I'm from 2146, ask me anything

[TimeFlipper]

Firstly i would like to say that before anybody shouts out bullshit, they must first offer a valid counter argument ..
You say you have read about the PX and the Montauk project, but i feel that you dont have any knowledge in the area of electronics to support a valid counter argument, and therefore you are not in a position to simply scream out bullshit ..

@Apri1 Lets look at the Montauk Project book, you say you have read...Preston Nichols gives precise info on how the various parts of certain radio receivers are utilised in the Project, Chapter 10, Pages 65 to 66..He goes on to discuss the Montauk Chair, the Cray 1 computer, the IBM360, the functions of the Cray 1 plus the IBM360, then onto Helmholtz coils...Delta Time Coils were mentioned, and there is a schematic diagram of the SP600 receiver plus its Carrier Processor...

There are many many more electronic explanations in the book of which iam certain you know nothing about, and yet you shout out, its all bullshit ....There are several of the "Preston Nichols debunkers whom i have emailed and asked them to explain why the electronics Preston Nichols have provided are wrong, and why??...Guess what?, i have NEVER received a reply from any of them, simply because they cannot debunk his electronic expertise, because they knew nothing about electronics..

If you want maths to look at, watch Preston Nichols You Tube posting, The Philadelphia Experiment and the Delta Time-Generator..

Time Dimension::My term for a dimension that`s in a different time-frame to ours..

A Hertzian wave is the normal type of Radio Wave that we hear on our radio`s and watch the TV with...
The non Hertzian Wave is generally called a Scalar Wave..

Have i re-created the Philadelphia Experiment?, no but i understand the possibility of how it works..

You have the automatic right to your own opinions, thats never in doubt...But when you start shouting out bullshit, you will be asked to explain why and how its bullshit, just like ive done ..

 

[Apri1]

Firstly i would like to say that before anybody shouts out bullshit, they must first offer a valid counter argument ..
You say you have read about the PX and the Montauk project, but i feel that you dont have any knowledge in the area of electronics to support a valid counter argument, and therefore you are not in a position to simply scream out bullshit ..

@Apri1 Lets look at the Montauk Project book, you say you have read...Preston Nichols gives precise info on how the various parts of certain radio receivers are utilised in the Project, Chapter 10, Pages 65 to 66..He goes on to discuss the Montauk Chair, the Cray 1 computer, the IBM360, the functions of the Cray 1 plus the IBM360, then onto Helmholtz coils...Delta Time Coils were mentioned, and there is a schematic diagram of the SP600 receiver plus its Carrier Processor...

There are many many more electronic explanations in the book of which iam certain you know nothing about, and yet you shout out, its all bullshit ....There are several of the "Preston Nichols debunkers whom i have emailed and asked them to explain why the electronics Preston Nichols have provided are wrong, and why??...Guess what?, i have NEVER received a reply from any of them, simply because they cannot debunk his electronic expertise, because they knew nothing about electronics..

If you want maths to look at, watch Preston Nichols You Tube posting, The Philadelphia Experiment and the Delta Time-Generator..

Time Dimension::My term for a dimension that`s in a different time-frame to ours..

A Hertzian wave is the normal type of Radio Wave that we hear on our radio`s and watch the TV with...
The non Hertzian Wave is generally called a Scalar Wave..

Have i re-created the Philadelphia Experiment?, no but i understand the possibility of how it works..

You have the automatic right to your own opinions, thats never in doubt...But when you start shouting out bullshit, you will be asked to explain why and how its bullshit, just like ive done ..

So what you're saying is that you can't get the electronics to work as claimed, despite your expertise? Ngl you're really proving my point here. Does the book list sources for its information? Has it been confirmed and checked? Has any of the actual scientific bits been in peer reviewed journals with statistically significant results? Are there any other resources to learn about these phenomenon?

I'm guessing the answer to all of those is no.

 

[Cirrus]

Has any of the actual scientific bits been in peer reviewed journals with statistically significant results? Are there any other resources to learn about these phenomenon?

