HDRKid
My comments in {} Brackets.
*****************************
Kid,
For your information, there is a great difference between Jesus and Christ.
{Lets not get into this... I have eread htis forum before signign on, I know yor into wicca and 'The Old ways", but lets not mutilate Christ and Chrisyainity shall we?}-Zarove
Jesus was the man that lived over 2000 years ago. The term Christ has nothing to do with Jesus except to describe his State Of Consciousness.
{This is not true. The term "Christ" wa sNOT a mere descriptive of a state of conciosuness, its the Greek for Mesiah, and is th tital worn by Jesus because CHristaisn veiw him as the Mesiah which was logn awaited for Israel. The Christ conciosuness thing is sheer drek.}-Zarove
Jesus was explaining that unless your consciousness is of ' the Christ Way' or the Christ Consciousness, you would not be able to experience higher consciousness or heaven in this life time while you were living.
{ This said the weiccan... sorry, f you bother to READ the gospel accunts, noen of the eastern philospphy inserted into Jesus's sayings actually manifests. Jesus said " I am the way, the trith, and the light, no man sees the father expet by me". He did NOT say " I am here to tehc you of the Christ conciosuness".
Befoe you go tryign to discredit the New testament, please do so with more ocnvencign arguments than they are fomr he hcurhc, such as Jesus actually sayign what you say he said...
Jesus was at leats a Phrophet, and, if the New testament is to be trusted, which I know to be certain at this point ater years of study, then he did NOT cme to reveal christ COnciosness... he came to brign the tehcings of remssion of sin and save the peopel form there sins,a nd expanded Israel form the mere pepel of he naiton to all peopel globaly.
His teahcigns are noble enough and dont need mysteical reinterpretaiton, stndard Chrisyain orthodoxy will suffice. after all, jesus was not an eastern philoospher byt a Jewish itenerate Preracher...}-Zarove
One of his disciples said that he would follow where ever Jesus lead, and Jesus's reply was to explain that only one or two disciples were able to follow at that moment in time and that "Foxes have their dens and Birds have their nests" This kind reply explained that the man was not yet able to follow but that his state of consciousness was just as valid but at the time would not enable him to experience the state of higher consciousness ie, Soul Travel. Note that I did not use the term Astral Travel.
{This is horrible Biblical exegesis...
The exact passage formt he trustworthy and easy to acces KJV ( and it will read the same way in all trnalaitosn relaly, except mnor wordign diffeences) is below.
8. Now when Jesus saw great multitudes about him, he gave commandment to depart unto the other side.
19. And a certain scribe came, and said unto him, Master, I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest.
20. And Jesus saith unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.
21. And another of his disciples said unto him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father.
22. But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.
23. And when he was entered into a ship, his disciples followed him.
This exrpt is taken form Mathew chapter 8.
The correct interrpetation fo these events hoguh sin that only oen or two where ready for chirst conciouness, but that all those who follow Jesus must do so NOW whole he is avalable, and must be prepared or a hard rad, sicne Jesus had no home of his own.
Its NOT a mayusteical teahcing about the human race not beign reay for chist conciousness, ts just a statemn of cold, hard fact about hi current sitiatuon and his warning the scribe that it wont be easy.
Pleas don re-interpret the Bible to suit your whimsies.
I know Im new here and Im not trign to make enemies but Im a sickenr for these thigns and I think if yo get ot know me I can impres iwht manners, btu also with precision of thought.}-Zarove
You are still going by someones interpretation of an occurence over 2000 years ago.
{Yeah his is a mere inter[retaiton wheras yours is he trht, right? Thats the biggest rason i dropped all new age thought form my theology itenerary. They mock the traditional undersnading, ten reintrrpt it herr way, as if theres is more valid.
Plain reading does bete than importaiton of thought.}-Zarove
Add to that all the times they "revised" what information they would let out.
{Not the "Wevil Chruhc edited the Bible" routine...
They didnt revise anyhting. The oldest MSS we hae of he Ne testament agrees with later MSS. No lateratiosn appear to have been made tot he New Yestament generlaly over time, and it is seen as the bst kept collection of ancient MSS form the classical world.
The reivison fo the new testament claim made by sceptics and paagns alike is just so many cobblers.
Stop tryig to defame the Biblicisists who often died for the texts.
Unless you have proof of this revision, form accredited sigtes, you are no better than HDRKid and his claims of the HSDR and time travel.}-Zarove
Why don't you go back and ask Jesus your self?
{I'd love to, if I thought the H
R woidl remotely work...heck thi si a tiem travel forum. But what makes yo so sure of your reintrpetation of things?}-Zarove
Be very sure to ask him where he was those 16 years in Tibet.
