3sp
Junior Member
- Messages
- 106
All laughs aside i feel Natural Philosopher has some real validity. He does know what he's talking about.
All laughs aside i feel Natural Philosopher has some real validity. He does know what he's talking about.
That is probably easy enough on here. Still i enjoy conversing with him and i am a bit of a dreamer. I want to believe time travel is possible and i am not alone in that. I read a lot of different ways it could be possible and astral projection and the hdr enhancing it being ways to view. Physical travel i don't feel could be possible. Changing things not possible when looked at logically. Those claiming to not having evidence to support claims. Whats your take Einstein?Nope. He just preys on the gullible.
All laughs aside i feel Natural Philosopher has some real validity. He does know what he's talking about.
That is probably easy enough on here. Still i enjoy conversing with him and i am a bit of a dreamer. I want to believe time travel is possible and i am not alone in that. I read a lot of different ways it could be possible and astral projection and the hdr enhancing it being ways to view. Physical travel i don't feel could be possible. Changing things not possible when looked at logically. Those claiming to not having evidence to support claims. Whats your take Einstein?
I don't prey on anyone.Nope. He just preys on the gullible.
nice of ya to say : )All laughs aside i feel Natural Philosopher has some real validity. He does know what he's talking about.
I do happen to believe physical time travel is possible. Why else would the schools go to such great lengths to educate us with fiction?
I am still not convinced the past is real. Travel to the future is possible due to relativity (not really time travel, but dilation). Travel to the past is not possible unless the past exists. A good argument for the past not existing is the absence of obvious time travel.