HDRKid II

Re: HDRKid II

Here's a little tip:

This is a forum. On a forum, people have conversations. In a conversation, people ask and answer questions.

What are you doing here if you're not even going to participate in your own thread? We're asking you the same shit over and over and over...

For the last time:

1- Link to your past predictions you state as current fact.
2- Are the sites Starlord linked to yours?
3- Why are you such a tool?
 
Re: HDRKid II

Is calling the HDR a fraud over and over a productive contribution to this thread, more productive than HDRKID's own posts ?

Not that I want to specificaly defend the kid, but I can't tell him flat out that he has to answer every single questions if there are some he doesn't want to answer. I mean, he's free to post what he wants, as long as it doesn't break the forum rules. This guy doesn't break the forum rules.

To all: Try to be patient and don't take it too seriously or too personal. Some might not enjoy the way HDRKID posts. Does that prevent you from being nice with him ?

To HDRKID: Please, try to answer some questions at least! Oh, and check your inbox, I sent you a message.
 
Re: HDRKid II

To Brentnauer:

You are questions and I have answers. :)

1- Link to your past predictions you state as current fact.
This is a good idea. For example I am now predicting that this year gas goes over $3/gallon before the end of the year. I believe I saw it in the summer.

2- Are the sites Starlord linked to yours?
I do not believe Starlord links his sites to mine. Sites with the word "HDRKID" are mine. Steven Gibbs has sites. Patricia Ress has sites. Steven Gibbs sites sell his equipment. Patricia Ress sites sell her books.

3- Why are you such a tool?
Please restate the question.

Why do you maintain a ##### Blogger site and phpBB forum?
That is your opinion. There are currently over 32,000 members in the HDRKID Time Travel Forum.

Shouldn't you be living in a mansion filled with stock market and lottery cash on top of a mountain?
I have tried repeatly to win. The important thing to remember is that you go to an alternate timeline similar to our own. For example, one time I saw a timeline that looked the same. I ran out to the grocery. Got three numbers of the six. What can I say? Close, but no cigar.


To Starlord:

Is This Your Site?
HDRKID sites are mine.

By reading many of the posts at each spot, a few points become glaringly apparent which raise an even more fundamentally important issue. Can you guess what those may be?
OK sorry, you are losing me on this one.


To Hartke:

Maybe they're poor spellers?
My spelling is less than optimal as they say.
 
Re: HDRKid II

""To Starlord:
Rather than brag about how great my predictions are, here is a look at three predictions that did not occur.

Back in 1999 I predicted that by then end of 2009 the world would be quite different. Here are three new technologies I said would take over.

1) I said that bluray would replace DVD, and that most people would in HD watch their movies. They would use giant LCD screens.
In fact, most people still have a DVD viewer. If 50% or more had bluray my prediction would have come. People blame the recession.

2) To compete local cinemas would convert from analog to digital. I predicted that most movies would instead of using bulky film would convert to digital transmission over an internet and be shown on giant screens.
Fact is that most movies are still in film in most cinemas. Digital projectors are still too expensive.

3) SSD replaces HD. This one makes me sad and then some. It will take place, but most people still use the slow bulky hard drive when solid state drives are much faster, less noisy, smaller, and use less energy.
Sadly, on our timeline SSD did not take off and is still too expensive. It will be years before it is common.

This is the weakness of remote viewing. I can only tell you what happens on alternate timelines that are similar to our own. There is always a percentage of error. I will say that on most timelines HD won, but we are a bit slow on this one.""

Brag?

In order to pull off something even close to that, you would have had to have been right at least one time.

Seeings how everything you post is nothing more than a expose in Passive Aggressive behavior and how not to lie to people, and being unable to hide the fact that everything you lamely offer as IF it came from one of your lower astral plane jaunts, you have never once gotten any thing correct that did not already exist before you posted it. There is a MASSIVE hole in your stories that neither you, Gibbs or his profit sharing acolytes ever bothered to consider: you are missing something so integral to the Astral that to not mention it shows beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are nowhere near where you think and wish others to believe you have traveled to. Also, Your allusion to a divergence, due to "alternate time-lines" and then borrowing the titor supposed golden 3% (which was an out that the authors gave them selves) as the icing, is nothing but insulting.

To put it more bluntly, you unknowingly hold up your hand that is covered with equal amounts of peanut butter and jelly and proclaim that you have access to a PBJ sandwich when it's more than obvious that the bread has always been missing.

