Reversed engineered Titor's machine

[tymeonadime]

I hope to someday soon make a breakthrough in communication tech for speaking with the others. The others being spirits or what have you.

I make my living building high performance engines for ATVs motorcycles tuner cars and even RC engines. I deal with extreme tolerances daily. It helps at times for me to simply let my musvleemory take over and just ride out the work. I specialize in two stroke motors. A large part of two stroke performance deals with fluid dynamics and air flow patterns along with resonance and vibrational disturbance. It's amazing how air is circulated through a piston port two stroke with an expansion chamber exhaust. I build each pipe specifically for each motor. No two identical engines will like the same pipe the same way. Because of vibrational disturbance in intake and exhaust flow caused by waves colliding and reversing.

In my mind, the same can be said with the " energy " we associate with spirits. If we can find the right frequencies, communication with the other side would be perfected. Almost.

I Lear best outside of the establishment. I was always the kid in the corner......big mouth and no internal vocabulary filter. If it comes to mind, I will say it.

 

[dh1]

nice analogy. Have you heard of "Instrumental Transcommunication"? it's the advanced form of EVP. They use fax machines, tv monitors, landline phones and photographs to communicate with ghosts in real time 2 way communications.

They said a deceased ITC researcher actually created some technology on the afterlife plane and called his friend on the phone in a 2 way live conversation. They recorded it. The deceased researcher said they had to use tech in the afterlife to make the phone call.

It's tesla tech which is all based on longitudinal wave transmission and reception. Human brain uses the same.

Here's a nice excerpt from Tom Bearden:
"With two cerebral brain halves, the human being also has a Tesla scalar interferometer between his ears. And since the brain and nervous system processes avalanche discharges, it can produce (and detect) scalar Tesla waves to at least a limited degree. Thus a human can sometimes produce anomalous spatiotemporal effects at a distance and through time. This provides an exact mechanism for psychokinesis, levitation, psychic healing, telepathy, precognition, postcognition, remote viewing, etc."

Bearden talks about colliding waves as scalar waves. All objects mechanical, electrically charged whatever emits them. So you could technically build a mechnically resonating metal tube to talk to the afterlife. John Worrell Keely did. He used bronze mechnically shaking tubes to generate antigrav, time travel, free energy, dematerialization, rematerialization, etc. He built a flying craft using them.

PowerPedia:John Keely - PESwiki.com

Prob the best way to talk to the afterlife is to materialize them to full physical form and then they appear like anyone else. Can do the same for angels, demons, astral animals, etc. Usually the materialization isn't permanent, they fade away after a while.

Otherwise you'll need the ghost to have a tesla wave transmitter and you as well then you can talk in real time. Another way is for them to interfere with electronic devices like you see in the ghost hunting tech. That also works.

 

[Einstein]

dh1

I can see you are someone that likes to connect the dots. All I would like to see you do is use real facts instead of the fiction we are taught in school. There is a conspiracy in our schools to make sure no one comes out educated with factual science.

The concept of mass is part of that fiction. It isn't real. There is no mass in our universe. I challenge you to go out and measure the inertial mass of an object undergoing an inertial acceleration. It's never been done. Because you can't measure make believe.

Same thing with a scalar wave. A scalar and a wave are opposites. Any wave is a vector phenomena. It requires the passage of time. A scalar wave might as well be the same thing as pixie dust. It's not real. It's make believe. No one ever built anything with make believe science. Believing something will not make it real.

What about time phenomena? That seems to be what is being covered up with fiction. From my observations there seems to be more than one kind of time. And so far nothing has altered the local flow of time. Different time based clocks behave differently when moved away from the earth. Yet all we are told is atomic based clocks say time flows slower in low earth orbit, and faster in high earth orbit. With no proof at all that an atomic clock is actually measuring the flow of real time.

Do you really believe gravity bends light? Still no earthly experiment exists to prove this yet. It's been pointed out that the sun's atmosphere is responsible for the bending of light making objects behind the sun appear visible.

Even CERN appears to be aligning itself with this fictional science we are taught. The announcement of gravity waves being detected has to be pure fiction just based on local observable facts.

It's becoming very obvious to me that a tremendous effort is being put forth to make sure we don't use real scientific facts to understand anything. Maybe because the real facts once known are too dangerous.

