XDrFirefly
Member
Re: 100% Positive
Lets begin with the terrorist. Or should I say Arab Names...
"Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" BBC 9.23.01
Terrorist???
Next to the Cell Phones
Reports of cellphone calls from the allegedly hijacked airplanes on 9/11 were crucial in 'selling' the official version of events. These calls dramatized the horror of 9/11 for the worldwide audience and appeared to prove conclusively that the four 'planes were, in fact, hijacked by terrorists.
However, such phone calls are most implausible on technical and scientific grounds - suggesting the cell phone calls were faked.
http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article....e.php?storyid=6
Ok, to be fair on the Cell phone issue, since it's not aloud to use Cell phone on planes there is very little pre911 data on cell phone useage. I just know how when i'm driving how often I can drop call in some areas, on a big flight the same thing could happen.
[font=Arial,Verdana,Geneva] The 767 is a trusty workhorse used by airlines the world over. It comes in three types, the 200, 300 and 400 series with increasing fuselage length and increasing capacity.
The one shown here is the very same N612UA that took off from Logan airport that fateful 11 September. Note its stubby nose, characteristic of the 200 series. The inset shows the plane that crashed into the South Tower later that day. Somehow, to me, the fuselage seems just that little bit longer.
Perspective is a tricky thing, so let\'s have a look at the scale plans for the 767 below[/font].</span>
Tech Stuff on Planes
When I find the remote controlled stuff I will post if for now I\'ll have to settle with this. <a href=\'http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/uavdrones/frame.htm\' target=\'_blank\'>\"Unmanned Spy Planes\" </a>
I will have much more to come....
Dr FF
</span>
Lets begin with the terrorist. Or should I say Arab Names...
"Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" BBC 9.23.01
Terrorist???
Next to the Cell Phones
Reports of cellphone calls from the allegedly hijacked airplanes on 9/11 were crucial in 'selling' the official version of events. These calls dramatized the horror of 9/11 for the worldwide audience and appeared to prove conclusively that the four 'planes were, in fact, hijacked by terrorists.
However, such phone calls are most implausible on technical and scientific grounds - suggesting the cell phone calls were faked.
http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article....e.php?storyid=6
Ok, to be fair on the Cell phone issue, since it's not aloud to use Cell phone on planes there is very little pre911 data on cell phone useage. I just know how when i'm driving how often I can drop call in some areas, on a big flight the same thing could happen.

The one shown here is the very same N612UA that took off from Logan airport that fateful 11 September. Note its stubby nose, characteristic of the 200 series. The inset shows the plane that crashed into the South Tower later that day. Somehow, to me, the fuselage seems just that little bit longer.
Perspective is a tricky thing, so let\'s have a look at the scale plans for the 767 below[/font].</span>
Tech Stuff on Planes
When I find the remote controlled stuff I will post if for now I\'ll have to settle with this. <a href=\'http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/uavdrones/frame.htm\' target=\'_blank\'>\"Unmanned Spy Planes\" </a>
I will have much more to come....
Dr FF
</span>