Sanyam Deshi
Junior Member
Regarding where I am going with this argument: my words speak for themselves. You don't need to read into anything and you can pretty much take most of what I say for what it is.The dates are approximations, Harte. Nobody knows the exact dates of anything that long ago.
Sanyam, I really have no idea where you are going with this argument. The BBC is not the only agency reporting.
Director James Cameron and narrator Simcha Jacobovici are making Ralph's findings public now.
Ralph's findings on Exodus.
Ralph's findings on Mary Magdalene.
Thanks, for more examples of channels that don't promise credible programming running some more documentaries on people who create their own interpretations. It doesn't take much effort to realize that Ellis has his own biases against Christianity. Within seconds of going on his official website, I was reminded of the historical propaganda that occurred in Germany in the early 20th century. The only difference is that the subject of the propaganda was Jews, not Christians. As Harte so efficiently pointed out, Ellis is not very accurate in the points that he makes. Clearly, Ellis treats his findings as facts and his main priority is to gain anti-Christian support, but not the facts themselves. Unfortunately, you have directly picked up on this style of argument, and it has led to some self-righteous exchange of ideas. You shouldn't let other people speak for you, because I know you are capable for greater and better thoughts and idea-exchanges if you think as an individual. You don't have to continue this charade, Ren.