HeraldOfTruth
Member
No. There is a balance to everything. Favoring one aspect over another creates a vacuum in whatever system gets put in place.
-
Framework of the Future
- Thread starter HeraldOfTruth
- Start date
No. There is a balance to everything. Favoring one aspect over another creates a vacuum in whatever system gets put in place.ThumberOne
Member
Wouldn't how that vision gets implemented in the future matter?HeraldOfTruth
Member
Obviously. Do you have a point? You will run out of bushes to beat around eventually. I’m a little worried about how many you have already beaten.ThumberOne
Member
I was hoping for further elucidatio
Edit: maybe something we can agree on.Last edited:HeraldOfTruth
Member
You aren’t asking the right questions to get that.
I’ve had to repeat myself to you half a dozen times on multiple occasions and you struggle to move on. Your last two questions are the only things you said here not about something that was supposed to be left at the door, except one statement on politics that was pretty much common sense for politics. So we will see how it goes.ThumberOne
Member
I said for the future. Did I mention your previous actions In that particular post (simple yes or no)?
Speaking of common sense, how common is it compared to in practice?
Did you or did you not said rhe following:
?HeraldOfTruth
Member
No, but you went on about it long enough that I felt the need to clarify some things. You understand clarification, no? It goes both ways.
Politicians will avoid topics that could harm their image. So will any other person with any notable fame. I honestly cannot even imagine a scenario in which someone could say they would expect that from the average person in general, really. I don’t mean to assume, but... I’m not even sure that can be called an assumption. Common sense is called common sense because you shouldn’t even have to question it.ThumberOne
Member
Isn't this discussion partly political in nature?
Also in this discussion, are you trying to influence people via what you present as truth?
Wouldn't further scrutiny of the the avoided topic be necessary?
This really reminds me of a quote by Voltaire: "Common sense is not so common."
Sometimes if we examine obvious answeres we can get surprising results
Even science can be counter intuitive
The Psychologist - The British Psychological Society
digest.bps.org.uk
HeraldOfTruth
Member
Isn't this discussion partly political in nature?
Also in this discussion, are you trying to influence people via what you present as truth?
Wouldn't further scrutiny of the the avoided topic be necessary?
This really reminds me of a quote by Voltaire: "Common sense is not so common."
Sometimes if we examine obvious answeres we can get surprising results
Even science can be counter intuitive
The Psychologist - The British Psychological Society
Do you have any other rhetorical questions? I’m gonna be honest, you have grown incredibly annoying with them.
Also, most of those are not even counter-intuitive. If you think they are, I will tell you how they are not. The problem here is that you are using things out of context. If you have to ask that specific question you asked me and think for a second that there is more than one answer, you lack commonly established facts that have been around for decades before I was even thought of. Not everything people claim as common sense truly is, but my definition is the proper one for it. If the average person knows something without having to question it, it is common sense. Politicians are liars. Everyone knows this. Anyone who doesn’t hadn’t heard of politics.ThumberOne
Member
Those weren't rhetorical questions.
You did told me stop making assumptions and would asking questions be a way to avoid them? If not how?