Kairos
Senior Member
- Messages
- 1,103
You can literally bounce lasers off the mirrors left behind by Apollo astronauts..
It seems really cool!You can literally bounce lasers off the mirrors left behind by Apollo astronauts..
Fun fact you can bounce a laser off nearly any spot on the moon. The mirror stuff is baloney , the moon is highly reflective. It doesn't emit its own light.You can literally bounce lasers off the mirrors left behind by Apollo astronauts..
I also believe that NASA fakes things. But i think we were two times on the moon.Fun fact you can bounce a laser off nearly any spot on the moon. The mirror stuff is baloney , the moon is highly reflective. It doesn't emit its own light.
View attachment 7284
It's like this, No blast crater from a rocket deceleration descent, No moon dust over the gold landing pads from the impact or rocket blast blowback, no skid marks in the sand from an object with forward moving momentum , Almost as if it were placed there. And thats just the problems with tranquility base and eagle one. NASA fakes things... NASA fakes things like crazy a great deal of our black budget is washed through NASA. That doesn't make the earth flat. MATH PROVES THE EARTH IS ROUND to say nothing of seasons or horizons. Like wise , actions have reactions. A rocket deceleration would leave a crater. The spider module never worked on earth. Why would a ration person assume it magically decided to work on the moon? Because it was on TV and repeated over and over again? Repetition of a thing does not make a thing a fact
Fun fact you can bounce a laser off nearly any spot on the moon. The mirror stuff is baloney , the moon is highly reflective.
No blast crater from a rocket deceleration descent
There shouldn't be any dust on the pads. On Earth, dust billows thanks to the atmosphere, but in a vacuum environment (such as the Moon), dust doesn't billow. Instead, objects travel in an unbroken arc-shaped path (gravity causes the arc). The dust, as it was blown away by the engine, shot out sideways or up and away from the LM. No dust was able to billow and remain around the LM, as there was no vacuum.No moon dust over the gold landing pads from the impact or rocket blast blowback
Are you talking about the LM? Why would it have forward-moving momentum? It landed coming straight down. It didn't hit the surface with horizontal velocity.no skid marks in the sand from an object with forward moving momentum , Almost as if it were placed there
Evidence? I've never seen one claim of NASA fakery stand up to scrutiny.NASA fakes things... NASA fakes things like crazy
Evidence? NASA only gets $19billion in the Federal budget. That's next to nothing compared to the entire budget.great deal of our black budget is washed through NASA.
Only if the force of the engine's exhaust was powerful enough. If it wasn't, it'd blow away dust, but it would never dig into the surface.Like wise , actions have reactions. A rocket deceleration would leave a crater.
According to whom? The LM was never designed to land on Earth, or work in an atmosphere, so why should it work on Earth? They tested the thing prior to launch, obviously, but they never tested it to fly on Earth. It would never get off the ground, Earth's gravity is too strong. That's what Apollos 9 and 10 were for though. A9 tested the LM in Earth orbit, and A10 took it to the Moon for the first time.The spider module never worked on earth.
Because that's what it was designed to do. It was tested to make sure each component worked, especially the landing legs, on Earth. They'd drop the LM while simulating 1/6g on Earth to see if the LM could withstand the impact, and it did. Then the whole thing was tested in space on Apollo 9, then it was seen if the whole thing could go through the landing sequence (without actually landing) on Apollo 10.Why would a ration person assume it magically decided to work on the moon?
Of course not, but the evidence does.Because it was on TV and repeated over and over again? Repetition of a thing does not make a thing a fact