The hdrkid debacle is a picture perfect example on how NOT to pull a Hoax off and consequently by definition, suffers from the greatest case of obtuse known to people that observe hoaxes. Your claim to win Formula 1 races is defined by the plastic wheels on your 1/16 scale soapbox derby prototype falling off of which G.I. Joe's plastic boot could not fit into, let alone not even having a .005 CC model gas glow-plug-engine to power it.

How many ways does it have to be pointed out to you that unless you supply a link to the appropriate guess, everything you post is automatically suspect?

You might be able to wow the kids in your own forums, unfortunately for you, folks here deal with reality.



You do know what Passive Aggressive behavior is, right?
 
Re: HDRKid II

Numenorean7 said:
Is calling the HDR a fraud over and over a productive contribution to this thread, more productive than HDRKID's own posts ?
As this is your forum Numenorean, no one wants to raise your wrath however, as you can see from the thousands of posts where typically questions, points and logic has been ignored and we have seen the term "prediction" used, when most know it referred to repeating known information, a thousand times and stating that point; this boils down to the going at it with tong and hammer trying to slag out some sort of usable and working dialog and semantics that all can agree on.


Does that prevent you from being nice with him ?
How would you treat a person that treated you in the same fashion for several years?

Though I'd like to call a spade a spade, I'm keeping things in a clinical frame work, just dealing with usable, accepted, known reference points.

To HDRKID: Please, try to answer some questions at least!
Click to expand...

Thank You.
 
Re: HDRKid II

I just don't understand what is so difficult about linking to predictions you made in the past. The AHA I TOLD YOU posts don't mean a damn thing if you're just saying "well in 1999 I predicted Asian amnesiacs would take over the USSR and it happened!"... WHERE did you say these things? Show us. Please. You only have 380+ posts here dude, find them.

You show up and make these outrageous claims, yet do nothing to show us how you're right. Your posts are full of evasive non-answers, nonsensical exposition about things that have nothing to do with the path the thread is currently on... It took me sending a private message to Num7 to even get you to acknowledge the fact that other people post in here besides you.

Oh, and do you know WHY your forum has 32,000+ members? They're called spam bots. I wouldn't toot that horn too loudly.
 
Re: HDRKid II

I hear you Starlord. It'd be great if HDRKID could work his way through "real" arguments, proofs, explanations and precise details in an analytical and structured way, pretty much like you guys would if you were experiencing and testing a similar device in order to understand it better, and share. I think it'd be a great show. Though, I can't force him to do that.

Ok, I know, it's pretty obvious that the HDRKID saga is no longer what it used to. I mean, we talked about it in long and large, and it seems like after all these years, it just cannot be anything else than a fraud. I can't argue on that point, despites all I'd want to believe.

However, I still have hopes that one day, someone will stumble upon this thread and talk about the HDR, about the real deal. A person who tried it, made tests, and let us know about actual results, not just predictions and "I told you so" replies.

If I tested the HDR myself and posted about my experiences with it, would you even believe me, and consider my data ?
I'm not asking if you trust me. I'm asking if you'd be open to seriously listen to and discuss with someone who could actually present you and test the HDR in a scientific, analytical and precisely detailed way. Perhaps HDRKID knows someone who'd be interested to give it a try.

Until that day, we've gotta chat with HDRKID. He's been here for a pretty long time, and you guys know him pretty well. If he doesn't answer your questions directly, or at all, I'm sure he doesn't do that in order to insult you guys. If I were him, hoaxer or real time traveler, I'd probably get frustrated at some point.

If someone ever gets too frustrated, or can't stand an other member anymore, there are "add to ignore list" buttons in every member's profile page. These buttons exist for that sole purpose.
 
Re: HDRKid II

I propose that this be this weeks chat session. Let's all get in the same room with the kid and put his validity to the test. But to be honest here folks.....who in their right mind would WANT to experiment with the HDR? But it would make for a great debate nonetheless.
 
Re: HDRKid II

Numenorean7 said:
If someone ever gets too frustrated, or can't stand an other member anymore, there are "add to ignore list" buttons in every member's profile page. These buttons exist for that sole purpose.
Click to expand...
This is precisely what I've done.

I'm over reading posts from someone pretending to be something they aren't.

Of course, this could be true for every post I read, but in the case of HDRKid, it became obvious several years ago that there was no "there" there.

Harte
 

Top