Einstein
Temporal Engineer
Dont think for one moment that i would ever challenge your excellent engineering skills mate, but from what i remember are the Caduceus coils are wound onto a former such as a round length of soft iron which would be perfectly straight...The theory being that when the two single lengths of wire that form the X shaping of the coil, a collapsed magnetic field is created within the centre of the X, and when a current is fed into one end of the coil, the opposite end acts an antenna for the scalar waves...It's funny when reading on HDRkid website no one (so far) corrected the mistake that(rubbing plate has a caduceus coil) ..which is incorrect.. since its flat it can only have a bifillar coil or any pancake shaped..its even obvious from fotos posted by some users..I guess some people just write anything ..no wonder so many people keep building non functional machines![]()
It's not a mistake. The HDR does have a caduceus coil attached underneath the rubbing plate area. It started out as a bifilar coil in the older HDR's. But the improved design adds a twist to the bifilar coil windings, turning it into a caduceus coil in pancake form.
Another way to create the scalar waves is by sticking two 6 inch long bar magnets together with both north poles facing each other and wrapping two pieces of wire around the magnets, into which an electrical current is fed into a small 6 to 9 volt motor...The theory is that the resulting scalar waves will radiate from the tiny gaps between the two magnets, which are the areas of the collapsed magnetic field..
The X shaping is the commonality between traditional caduceus coils and the Gibbs design. Basically two magnetic fields are created at right angles to each other. Those crossed magnetic fields will then no longer be at right angles to the electrical fields in the wires. They will also be parallel due to the X shaping of the coils. But what is missing out of the textbooks on caduceus coils is the third mechanical force field that is always present when the other two fields are varying in intensity.
I have not come across any textbook information relating scalar waves to electromagnetic knowledge. So I do tend to look at the term scalar wave as a brainwashing technique to prevent us from understanding what is actually going on. Have you ever noticed that the term scalar waves is only used when the information being presented is to describe something outside the boundaries of our understanding? Wouldn't it be easier to just use the third mechanical force instead in the description? Maybe that third force has a relation to gravity. And it's just a simple experiment away to show us how easy it is to understand. I did do a very puzzling experiment a long time ago that has had me wondering ever since.