{You have proof he spent any time in Tibet? Any documentaiton at all? If not, hwo do you know he was eve in ibet? You relais ehow far Artibet is form Israel right? Rememebr, by sea or by foot bakc then...and no roman road or trade route mad Tibet an unknown locaiton back in palistine...}-Zarove
you will have to brush up on your early Aramaic or early Hebrew, you may want to cultivate some jewish friends that are getting ready for their coming of age as they will be studying.
{I happen to know Hebrew... not to mention Hisotry. This is why I reject your "16 years in Tibet" statement... }-Zarove
I have suggested more than once that you go and build your background in information. Perhaps instead of playing with that machine, you might go to a few book stores or libraries and broaden your horizons.
{I can make a similar suggestion o you. If yo htink Jesus relay was teahcign easter mystesissm and lived 16 year sin Tibet, then you have to acount for the severe academic issues this rigns up, such as te removteness of Tibet and te distance form galloli, and lak of documentaiton... and yu ignor what the term "Chrust" means. it means "Annointed", and is a ROYAL title, that has nohtign to do with enlightenment.}-Zarove
I have made no one a liar.
{Nor I, peopel generlaly fall into thigns on their own, not that I htink yor a liar, but I do think you read too many pagan books and not enough objective Hisotry...}-Zarove
However, your interpretation or belief in a dead book has made you look very foolish because you expect all other people to believe as you do religiously.
{isnt this just cinecending and rude? The Bible is NOT a dead book, and by yor summery reinterpretaiton of the life of Jesus shows, it still has atleats some impact.
and is this just a cheap bully tacic designed to one up peopel wose vrw don coincide with your own? I mean, relay, you want us to think you are wise, well rad, and enlightened because tou DONT stidy this dead book, and we ar all therofre suppose to agrre woth YOU religiosuly. Thats basiclaly what Im feelign right nwo when i read such statements, and it irritates me since its just arrogant and hypocritical.}-Zarove
Just because people do not follow the bible, does not mean that they have not been saved.
{And just because soemone says thy are wise, doesnt mean they are. Why knock the Bible, say its been revised wth no proof, say Jeuss live din tibe with no porrf, and basiclaly make out liek this is an infirior religosu eleif system? Why mock the rleigiosu beleif of Christaisn at all, and why not just focus on HDRKid himself?}-Zarove
In closing, hae to say sorry, but I don lik the condecneign attetus toward the Bible and chrisyainity. its notenlightened, tis not wise, and its not particulalry the best way to win an arugment, epsecally when yor own sttements have logical and factual errors contianed therein.
My comments in {} Brackets.
*****************************
Kid,
For your information, there is a great difference between Jesus and Christ.
{Lets not get into this... I have eread htis forum before signign on, I know yor into wicca and 'The Old ways", but lets not mutilate Christ and Chrisyainity shall we?}-Zarove
Jesus was the man that lived over 2000 years ago. The term Christ has nothing to do with Jesus except to describe his State Of Consciousness.
{This is not true. The term "Christ" wa sNOT a mere descriptive of a state of conciosuness, its the Greek for Mesiah, and is th tital worn by Jesus because CHristaisn veiw him as the Mesiah which was logn awaited for Israel. The Christ conciosuness thing is sheer drek.}-Zarove
Jesus was explaining that unless your consciousness is of ' the Christ Way' or the Christ Consciousness, you would not be able to experience higher consciousness or heaven in this life time while you were living.
{ This said the weiccan... sorry, f you bother to READ the gospel accunts, noen of the eastern philospphy inserted into Jesus's sayings actually manifests. Jesus said " I am the way, the trith, and the light, no man sees the father expet by me". He did NOT say " I am here to tehc you of the Christ conciosuness".
Befoe you go tryign to discredit the New testament, please do so with more ocnvencign arguments than they are fomr he hcurhc, such as Jesus actually sayign what you say he said...
Jesus was at leats a Phrophet, and, if the New testament is to be trusted, which I know to be certain at this point ater years of study, then he did NOT cme to reveal christ COnciosness... he came to brign the tehcings of remssion of sin and save the peopel form there sins,a nd expanded Israel form the mere pepel of he naiton to all peopel globaly.
His teahcigns are noble enough and dont need mysteical reinterpretaiton, stndard Chrisyain orthodoxy will suffice. after all, jesus was not an eastern philoospher byt a Jewish itenerate Preracher...}-Zarove
One of his disciples said that he would follow where ever Jesus lead, and Jesus's reply was to explain that only one or two disciples were able to follow at that moment in time and that "Foxes have their dens and Birds have their nests" This kind reply explained that the man was not yet able to follow but that his state of consciousness was just as valid but at the time would not enable him to experience the state of higher consciousness ie, Soul Travel. Note that I did not use the term Astral Travel.
{This is horrible Biblical exegesis...
The exact passage formt he trustworthy and easy to acces KJV ( and it will read the same way in all trnalaitosn relaly, except mnor wordign diffeences) is below.
