I think his point was that statistically there is a significant chance of at least one major earthquake, but it isn't very helpful if we don't know when or where... specifically where.
It's in my article. I provided a link.
I think his point was that statistically there is a significant chance of at least one major earthquake, but it isn't very helpful if we don't know when or where... specifically where.
The fault line in the midwest. You missed that part.
But to you, everything is fiction, so I am doubting that even matters at this point.
Do you belong to the Flat Earth Society? Just curious.