 

[TimeFlipper]

@dh1 You keep mentioning DOR in such a manner as if you dont fully understand what it is....DOR stands for "Dead" ORgone energy as postulated by Wilhelm Reich, and is the antithesis of Orgone Energy of which Reich described as being the universal life-force, amongst other things..
Why is it that you believe DOR and not Orgone Energy, has any useful or meaningful purpose in any of the posting you have mentioned it in?

 

[TimeFlipper]

@Einstein mate...Scalar Waves are believed as being any type of wave except for electromagnetic waves, commonly known as a Hertzian wave...An electro-acoustic wave for example is "seen" as a scalar wave

 

[Einstein]

@Einstein mate...Scalar Waves are believed as being any type of wave except for electromagnetic waves, commonly known as a Hertzian wave...An electro-acoustic wave for example is "seen" as a scalar wave

Who discovered the scalar wave? Why is a wave being called a scalar? Up to this date I've only seen the term being used in disinformation.

 

[TimeFlipper]

Ive no idea who discovered the scalar wave mate, its a term ive known for years, although some scientists prefer to call them a "sort of" electromagnetic wave ..

I just had a quick internet search and James Clerk Maxwell was supposed to have started off the term Scalar Wave...Take a look at him

 

[Einstein]

I first seen the term used by Thomas Bearden. There is no mention or association with Maxwell in my physics book. And there seems to be no understanding by any credible knowledge source to be found.

 

[TimeFlipper]

According to info ive researched, Maxwell`s equations linked electricity to magnetism to give us the standard Hertzian Wave (an electromagnetic wave) and it goes on to say he discovered "other" waves that were higher (in frequency?<< my addition) than the normal Hertzian EM Waves..The "scalar waves" are positioned at right angles coming off the EM wave and are omni-directional, where the normal EM waves are only measurable from standard EM receivers (crystal and valve receivers of the day), and they travel in a straight line....

Scalar Waves are also called Gravitic Waves because they belong to the gravitational field...Maxwell said the scalar waves floated in the aether///hyperspace and they are so fine that they are only one-hundred-millionth of a centimeter in width , hence finer than X Rays and Gamma Waves. ..Most of Maxwells work was done in the 1800s to early 1900s and he did say prior to him dying that scalar waves could also be manipulated into various types of modes and frequencies (just like my electro-acoustic wave i mentioned to you lol ) and if you recall when the two NORTH poles of a magnet are facing each other, there is a collapsed magnetic field between those two magnets which is modulated by an acoustic wave from a noisy pesky little electric motor

 

[Harte]

well how does time slow near massive objects or when traveling really fast?[/quote the effect is caused by the accelerating reference frame.

Centrifugal force could explain antigravity but not the spacetime distortion effects. Gotta remember an astroid travling near a massive sun actually can get stuck by time dilation just floating in space near it. How do you explain an invisible field slowing all objects that don't touch it. Centrifugal force isn't a field...it's a movement.

There is no such thing as centrifugal force. It is only an apparent force (aka a phantom force.) It is actually the reaction force brought about by centripetal force.

Scientists have measured the time dilation effect of objects near the sun or near fast moving particles and objects on earth. Also detected doppler shifting of the light from those fast objects as well as from fast objects out in space.

Anyways still doesn't explain how mass objects warp spacetime then warped spacetime tells objects how to move. So either all fields of curvature don't exist or spacetime isn't nothing and is also an object(aka the aether)

Science has yet to explain a whole lot of "hows." Science - especially theoretical physics - only seeks to establish models that explain our observations, which can then be used to make predictions (and thus provide some self-verification.)

The example I usually use is the Bohr model for the atom that every schoolkid knows. We have no way at all of knowing what an atom actually looks like. So we make a model of some balls stuck together with some other balls flying in orbits around them. That model made predictions that ended up being verified as correct, and so the model was used successfully (until supplanted by the current model - incorporating the Standard Model of particle physics.)
The old model still works perfectly well in ordinary circumstances.

Hey now I seem to be the only one starting serious science conversations on these boards lately. Everything else makes the site look like a social media platform. Be nice. I have reference material for what I discuss. Linked some above.

The 'time energy' I refer to is just a new form of energy discovered a long time ago. *Gasp*. If you can't tell I'm not a troll, maybe ya should spread your knowledge base a a bit.

See now, to me, that's not a serious science conversation. You shouldn't expect serious conversations about bogus internet science.

Harte