DCA does work, it will be easy to manufacture and dirt cheap.
Paul Clarke, a cancer cell biologist at the University of Dundee in the UK, says the findings challenge the current assumption that mutations, not metabolism, spark off cancers. "The question is: which comes first?" he says.
 

TnWatchdog

Senior Member
Messages
7,099
Cancer took my mother out at 54 and my father at 72. I told my doctor, while doing my blood work, not to look too deep cause if he found anything, I wouldn't do anything about it anyway. The main reason is that I am "self insured" ha-ha. How many times do you hear...we cut him open and the cancer spread? Yeh you moved the bad-boy cells into a new location to multiply...my mother's death. Or we keep zapping these cells with radation and the patient weakens and dies...my father's death. A simple pill would be great but that would hurt the medical industry...they may not give in to this approach and try to block it. Money is at stake here, not your health. I know one thing...stay away from processed foods, but then we still have to contend with the air and water supplies that are toxic...IMO.
 

trekie4ever

Member
Messages
361
Doesn't surprise me. Maybe I'll request from my department head for my senior design to be a DCA production plant....
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Messages
5,440
it seems the drug companys are not one bit intrested in a cure for cancer I just heard of this and when I did a little research found it to be not only true but rather old news to it was first reported in early 2007
Cheap, 'safe' drug kills most cancers - health - 17 January 2007 - New Scientist

Cheap, 'safe' drug kills most cancers
  • Updated 13:31 17 May 2011 by Andy Coghlan
  • For similar stories, visit the Cancer Topic Guide
New Scientist has received an unprecedented amount of interest in this story from readers. If you would like up-to-date information on any plans for clinical trials of DCA in patients with cancer, or would like to donate towards a fund for such trials, please visit the site set up by the University of Alberta and the Alberta Cancer Board. We will also follow events closely and will report any progress as it happens.
Update, 16 May 2011: If you've just heard about this story, please read this recent update too.
Article originally published online 17 January 2007:
It sounds almost too good to be true: a cheap and simple drug that kills almost all cancers by switching off their "immortality". The drug, dichloroacetate (DCA), has already been used for years to treat rare metabolic disorders and so is known to be relatively safe.
It also has no patent, meaning it could be manufactured for a fraction of the cost of newly developed drugs.
Evangelos Michelakis of the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada, and his colleagues tested DCA on human cells cultured outside the body and found that it killed lung, breast and brain cancer cells, but not healthy cells. Tumours in rats deliberately infected with human cancer also shrank drastically when they were fed DCA-laced water for several weeks.
DCA attacks a unique feature of cancer cells: the fact that they make their energy throughout the main body of the cell, rather than in distinct organelles called mitochondria. This process, called glycolysis, is inefficient and uses up vast amounts of sugar.
Until now it had been assumed that cancer cells used glycolysis because their mitochondria were irreparably damaged. However, Michelakis's experiments prove this is not the case, because DCA reawakened the mitochondria in cancer cells. The cells then withered and died (Cancer Cell, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.020).
Michelakis suggests that the switch to glycolysis as an energy source occurs when cells in the middle of an abnormal but benign lump don't get enough oxygen for their mitochondria to work properly (see diagram). In order to survive, they switch off their mitochondria and start producing energy through glycolysis.
Crucially, though, mitochondria do another job in cells: they activate apoptosis, the process by which abnormal cells self-destruct. When cells switch mitochondria off, they become "immortal", outliving other cells in the tumour and so becoming dominant. Once reawakened by DCA, mitochondria reactivate apoptosis and order the abnormal cells to die.
"The results are intriguing because they point to a critical role that mitochondria play: they impart a unique trait to cancer cells that can be exploited for cancer therapy," says Dario Altieri, director of the University of Massachusetts Cancer Center in Worcester.
The phenomenon might also explain how secondary cancers form. Glycolysis generates lactic acid, which can break down the collagen matrix holding cells together. This means abnormal cells can be released and float to other parts of the body, where they seed new tumours.
DCA can cause pain, numbness and gait disturbances in some patients, but this may be a price worth paying if it turns out to be effective against all cancers. The next step is to run clinical trials of DCA in people with cancer. These may have to be funded by charities, universities and governments: pharmaceutical companies are unlikely to pay because they can't make money on unpatented medicines. The pay-off is that if DCA does work, it will be easy to manufacture and dirt cheap.
Paul Clarke, a cancer cell biologist at the University of Dundee in the UK, says the findings challenge the current assumption that mutations, not metabolism, spark off cancers. "The question is: which comes first?" he says.

I found a link to this substance online.

Home

But that doesn't seem inexpensive to me. 120 dollars for 100 grams seems like extortion.

Of course just making sure you eat your greens everyday, and stay away from processed foods, and you'll likely never develop cancer.
 

titorite

Senior Member
Messages
1,974
Einstein ..... How is it you profess to know so much but demonstrably show that you know so little?

At least in regards to cancer.

120 bucks for 100 grams? That is nothing compared to the thousands and sometimes tens of thousands people spend on chemo and radiation.

As for me? I use A rife Machine

PlasmaResearch


Mine is different than his... but does the same thing basically. Granted his is a plasma and mine is an audio but that there is advanced stuff. Truth is their is more than one way to cure cancer. I like Rife the best because a Rife machine can do more than just kill cancer.
 

Octavusprime

Member
Messages
461
$120 for 100g is very cheap. I work in the pharmacuetical field. 100g could make a hundred or more tablets depending on the drug.
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Messages
5,440
Einstein ..... How is it you profess to know so much but demonstrably show that you know so little?

At least in regards to cancer.

120 bucks for 100 grams? That is nothing compared to the thousands and sometimes tens of thousands people spend on chemo and radiation.

As for me? I use A rife Machine

PlasmaResearch


Mine is different than his... but does the same thing basically. Granted his is a plasma and mine is an audio but that there is advanced stuff. Truth is their is more than one way to cure cancer. I like Rife the best because a Rife machine can do more than just kill cancer.

I know all about the radionics machine technology that was developed and banned by the medical community. A technology that worked very well in its day. It's too bad that money and power is used to create the suffering in the first place. And then remove the medical license of any medical doctor that resorts to radionics technology to cure their patients.

But recently I came across something called the Alkaline diet that seems to reverse practically any ailment you can acquire. At present after being on this diet for 2 years now, I have lost all symptoms of arthritis, and just this last month I came across a food combination that allows me a full nights rest without the need to get up frequently anymore to urinate. One of the main claims for the Alkaline diet is that it can reverse and cure many forms of cancer. It was discovered that people with cancer have a very acidic blood PH. You can raise that PH to normal levels by eating unprocessed food. There are specific foods that can get faster results too.

So I don't doubt that their are many ways to restore health. But extortion by Obama and the medical community is not going to be one of my choices.
 

trekie4ever

Member
Messages
361
*1 for alkaline diet. Also great for weight loss as you'll cut out a lot of junk.
Problem is finding quality unprocessed food.
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Messages
5,440
*1 for alkaline diet. Also great for weight loss as you'll cut out a lot of junk.
Problem is finding quality unprocessed food.

That's the easy part. Did you know there is a section in your local grocery store called the produce department? I used to skip that part of the store altogether until about 2 years ago. Almost all of the food in that section of the store is not processed. If you're really picky, you can choose organically locally grown food too. Guaranteed to be produced without chemicals or pesticides. A rule of thumb that I use is, if it comes in a wrapper or a box, don't eat it. Because it's processed. They stripped out the vital nutrition your body needs to safely digest it. You might be surprised to find out how many different types of food there are in the produce department.
 

Top