Einstein
Temporal Engineer
- Messages
- 5,413
mistertimes
We measure the flow of time with atomic clocks. We know that the atomic clocks tick faster out in space away from a gravitational body. But what if it is not time that makes those clocks tick faster? Could it be proximity to a gravitational body that is causing nuclear decay rates to change? It looks like I just opened a can of worms with that question. Didn't I just connect the gravitational force to the nuclear force? It looks like controlling one also will elicit some control over the other. Quite possibly they are one in the same.
I do have another candidate for what is missing. I call it the negative inertial force. Or negative rotation. It's a force I hypothesized to exist to explain the force of gravity. There is an observation in the operation of the Zero Time Generator that suggests this force is present and can account for the observed behavior.
Before I built this device, I had played around with rotating magnetic fields with no results.
In my experiments with the Tesla coil, I did try different elements for use as the discharge electrode.
I have not done any experimentation at altitude. I don't quite understand your reference to flight 370.
Physical orientations of the components in the device were used to create three separate rotations on the three orthogonal planes of space.
I wouldn't say that time is not connected to gravitational weight.. I think they are connected but something is missing and none of us know what it is that missing as of when I write this post
We measure the flow of time with atomic clocks. We know that the atomic clocks tick faster out in space away from a gravitational body. But what if it is not time that makes those clocks tick faster? Could it be proximity to a gravitational body that is causing nuclear decay rates to change? It looks like I just opened a can of worms with that question. Didn't I just connect the gravitational force to the nuclear force? It looks like controlling one also will elicit some control over the other. Quite possibly they are one in the same.
I do have another candidate for what is missing. I call it the negative inertial force. Or negative rotation. It's a force I hypothesized to exist to explain the force of gravity. There is an observation in the operation of the Zero Time Generator that suggests this force is present and can account for the observed behavior.
did you work around vortexes before?
did you work with chemicals/chemical elements? and I'm not talking about narcotic drugs.
did you have the ability to work at specific altitudes? or while flying aka flight 370..
locations/angles will matter too I believe
Before I built this device, I had played around with rotating magnetic fields with no results.
In my experiments with the Tesla coil, I did try different elements for use as the discharge electrode.
I have not done any experimentation at altitude. I don't quite understand your reference to flight 370.
Physical orientations of the components in the device were used to create three separate rotations on the three orthogonal planes of space.