Are you suggesting there are no time travelers in this timeline? There may have been changes in history occurring in this timeline that didn't occur in another. And once a person is a time traveler, he wouldn't want to make that knowledge public, would he?Apparently this timeline doesn't have any time travelers on it either.
I did say apparently. Meaning nothing that can be seen or verified. Then speculation is all that is left.
You must realize that this situation in which you have encountered him, is a setting. There is a sense of intuition that really good time travelers possess, in reaching out to others that may be either curious or want to time travel themselves. I don't know how to explain this other than it's just a feeling that one has to have.Hi well I didn’t want to say much on here yet since I do not have more info yet . But I was referring to a guy that I came across lately who claimed to be a time traveler . But his exactly words to me and his conversation was
“ Handlers are major corporations. I work for a secret military unit “
I was waiting to get more info . But I haven’t seen him on social media for like 3 days . Then again he might be lying . And he stopped talking to me lately . I’m waiting on more info . But he seems to be the kind of person that doesn’t like to talk much with others .
It did help . Thanks![]()
Never once did i stipulate that my beliefs directed towards "harry dick" or w/e, are my valid input for time-travel.@9th Wave ..."Absolution definition": Formal release from guilt, obligation or punishment...
"Absolute definition": Not qualified or diminished in anyway...
This thread title is: Questions to a Time Traveller...In my opinion i think the title should read, (No disrespect to you astrophysicsgirl)..
Questions to an "alleged" Time-Traveller...
Some random guy goes onto a social media site and says he`s a time-traveller...The chances of that being an attention seeking guy and NOT a real time-traveller is 99.999999% to infinity...You are utterly naive in believing that any Tom Dick or Harry who goes onto any social media site claiming to be a time-traveller, is speaking the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...
IF there ever was a real time-traveller, he or she would easily answer my question, they would go forward in time one week and bring back three different newspapers headlines...So, how is my simple test being used as an "Absolution" as you quoted?...Which means Who is formally released from guilt, obligation or punishment, the alleged time traveller or me?..I think you should fully understand the words you choose to put...
Quoting you again...Who says, Its a "fact" this timeline itself isnt "Absolute?"....So to you the word "Absolute" means this timeline is "not qualified or diminished in anyway"...Where is the relevance in your choice of word again??....Finally i would like to know what question YOU would ask the alleged time traveller, although personally i dont think you would ask him or her anything?...
not necessarily true...I find it interesting & hilarious that this, "test" is being used as a absolution, when in fact,this timeline itself isn't absolute...
Apparently this timeline doesn't have any time travelers on it either.
Never once did i stipulate that my beliefs directed towrds "harry dick" or w/e, are my valid input for time-travel.@9th Wave ..."Absolution definition": Formal release from guilt, obligation or punishment...
"Absolute definition": Not qualified or diminished in anyway...
This thread title is: Questions to a Time Traveller...In my opinion i think the title should read, (No disrespect to you astrophysicsgirl)..
Questions to an "alleged" Time-Traveller...
Some random guy goes onto a social media site and says he`s a time-traveller...The chances of that being an attention seeking guy and NOT a real time-traveller is 99.999999% to infinity...You are utterly naive in believing that any Tom Dick or Harry who goes onto any social media site claiming to be a time-traveller, is speaking the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...
IF there ever was a real time-traveller, he or she would easily answer my question, they would go forward in time one week and bring back three different newspapers headlines...So, how is my simple test being used as an "Absolution" as you quoted?...Which means Who is formally released from guilt, obligation or punishment, the alleged time traveller or me?..I think you should fully understand the words you choose to put...
Quoting you again...Who says, Its a "fact" this timeline itself isnt "Absolute?"....So to you the word "Absolute" means this timeline is "not qualified or diminished in anyway"...Where is the relevance in your choice of word again??....Finally i would like to know what question YOU would ask the alleged time traveller, although personally i dont think you would ask him or her anything?...
I've merely stated that the possibilities themselves are infinite.
Rather so, is the misfortune that you have an "absolute" capability to understand or grasp why I said what I said...I'm sure your statements are regarded from ms.jedi.
You yourself are naive to think that anyone else is subjective to this timeline or personal confrontations, rather than just be open minded to the tought of it.
You don't have to believe it, you just have TO QUESTION IT.
I never once said the titor situation was real, i merely said I met someone who indicated the possibilities, regardless if it was social media.Never once did i stipulate that my beliefs directed towrds "harry dick" or w/e, are my valid input for time-travel.@9th Wave ..."Absolution definition": Formal release from guilt, obligation or punishment...
"Absolute definition": Not qualified or diminished in anyway...
This thread title is: Questions to a Time Traveller...In my opinion i think the title should read, (No disrespect to you astrophysicsgirl)..
Questions to an "alleged" Time-Traveller...
Some random guy goes onto a social media site and says he`s a time-traveller...The chances of that being an attention seeking guy and NOT a real time-traveller is 99.999999% to infinity...You are utterly naive in believing that any Tom Dick or Harry who goes onto any social media site claiming to be a time-traveller, is speaking the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...
IF there ever was a real time-traveller, he or she would easily answer my question, they would go forward in time one week and bring back three different newspapers headlines...So, how is my simple test being used as an "Absolution" as you quoted?...Which means Who is formally released from guilt, obligation or punishment, the alleged time traveller or me?..I think you should fully understand the words you choose to put...
Quoting you again...Who says, Its a "fact" this timeline itself isnt "Absolute?"....So to you the word "Absolute" means this timeline is "not qualified or diminished in anyway"...Where is the relevance in your choice of word again??....Finally i would like to know what question YOU would ask the alleged time traveller, although personally i dont think you would ask him or her anything?...
I've merely stated that the possibilities themselves are infinite.
Rather so, is the misfortune that you have an "absolute" capability to understand or grasp why I said what I said...I'm sure your statements are regarded from ms.jedi.
You yourself are naive to think that anyone else is subjective to this timeline or personal confrontations, rather than just be open minded to the tought of it.
You don't have to believe it, you just have TO QUESTION IT.
If YOU want to believe what is obviously a hoax, thats your business, other members and me have more critical thinking processes to make our judgements from bye bye![]()
..