Yes, but the people who ran the projects are dead.

 

[TimeFlipper]

So what you're saying is that you can't get the electronics to work as claimed, despite your expertise? Ngl you're really proving my point here. Does the book list sources for its information? Has it been confirmed and checked? Has any of the actual scientific bits been in peer reviewed journals with statistically significant results? Are there any other resources to learn about these phenomenon?

I'm guessing the answer to all of those is no.

Dont try putting words into my mouth April, i said i understood the possibility of the PX....Frankly you are making a fool of yourself by saying the Montauk Project is all bullshit, when you clearly know absolutely nothing about electronics..
Its up to you to get confirmation and search for "peer" reviews not me, but i guarantee you will not find anyone to contradict Preston Nichols and his electronic expertise, and i doubt very much that anyone would have even attempted to duplicate his work, except for Governments..

If you had read the Montauk Project as you claimed, you will find a glossary at the rear of the Book, Preston Nichols does not need any sources of information, he IS the informant and its his own work, which if you had actually read the book, you would know about..


Dont forget to check out that video clip i told you about...You wanted to see if Preston Nichols knows his maths, so find out on You Tube...."Preston Nichols The Philadelphia Experiment and the Delta Time Generator"....enjoy ..

 

[Einstein]

What do you want to know? Honestly I'm a bit tired of going over my entire life over and over with people. If there's something specific you're curious about, I'm happy to share. Amusingly, I had posted a thread a bit earlier about a breakthrough I had. No one cared to respond haha.



There's a lot of fantastic tales like these. Honestly I'm just a hardened skeptic. I feel like I differ a lot from the regular crowd here in that I pretty much believe in literally none of this bullshit. I've yet to see anyone seriously approach the topic of time travel. Most "supernatural" type photos/videos are all clear hoaxes or just reading too much into static. So many people have baseless beliefs and just randomly expect people to believe the shit they spew out without much reasoning or evidence of any kind.

I've read up on stuff like the Philadelphia Experiment and the Montauk stuff. I've seen various "whistle blowers" like Andrew Basiago. Excuse my lack of enthusiasm but it all appears to be bullshit.

Actual facts and conspiracies usually have trails to explore and discover. A good example of this is the 9/11 and JFK cover ups. All sorts of loose ends, obvious fallacies in official narratives, and when you dig you can find more. Try doing research into the Philadelphia Experiment. You'll find absolutely nothing. If anything you just find random made up fiction written by some anon. A waste of time, really.

But if anyone has actual connections to the people in these events, I'm happy to hear from the people involved first hand. Any 11actual government documents talking about it. Things like that. But nothing like that ever shows up. So I remain unconvinced.

I came across the Philadelphia Experiment by word of mouth. Someone once told me that they knew of some navy wives that had witnessed the Eldridge disappear right out of the water. Professor Opmmur also has a similar story of how he came to learn of the experiment too. This was way before there was any literature available to read about the Philadelphia Experiment. I came across a Dr. James Corum that was the most credible source so far to date for verifying any of the claims made. He succeeded in constructing a device which demonstrated radar invisibility. I would suggest investigating his research if you want some real meat and potatoes.

 

[TimeFlipper]

I recall reading a book by Charles Berlitz in the 1960s (can`t remember the title of it), and on one page there was a very short sentence about the Philadelphia Experiment...I think that might have the time when Berlitz was joining up with the researcher Ian Moore, and as you know a decade later they came up with their own book, The Philadelphia Experiment ..

Do you remember the date differential between the PX book and the subsequent Montauk Books? ..
By the way, do you still have your Zero Time Generator? ..

 

[Einstein]

I recall reading a book by Charles Berlitz in the 1960s (can`t remember the title of it), and on one page there was a very short sentence about the Philadelphia Experiment...I think that might have the time when Berlitz was joining up with the researcher Ian Moore, and as you know a decade later they came up with their own book, The Philadelphia Experiment ..

