Hello

Re: Hello

"Considering the exponential growth of the rate of technological advancement, what is there to say that we cannot have the scientific knowledge to genetically alter the genome of a monkey to raise the level of its conciousness to sentiency, and with it the shame these 'travellers' claim they will have, within 150 years from now?"


- Felic--

"Within the normal animal evolutionary process, yes there is no way the Macaques could advance as such within 150 solar years. However, that concept is immediately rejected without inclination or patience to understand that perhaps a non-evolutionary event or technological imposition occured which 'jumped up' the Macaques' evolution in a quicker."
- rostin jarmor

Will one of those ridiculing the hard-working macaques of the future please respond to these points?

Rostin, I once posted six pages of a Word document in 12 point times new roman in a single message. However, dividing the text between several posts can make it easier for readers to digest. Also, try to utilise regular paragraphs and bold titles etc if your post is really wordy.
 
Re: Hello

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"gl100\")</div>
I vaguely remember my brother telling me about them. Weren't they from somewhere in Asia? Can't say I recall any songs though.

I do think that we need a theme song for this tale though. He/she did say that they were musical archeologists. Let me recommend a couple. King Crimson's 21st Century Schizoid Man and The Traveling Wilburys' Tweeter and the Monkey Man come to mind.[/b]
Click to expand...

No Mon, ya ask for songs from Creedence right? Ayree, I offer ya songs from da Album 'Cozmos Factory' wit da Creedence man sittin on a bicycle Mon. Ya wan go play Babylon on me now Mon?

How bout we call it "The Harder they come the harder they fall" from Jimmy Cliff???
 
Re: Hello

"Considering the exponential growth of the rate of technological advancement, what is there to say that we cannot have the scientific knowledge to genetically alter the genome of a monkey to raise the level of its conciousness to sentiency, and with it the shame these 'travellers' claim they will have, within 150 years from now?"


- Felic--

It's way better to use money on the poor citizens that are living and bring up their standard of living, food and health care that to waste it on animals that are only going to be exploited by heartless politicians that do not give a damn.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Hello

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Felic--\")</div>
You consider yourself an intellectual Starlord. You are also a very angry person. Please bear in mind that this forum is not the place for you to vent that anger at lesser beings, myself included.[/b]
Click to expand...

Ralan, felic,

I remember long ago when you left after a hissyfit because not many believed like you did about those that come here and lie to us. Things have not changed, as you will notice the owners of this Board, Ban Hoaxers.

Son, don't presume to lecture me, not at your age. I am being real nice at this point, don't press your luck.

Don't turn this into a personal thing between you and I, your view point was wrong then and it's wrong now. that's all.
 
Re: Hello

"I remember long ago when you left after a hissyfit because not many believed like you did about those that come here and lie to us. Things have not changed, as you will notice the owners of this Board, Ban Hoaxers."

You fail to intimidate me.

"Son, don't presume to lecture me, not at your age. I am being real nice at this point, don't press your luck."
"your view point was wrong then and it's wrong now. that's all."

You shrug me off on the basis of age, yet you are blind to the immaturity of your own words. I have never said that your view point is wrong, yet in sheer opinionated zeal you ultimately denounce mine. You appear not to have noticed that it is not the solid laws on hoaxers I am fighting as my view point, but the patronising and aggresive way you treat time travel claimants, and those who disagree with your inpenetrable, one sided view of the world.

Get as nasty with me as you like, it will only emphasise my point. Since I returned to the forum and began posting you were immediately on my case, violently attacking my personal views. I have made several attempts to resolve my differences with you and you refuse to see reason.
 
Re: Hello

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"StarLord\")</div>
No Mon, ya ask for songs from Creedence right? Ayree, I offer ya songs from da Album 'Cozmos Factory' wit da Creedence man sittin on a bicycle Mon. Ya wan go play Babylon on me now Mon?

How bout we call it \"The Harder they come the harder they fall\" from Jimmy Cliff???[/b]
Click to expand...

Mea culpa, mea culpa , mea culpa. Didn't make the connection. They told me back then that there could be long term side effects. But hey, I've made it past sixty so I can start saying its just old age.:lol: I do still remember a group by that name though.
 
Re: Hello

Felic,
Interesting, All I mentioned was do not presume to lecture me at you age.
I see no violence in that. You want to coddle and reweard people that lie. On the other threadf with genera, John pointed out that folks that Hoax get banned and closed the thread.

Unless you choose to hoax your point is less than moot. As I am not persuing you as a Hoaxer you have even less to worry about what I do.
 
Re: Hello

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"gl100\")</div>
Mea culpa, mea culpa , mea culpa. Didn't make the connection. They told me back then that there could be long term side effects. But hey, I've made it past sixty so I can start saying its just old age.:lol: I do still remember a group by that name though.[/b]
Click to expand...

Aye Mon, Rastafarai I & I, tis ahard path to follow, easy to lose the way.

Whad ya say we call this thread Buffalo Girls.....
 
Re: Hello

"Felic,
Interesting, All I mentioned was do not presume to lecture me at you age.
I see no violence in that. You want to coddle and reweard people that lie. On the other threadf with genera, John pointed out that folks that Hoax get banned and closed the thread."

I agree; that particularly post I would not describe as violent. I am referring to the intensity of your desire for negative argument and to publicly dominate your percieved 'enemies'. Maybe this is not evident to you because you are not affected by it directly; so take my word for it. Less 'mentionned' more 'commanded'. I have no desire to 'coddle and reward' liars and you know it. I simply see no need for treating them in such an aggressive manner.
 

Top