8. Now when Jesus saw great multitudes about him, he gave commandment to depart unto the other side.
19. And a certain scribe came, and said unto him, Master, I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest.
20. And Jesus saith unto him, The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.
21. And another of his disciples said unto him, Lord, suffer me first to go and bury my father.
22. But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.
23. And when he was entered into a ship, his disciples followed him.
This exrpt is taken form Mathew chapter 8.
The correct interrpetation fo these events hoguh sin that only oen or two where ready for chirst conciouness, but that all those who follow Jesus must do so NOW whole he is avalable, and must be prepared or a hard rad, sicne Jesus had no home of his own.
Its NOT a mayusteical teahcing about the human race not beign reay for chist conciousness, ts just a statemn of cold, hard fact about hi current sitiatuon and his warning the scribe that it wont be easy.
Pleas don re-interpret the Bible to suit your whimsies.
I know Im new here and Im not trign to make enemies but Im a sickenr for these thigns and I think if yo get ot know me I can impres iwht manners, btu also with precision of thought.}-Zarove
You are still going by someones interpretation of an occurence over 2000 years ago.
{Yeah his is a mere inter[retaiton wheras yours is he trht, right? Thats the biggest rason i dropped all new age thought form my theology itenerary. They mock the traditional undersnading, ten reintrrpt it herr way, as if theres is more valid.
Plain reading does bete than importaiton of thought.}-Zarove
Add to that all the times they "revised" what information they would let out.
{Not the "Wevil Chruhc edited the Bible" routine...
They didnt revise anyhting. The oldest MSS we hae of he Ne testament agrees with later MSS. No lateratiosn appear to have been made tot he New Yestament generlaly over time, and it is seen as the bst kept collection of ancient MSS form the classical world.
The reivison fo the new testament claim made by sceptics and paagns alike is just so many cobblers.
Stop tryig to defame the Biblicisists who often died for the texts.
Unless you have proof of this revision, form accredited sigtes, you are no better than HDRKid and his claims of the HSDR and time travel.}-Zarove
Why don't you go back and ask Jesus your self?
{I'd love to, if I thought the H

Be very sure to ask him where he was those 16 years in Tibet.
{You have proof he spent any time in Tibet? Any documentaiton at all? If not, hwo do you know he was eve in ibet? You relais ehow far Artibet is form Israel right? Rememebr, by sea or by foot bakc then...and no roman road or trade route mad Tibet an unknown locaiton back in palistine...}-Zarove
you will have to brush up on your early Aramaic or early Hebrew, you may want to cultivate some jewish friends that are getting ready for their coming of age as they will be studying.
{I happen to know Hebrew... not to mention Hisotry. This is why I reject your "16 years in Tibet" statement... }-Zarove
I have suggested more than once that you go and build your background in information. Perhaps instead of playing with that machine, you might go to a few book stores or libraries and broaden your horizons.
{I can make a similar suggestion o you. If yo htink Jesus relay was teahcign easter mystesissm and lived 16 year sin Tibet, then you have to acount for the severe academic issues this rigns up, such as te removteness of Tibet and te distance form galloli, and lak of documentaiton... and yu ignor what the term "Chrust" means. it means "Annointed", and is a ROYAL title, that has nohtign to do with enlightenment.}-Zarove
I have made no one a liar.
{Nor I, peopel generlaly fall into thigns on their own, not that I htink yor a liar, but I do think you read too many pagan books and not enough objective Hisotry...}-Zarove
However, your interpretation or belief in a dead book has made you look very foolish because you expect all other people to believe as you do religiously.
{isnt this just cinecending and rude? The Bible is NOT a dead book, and by yor summery reinterpretaiton of the life of Jesus shows, it still has atleats some impact.
and is this just a cheap bully tacic designed to one up peopel wose vrw don coincide with your own? I mean, relay, you want us to think you are wise, well rad, and enlightened because tou DONT stidy this dead book, and we ar all therofre suppose to agrre woth YOU religiosuly. Thats basiclaly what Im feelign right nwo when i read such statements, and it irritates me since its just arrogant and hypocritical.}-Zarove
Just because people do not follow the bible, does not mean that they have not been saved.
{And just because soemone says thy are wise, doesnt mean they are. Why knock the Bible, say its been revised wth no proof, say Jeuss live din tibe with no porrf, and basiclaly make out liek this is an infirior religosu eleif system? Why mock the rleigiosu beleif of Christaisn at all, and why not just focus on HDRKid himself?}-Zarove
In closing, hae to say sorry, but I don lik the condecneign attetus toward the Bible and chrisyainity. its notenlightened, tis not wise, and its not particulalry the best way to win an arugment, epsecally when yor own sttements have logical and factual errors contianed therein.