But I’m going to make the effort to stay on track from now on and impart what I believe will be valuables information that hopeful will effect changes, to steer this world-line I hope to a better place.
Good, please ignore all angry people, they only waste your time and energy.
To make sense of the these change’s, I’ve been running various computer models through whats best could be describe as a supercomputer (quantum mechanical computer) to predict and make sense of how the divergence will cause things to play out in this world-line. However I haven’t fully made my mind up if reveal my findings is the correct course of action. There is ethical, moral and other ramifications to take in to consideration. Most people prefer to live in complete ignorance of the impending doom that’s about to before them. So is it the right thing to do?
Well, you don't have to worry about starting a panic, because when Titor said that there was a nuclear war in his timeline on March 12th, 2015, there was no panic. There also wasn't any panic on December 21, 2012, when this age ended according to the Mayan calendar.
As far as most people wanting to live in ignorance, I think that's a mistaken impression due to the fact that there usually isn't much people can do because peaceful protests are ignored by the media, and violent protests make a cause look bad. However, on the few occasions where people can do something, the majority are acting. For example, in the current US presidential nomination run, people's vote in the primaries do matter, and the anti-establishment candidates are reported to be getting around 45% of the vote. Candidate Vote Share analysis:
Jimstone.is - World Class Investigative Truth
shows that the anti-establishment candidates have been robbed of about 10% of the vote, therefore the anti-establishment candidates are actually getting around 55% of the vote. So even though people seem to be passively accepting their oppression, whenever people have a chance to act, the majority are doing what they can.
The main problem is that there are futures worse than the Titor timeline. For example someone had a vision of 2026 where only 6 million people in North America survived a nuclear war:
Postnuke Future
There is an alternate 2043 where the oligarchical world government won, according to a time traveller from there:
Hello 2013 (Time Traveler from 2043)
If your prediction supercomputer can show you that warning people won't increase the total probability of futures worse than Titor's timeline, then I think you should warn us. It is a tricky prediction to make because not only would you be warning people about the future, you would also be implicitly showing them that time travel is possible (in proportion to the credibility of the warning). If your supercomputer can not show you the full effect of a warning from a time traveller, then I don't know.