Judge Bean
Senior Member
minuteman project and Waco type events thread
On the other hand, whether the Waco type events were to gradually occur in 2004 was the actual question. Titor doesn't write that they will begin in a period of time keyed to the election, or in early 2005: these are not "factoids." And "near," as Titor used it casually, sounds more to me like "before" than "during" or "just after."
"Factoids" are fairly important, too, because, by not being sticklers about the details, we tend to bend the facts so that the predictions "come true" or so that Titor is proven to be a hoax, depending.
Originally posted by Timmy G@Nov 1 2004, 05:35 AM
Ya know it's getting bad when we are looking up words in the dictionary hehe.
Timescholar, I agree. That was kind of my point; I realized your question as rhetorical, however I saw some dark humor in answering it :lol:, I'm slightly twisted that way :dry: .
When it comes to JT, I tend to look at everything on the whole . It really cracks me up when people are quick to either 'press' or 'dismiss' an issue because some factoid missed its potential mark by < 24 hours, or in this regard - attempting to hash out whether its 'near' or 'around' some specific event.
I say just let life happen and watch where the chips fall. If they keep falling in JT's direction, then we know what that probably means. If life goes down some road that leads nowhere near his predictions, then we also know what that probably means.
Que Sera Sera
On the other hand, whether the Waco type events were to gradually occur in 2004 was the actual question. Titor doesn't write that they will begin in a period of time keyed to the election, or in early 2005: these are not "factoids." And "near," as Titor used it casually, sounds more to me like "before" than "during" or "just after."
"Factoids" are fairly important, too, because, by not being sticklers about the details, we tend to bend the facts so that the predictions "come true" or so that Titor is proven to be a hoax, depending.