Harte
Senior Member
Re: HDRKID
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"hdrkid\")</div>
This is typical of just about any quackery that has ever existed. Pretend to come up with some new miraculous device and then build-in an excuse for why it won't work. I am surprised that Gibbs himself doesn't have to find this "vortex" for you, or hasn't constructed a "vortex locator". Ever heard of The Amazing Randi?
There is no such thing as a "vortex".
Also, you forgot to mention how the HDR won't work in the presence of a skeptical observer.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"hdrkid\")</div>
I would take issue with your statement about inventors versus scientists. No inventor has ever discovered a new scientific principle. And by the way, I notice you changing the facts to better fit your thesis. Pasteur was a scientist, not an inventor. He begged doctors "to please wash their hands," not scientists. And at the time, surgery was still being conducted by barbers in some areas.
Regarding your propensity for (putting it mildly) re-arranging facts to bolster your arguments, be assured that I will brook no such nonsense in any discussion you have with me, regardless of the attitude these other, naive waifs may take toward your method of butchering the truth.
Harte
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"hdrkid\")</div>
For physical time travel Steven Gibbs says that you must be over a vortex and the vortex must be open. Typically a vortex will have paranormal phenomena around it like ghosts and UFOs.
Think of a vortex as an interdimensional doorway.[/b]
This is typical of just about any quackery that has ever existed. Pretend to come up with some new miraculous device and then build-in an excuse for why it won't work. I am surprised that Gibbs himself doesn't have to find this "vortex" for you, or hasn't constructed a "vortex locator". Ever heard of The Amazing Randi?
There is no such thing as a "vortex".
Also, you forgot to mention how the HDR won't work in the presence of a skeptical observer.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"hdrkid\")</div>
Dear Hartke:
I do not expect you to believe. In fact, I find it hard to understand how scalar interferometry works, but remember this. At one time it was thought impossible to split the atom due to the law of conservation of matter.
Most advances come not from scientists, but from inventors. Many of these inventors like the man who invented the rollerblade spend years being made fun of until they finally succeed. The few scientists that make inventions are often laughed at.
Pasteur spent years begging scientists to please wash their hands and to sterilize medical instruments. They did not have time to listen to such \"poppycock\" about invisible germs causing disease. [/b]
I would take issue with your statement about inventors versus scientists. No inventor has ever discovered a new scientific principle. And by the way, I notice you changing the facts to better fit your thesis. Pasteur was a scientist, not an inventor. He begged doctors "to please wash their hands," not scientists. And at the time, surgery was still being conducted by barbers in some areas.
Regarding your propensity for (putting it mildly) re-arranging facts to bolster your arguments, be assured that I will brook no such nonsense in any discussion you have with me, regardless of the attitude these other, naive waifs may take toward your method of butchering the truth.
Harte