Do you remember the date differential between the PX book and the subsequent Montauk Books? ..
By the way, do you still have your Zero Time Generator? ..

No, I don't know. I just wanted Apri1 to know that people were talking about the Philadelphia Experiment long before any books or movies were made. And yes I still have the Zero Time Generator.

 

[TimeFlipper]

No, I don't know. I just wanted Apri1 to know that people were talking about the Philadelphia Experiment long before any books or movies were made. And yes I still have the Zero Time Generator.

In the PX book the first experiment was conducted on October12th 1943, and in the Montauk and other books it was August12th 1943 ....

 

[Apri1]

I came across the Philadelphia Experiment by word of mouth. Someone once told me that they knew of some navy wives that had witnessed the Eldridge disappear right out of the water. Professor Opmmur also has a similar story of how he came to learn of the experiment too. This was way before there was any literature available to read about the Philadelphia Experiment. I came across a Dr. James Corum that was the most credible source so far to date for verifying any of the claims made. He succeeded in constructing a device which demonstrated radar invisibility. I would suggest investigating his research if you want some real meat and potatoes.

Thank you. This is what I'm really interested in. And ideally being able to contact the people first hand if that's possible. I imagine you don't have any documentation proving that this happened? Especially prior to when it became a known thing.

Dont try putting words into my mouth April, i said i understood the possibility of the PX....Frankly you are making a fool of yourself by saying the Montauk Project is all bullshit, when you clearly know absolutely nothing about electronics..
Its up to you to get confirmation and search for "peer" reviews not me, but i guarantee you will not find anyone to contradict Preston Nichols and his electronic expertise, and i doubt very much that anyone would have even attempted to duplicate his work, except for Governments..

If you had read the Montauk Project as you claimed, you will find a glossary at the rear of the Book, Preston Nichols does not need any sources of information, he IS the informant and its his own work, which if you had actually read the book, you would know about..


Dont forget to check out that video clip i told you about...You wanted to see if Preston Nichols knows his maths, so find out on You Tube...."Preston Nichols The Philadelphia Experiment and the Delta Time Generator"....enjoy ..

I have never claimed to read the book you're talking about. I did some brief skimming over the pages and pages of baseless claims about both. And tossed it aside as yet another baseless fringe conspiracy theory. And no. It absolutely is on the person making the claim to prove their claim. I'll read the book but something tells me it's not exactly convincing or detailed. This is why I don't push my experiences as gospel and instead attempt to approach things rationally and logically, so that other people may arrive at the same views. The PX quite clearly would have loads of physical evidence and paper trails surrounding it. So I'm very interested in seeing that. If you lack it, that's a huge red flag.

I'm curious: Is Preston Nichols the sole source for both the PX and the Montauk Project? If so, that's yet again another huge red flag that he's merely a sci-fi other, rather than detailing things that actually happened. The key to finding the truth is to have multiple independent sources all demonstrating the same thing. Which is why peer-reviewed work is important.

I'll definitely check out the things provided though.

 

[TimeFlipper]

@Apri1 Let me quote you as saying in one of your previous postings with your claim that, "I`ve READ up on stuff like the PX and the Montauk stuff"...
Clearly, all you did then was perhaps read the intro on the PX and the Montauk stuff, and then looked at the nice little pics in the PX book ..
That`s not too unusual for most people actually, who are just like the people from one hundred years ago who laughed at claims of watching and hearing people talking on little boxes in their own houses....

FYI, Preston Nichols is not the "sole source" of the PX, there are hundreds of books on that subject which are absolute crap, but Nichols is one of the very few informative writers on the book...He extended the PX into his own work which was clearly stated in the Montauk Project and Montauk Revisited books....The glossary at the end of the Montauk Project is a short guide to help people such as yourself to understand a little bit of what Nichols was writing about......coffee time ...P.S. You cannot approach and discuss books "logically and rationally", if you have no knowledge and understanding on most of the subject matter in those books, i personally never argue about knitting clothing for example....