- Messages
- 12,375
They're all posted as schematics in this section of the forum.Where can I find this file?No idea. I don't know anything about this device, other than what's in the first post, which I didn't write. It's from an archive file.
They're all posted as schematics in this section of the forum.Where can I find this file?No idea. I don't know anything about this device, other than what's in the first post, which I didn't write. It's from an archive file.
Time travel in this manner is not possible except to the future with no possible way to return to the present time. You can physically travel back in time but you'd be in a different parallel universe to your original one. This machine could work in an astro-projection type of manner, but in that case you're not physically time travelling, but rather gathering information, and when you observe a quantum function, you collapse the wave function to a single point, so simply put, when you travel through time, you are never staying in your point of origin to be able to affect your own timeline, otherwise there would be a multitude of paradoxes that would prevent time travel from being possible at all.
What is your opinion on Al Bielek?Time travel in this manner is not possible except to the future with no possible way to return to the present time. You can physically travel back in time but you'd be in a different parallel universe to your original one. This machine could work in an astro-projection type of manner, but in that case you're not physically time travelling, but rather gathering information, and when you observe a quantum function, you collapse the wave function to a single point, so simply put, when you travel through time, you are never staying in your point of origin to be able to affect your own timeline, otherwise there would be a multitude of paradoxes that would prevent time travel from being possible at all.
Do you think the multiverse is infinite? And if so, what do you think of the possibility of fictional worlds and settings being real in it?@StarTraveller94
I believe all information has a basis of truth to it. If you were to explain quantum mechanics to a lower life form, you couldn't explain it in a direct way, but rather an indirect way. If that entity took that information as literal, they would be mistaken and eventually call you out as a liar, or charlatan. That's the funny thing about information, you need pre-requisite knowledge to understand certain things, and to impart that wisdom upon a lower intellect entity is a challenge in itself. Regarding the story of Al Bielek, there would be some truth to it. Is it to be taken as literal truth according to our current timeline? I would say not. There are too many missing pieces right now with time travel either physically or through projection, to definitively call out this person or that person as being liars. The most interesting thing about Al Bielek I'd like to know, is how time was locked during his travels so he remained in the same worldline. In either case, I believe it takes an open mind to accept this information as being partially true, and there always needs to be skepticism in order to advance our understanding. One thing I do know is that once we observe something, we make it happen, which is why it's so hard to postulate time travel, because we're dealing with an unknown of multiple possibilities, but once we travel there, or look at it, we make it snap into a single possibility, which supports the theory of everything happening simultaneously across the multiverse.
Do you think the multiverse is infinite? And if so, what do you think of the possibility of fictional worlds and settings being real in it?@StarTraveller94
I believe all information has a basis of truth to it. If you were to explain quantum mechanics to a lower life form, you couldn't explain it in a direct way, but rather an indirect way. If that entity took that information as literal, they would be mistaken and eventually call you out as a liar, or charlatan. That's the funny thing about information, you need pre-requisite knowledge to understand certain things, and to impart that wisdom upon a lower intellect entity is a challenge in itself. Regarding the story of Al Bielek, there would be some truth to it. Is it to be taken as literal truth according to our current timeline? I would say not. There are too many missing pieces right now with time travel either physically or through projection, to definitively call out this person or that person as being liars. The most interesting thing about Al Bielek I'd like to know, is how time was locked during his travels so he remained in the same worldline. In either case, I believe it takes an open mind to accept this information as being partially true, and there always needs to be skepticism in order to advance our understanding. One thing I do know is that once we observe something, we make it happen, which is why it's so hard to postulate time travel, because we're dealing with an unknown of multiple possibilities, but once we travel there, or look at it, we make it snap into a single possibility, which supports the theory of everything happening simultaneously across the multiverse.