Does President Trump have a Time Machine?

[Treversal]

President Trump repeatedly makes statements about the future that turn out to be true. For example, there was an explosion in Europe and he immediately posted on Twitter that it was a terrorist attack. he was attacked for posting that without any information at all. But he was right, it was a terrorist attack. And this week he posted about another agreement with Mexico but Mexico said they knew nothing of another agreement. Was he stating what WILL happen in the future? The hints are everywhere. He makes statements about China for example, saying they would do better to make a deal on trade with him now before he gets re-elected or it will be much worse for them. What do you think?

POLLS FROM THE FUTURE???


"Well, you're reading the wrong polls. You're reading the wrong polls," Trump responded to questions from reporters about new numbers from CNN, Fox News and The Washington Post/ABC among others. "You're read- -- let me just tell you, I have the real polls. I have the real polls. The CNN polls are fake. The Fox polls have always been lousy. I tell them they ought to get themselves a new pollster."

 

[Cirrus]

POLLS FROM THE FUTURE???


"Well, you're reading the wrong polls. You're reading the wrong polls," Trump responded to questions from reporters about new numbers from CNN, Fox News and The Washington Post/ABC among others. "You're read- -- let me just tell you, I have the real polls. I have the real polls. The CNN polls are fake. The Fox polls have always been lousy. I tell them they ought to get themselves a new pollster."

But Trump's pollster is just some guy who writes "Trump is the bestest" in the highest column.

 

[dimension-1hacker]

@Trekkie - OK, but the way he is portrayed in the media is often twisted and/or taken out of context.

doesn't believe climate change is occuring. 99% of scientists think based off data avaliable that climate change is occuring. to much c02 and all exposed plants and trees would die.

 

[dimension-1hacker]

We're not meaning to argue, either, but our point is that you can't trust that CNN is telling you the truth. The best thing is to ask us citiziens and honestly, cross my heart, our economy is soaring. My business is doing great. I bought my dream home. Compare that to what CNN says and it doesn't match, right? Opinions are one thing. We just want people to get the facts right.

Many of us have vested interest in the UK. My DNA is 74% British. My ancestry is over there. I want Britain to succeed. I hate how the culture there is being destroyed by one group of people all because of political correctness. My family's culture and history is disappearing. It is very disappointing. I personally won't get too involved in British politics unless it affects us, but just as you have an opinion about Trump, we have opinions about your leaders, too.

I think logically no webpage could be trusted, how can i know weather the infomation is acurate. also, what are the odds my senses portray the external world accurately. I dont understand why my senses portray anythinhg at all therefor there is no way to rule out any cause. Therefor every cause is as likely to be true as any other because no cause is more correct then any other.
why argue about a reality that probally doesn't exist externally anyway. If you do then trust science, not trump.

 

[Classicalfan626]

doesn't believe climate change is occuring. 99% of scientists think based off data avaliable that climate change is occuring. to much c02 and all exposed plants and trees would die.

Not true. Just more leftist propaganda.

@Einstein - Would you please explain the man-made climate change hoax to this member, if you don't mind?

 

[dimension-1hacker]

Not true. Just more leftist propaganda.

@Einstein - Would you please explain the man-made climate change hoax to this member, if you don't mind?

I think logically no webpage could be trusted, how can i know weather the infomation is acurate. also, what are the odds my senses portray the external world accurately. I dont understand why my senses portray anything at all therefor there is no way to rule out any cause. Therefor every cause is as likely to be true as any other because no cause is more correct then any other. If the cause could be anything and only one image of the external word is correct and an infinite amount of causes means an infinite amount of ways the images percieved are incorrect based off the pictures could be created in any way possible.
why argue about a reality that probally doesn't exist externally anyway. If you do then probally trust science, not trump and rightist propoganda perpetuated by oil companies.

 

[Einstein]

doesn't believe climate change is occuring. 99% of scientists think based off data avaliable that climate change is occuring. to much c02 and all exposed plants and trees would die.

Al Gore invented global warming. Since 1998 the data charts show global warming stopped. Which makes the whole idea that CO2 was causing the global warming a complete hoax. CO2 is a vital necessary component of the life cycle for all living things on our planet. Remove just the CO2 and all living things would perish. There is very little CO2 in our atmosphere. Only around 400 parts per million. CO2 does not store heat. There is no science that even explains how CO2 could even contribute to warming the atmosphere. Our atmosphere behaves as a conductor, conducting all radiation through itself with little interaction. Just stand on a sandy beach on a hot summer day. The sand is too hot to stand on. But the air doesn't burn. Just a little common sense fact.

The climate change scare is political propaganda. Our climate has been changing every year through cycles called the four seasons. Spring, summer, fall, and winter. No season ever winds up being the same as the year before. I'm surprised you didn't know this. If any scientist believes that CO2 is causing climate change, then he isn't a very good scientist. Scientists are supposedly supposed to be educated with factual data. But political scientists seems to favor a fat paycheck over science. And of course the statement that 99% of scientists back up climate change is just pure bullshit.

 

[dimension-1hacker]

Al Gore invented global warming. Since 1998 the data charts show global warming stopped. Which makes the whole idea that CO2 was causing the global warming a complete hoax. CO2 is a vital necessary component of the life cycle for all living things on our planet. Remove just the CO2 and all living things would perish. There is very little CO2 in our atmosphere. Only around 400 parts per million. CO2 does not store heat. There is no science that even explains how CO2 could even contribute to warming the atmosphere. Our atmosphere behaves as a conductor, conducting all radiation through itself with little interaction. Just stand on a sandy beach on a hot summer day. The sand is too hot to stand on. But the air doesn't burn. Just a little common sense fact.

The climate change scare is political propaganda. Our climate has been changing every year through cycles called the four seasons. Spring, summer, fall, and winter. No season ever winds up being the same as the year before. I'm surprised you didn't know this. If any scientist believes that CO2 is causing climate change, then he isn't a very good scientist. Scientists are supposedly supposed to be educated with factual data. But political scientists seems to favor a fat paycheck over science. And of course the statement that 99% of scientists back up climate change is just pure bullshit.

what sources?

 

[Einstein]

You used to be able to go to the Nasa website to find the temperature charts. They just gather satellite data without taking sides. I've heard that people are no longer able to find the data charts any longer. It's like we under an enemy nation occupation. All history is being erased and replaced with fiction. Try looking up Faraday's left-hand rule. It is the basis for the industrial revolution. Without it we would still be in the stone ages. You wont be able to construct an AC motor without this knowledge. Troubleshooting an electrical problem would be impossible. There are many things I've noticed that are being taught differently than I learned them. Most of what you know is just garbage knowledge anyway. So what difference does it make if the narrative changes? For instance, I took chemistry and mechanics in high school. CO2 is actually used in air conditioners. It is a gas that transfers heat very easily by going through compression and evaporation cycles. Thus CO2 is a conductor of heat. But then all atmospheric gasses are conductors of heat. They do so very rapidly too. Not like sand with seems to hold onto heat much longer.

 

[Classicalfan626]

@Einstein - By all means I agree with you and what you're saying, but for verification's sake, please do some research and provide at least one source to back your claims.