Hamas Attacks Israel

Why can't there be a world peace military that will stop any conflict starting. They be the police of the global nations. Every country would have to obey not to strike or make a terrorist attack on another country otherwise their government would be suspended while the peace military investigate the conflict. Depending on the outcome of the investigation whether the government get reinstated or a new government get put in place.
 
unholy_dragon said:
Why can't there be a world peace military that will stop any conflict starting. They be the police of the global nations. Every country would have to obey not to strike or make a terrorist attack on another country otherwise their government would be suspended while the peace military investigate the conflict. Depending on the outcome of the investigation whether the government get reinstated or a new government get put in place.
Click to expand...
Because first you need international treaties defining provocation, which is very cultural and hard to define without bias. There will always be loopholes, accumulated small things and hidden communication. They might dump nuclear waste right next to a border, burn down religious buildings and call it repeated accidents, outlaw something central to a culture.

Without getting rid of provocations, countries can only team up with those who usually make the right decisions with an alliance.
 
unholy_dragon said:
Why can't there be a world peace military that will stop any conflict starting. They be the police of the global nations. Every country would have to obey not to strike or make a terrorist attack on another country otherwise their government would be suspended while the peace military investigate the conflict. Depending on the outcome of the investigation whether the government get reinstated or a new government get put in place.
Click to expand...

It seems you are not familiar with the homicidal maniac mentality. They just prefer to kill without reason. The hate center in their brains is permanently turned on. Just like dogs with rabies. The only sane solution for the rest of us not afflicted is to wipe them out of existence. Sometimes genocide is justified just to restore peace.
 
unholy_dragon said:
Why can't there be a world peace military that will stop any conflict starting. They be the police of the global nations. Every country would have to obey not to strike or make a terrorist attack on another country otherwise their government would be suspended while the peace military investigate the conflict. Depending on the outcome of the investigation whether the government get reinstated or a new government get put in place.
Click to expand...
Simple - Greed

War = Money, so long as the war machine rolls on the money keeps flowing.
Congress can pass Laws, and give money based off war, you think all that money goes to foreign country's? Nope, lines the pockets of the elite.

I always loved the idea of 1 on 1 hand to hand combat no weapons by the leaders of the country and that is what determines what, but even then you'd have cheaters or special interest groups buying in.

If you wanted to start a conflict your leader had to fight the leader of the country that you're attacking and that is only if they agree.

Sadly there is no real easy to to prevent war, short of just straight up killing those who start it, but then does that make the people doing the killing any better than the war mongers? What happens when the killers get power hungry who kills them?
 
BlastTyrant said:
Simple - Greed

War = Money, so long as the war machine rolls on the money keeps flowing.
Congress can pass Laws, and give money based off war, you think all that money goes to foreign country's? Nope, lines the pockets of the elite.

I always loved the idea of 1 on 1 hand to hand combat no weapons by the leaders of the country and that is what determines what, but even then you'd have cheaters or special interest groups buying in.

If you wanted to start a conflict your leader had to fight the leader of the country that you're attacking and that is only if they agree.

Sadly there is no real easy to to prevent war, short of just straight up killing those who start it, but then does that make the people doing the killing any better than the war mongers? What happens when the killers get power hungry who kills them?
Click to expand...

The fine art of having peace without compromise never happens whenever there is hatred
confined within a set system of belief where one party cannot follow what another does.

Then again...I am naive enough to not understand why religions cannot see that
the end goals for each are relatively the same....And yes, I know it goes deeper than that.

Blood is usually all the same colour but Hatred is easier, I guess.
 
I have never understood that here in the USA when it comes to Catholics, Mormons, Christians, Lutherans...etc etc they will all bash each other and throw stones "New testament is the correct bible!! Nah uh King James is the correct! nah uh", but it is like ya'll worship the same God and have the same believes, like wtf are you fighting about??
 
BlastTyrant said:
I have never understood that here in the USA when it comes to Catholics, Mormons, Christians, Lutherans...etc etc they will all bash each other and throw stones "New testament is the correct bible!! Nah uh King James is the correct! nah uh", but it is like ya'll worship the same God and have the same believes, like wtf are you fighting about??
Click to expand...
Exactly.

(y)
 

Summary​

  1. The US has launched strikes on 85 targets in Syria and Iraq in response to Sunday's drone attack on a US military base that killed three soldiers
  2. US Centcom says its forces conducted airstrikes against Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corp Quds Force and affiliated militia groups
  3. "Our response began today. It will continue at times and places of our choosing," President Biden said in a statement on Friday
  4. Three US soldiers were killed and more than 40 personnel injured in a drone attack at a US base called Tower 22
  5. The White House blamed Iran and vowed a "very consequential response"
  6. Iran denies involvement, calling the accusations "baseless" and saying it was "not involved in the decision-making of resistance groups"


 

Top