- Dec 15, 2005
Pretty cool video:
No such studies exist.Stellar engines may also have existed in the past.
Serious studies have shown compelling evidences that the Moon is not a natural satellite.
In fact, the Earth is slightly older than the Moon.The Moon is much older than the Earth.
No, it doesn't. Where did you get that idea?It possess an exoskeleton structure.
The moon is not hollow.And it is hollow suggesting that it may be inhabitted.
There's no reason to think that.The Moon must have been fabricated elsewhere and put in its current place by Stellar machines.
Anyone can believe whatever they want.You're like most conspiracy theorists on here, you believe in a theory that isn't backed by any actual science such as the hollow moon theory. Yes there's weird shit and aliens out there but the bloody moon isn't hollow.
You've just described every religion that ever came into existence. Belief followed by lies. It's an age-old formula for gaining followers.Anyone can believe whatever they want.
But when they start posting lies about it to make it seem correct ("Serious studies have shown compelling evidences that the Moon is not a natural satellite." etc.,) thinking individuals have a moral obligation to step in and correct the record.