Alright, if it is even real. I'm having doubts right now.
-
The Flu has VANISHED; Covid=Flu?
- Thread starter PaulaJedi
- Start date
Alright, if it is even real. I'm having doubts right now.
If the restrictions worked, we'd have very few alleged "cases".
Humans weren't meant to live in a cave. We get viruses. Our bodies fight them off. The weak and vulnerable die. It is nature. It has been happening for centuries. Same with "global warming". Humans must adapt as we have been doing for thousands of years.
Besides, the survival rate is beyond 94% now I believe, and we have the new Regeneron cocktail, an alleged vaccine (that I won't take), etc.
There is no need to shut down the world. Zero need whatsoever.
All for the flu, which does kill.
Harte
Senior Member
Vapor is a gas, and still even a lot of vapor is captured in a mask through condensation.
Droplets literally fly from your mouth every time you speak. They won't pass through a mask.
You talking to a doctor or two certainly doesn't bring flu cases down to zero you know.
You know perfectly well that masks cannot possibly prevent all spreading and that masks are used to lessen the impact, not remove it.
Yours is a straw man argument then.
Johns Hopkins has run those types of events before. Why weren't there pandemics after those?
Are you saying you'd prefer research institutes NOT to simulate pandemics to help with preparedness?
You should realize that there have been several actual epidemic events over the last couple of decades. We are to ignore those so that they don't feed your paranoia?
I won't waste my time digging into really dumb conspiracy theories.
Harte
start at edge
Active Member
I kindly ask you, as well as anyone else (so please spread the word), to keep in mind, each of us in the area (country, state, city, district, …) where we live, who those are asking such things (like still wearing a mask and hiding, regardless if having the vaccine or not) – because we will definitely need to know. At some point, in some places, the “authorities” will impose the vaccine by law (and by raw force) – those we also must keep in mind who exactly they are. Those devils who are in charge of this mad hoax, failed to recognize who actually is on their side, instead they gave us the precise hint to recognize who their henchmen are, so please remember them, even make a list and keep it somewhere safe (written on paper, saved on computer or whatever).
Many of the cheap surgical masks and cloth masks have gaps on the sides and front. There is always the possibility of something escaping or entering.
I've asked others to ask around as well as a form of research.
Using pandemic exercises to shut down the economy and attempt to destroy a president is morally wrong in my opinion.
No. We didn't shut down the world and panic for H1N1 and humanity survived, didn't it? We didn't shut down the world and panic for SARS and humanity survived, didn't it? The paranoia is on the side of the people that are now scared of a virus that has over a 94% survival rate. (94 was the last number I saw, so I don't know if it is higher now).
I do not trust government or CDC. Sorry. Never will.
Harte
Senior Member
Witch Hunt
Senior Member
Really? Before I go in on this, we have to admit that Covid deaths are or will be monetized. Meaning, will health facilities be reimbursed for their Covid expenses. No one is talking about this because it is standard practice to do this. During the Aids crisis, hundreds of hospitals, clinics and hospices got grants for equipment, research grants or straight cash for reimbursements. SARS, MERSA? Same thing just not to the extent of the Aids crisis. So if you think there is not a monetary component to this "crisis", you are being naive.
Now, what about all of the cases of false positives in Covid testing...
You do understand how easy it is to get a false positive Covid result?
These rates may sound low, but when the rate of infection is low, even a small false-positive rate can greatly diminish the reliability of positive test results. For example, consider the scenario diagrammed below, in which 100,000 people are tested, with 1 percent, or 1,000 of them, being infected. If the false-negative rate is 25 percent, a typical estimate from the scientific literature on COVID-19, and the false positive rate is 0.5 percent, a reasonable estimate from our data, then a quarter of the 1,000 samples from infected individuals – that is, 250 samples – will be false negatives, and the rest will be true positives.
The false positives and true negatives are calculated in the diagram in the same way. In the lower part of the diagram, these figures are used to calculate that the percentage of negative results that are false is 0.25 percent, and the percentage of positive results that are false is nearly 40 percent.
So, with a 1-percent infection rate in the test population, a false-positive rate of only 0.5 percent leads to nearly 40 percent of the positive results being wrong. And although the false-negative rate is 50 times higher than the false-positive rate, it is nevertheless much more likely (nearly 160 times more likely) that a positive result will be wrong than a negative result will be wrong. Notice that this doesn't align with what most health authorities have been telling us, which is that we can trust a positive PCR result as proof that we're definitely infected, but that we can't rely on a negative result as proof that we're not infected. In fact, just the opposite is true – negative results are reliable and positive results are not – when the infection rate is low.
Now let's talk about sensitivity....
Why coronavirus tests may be too sensitive
So, with that out of the way, let's talk about the tally...
Discrepancy in COVID-19 numbers arises due to 'probable' cases
In short, there is every reason to think that certain people can and will take advantage of this situation. If you can't at the very least admit that the possibility of a scam exists, there is a bridge in Brooklyn I would like to sell you.
New York Department of health? Government AND New York. Nobody trusts New York. lol.